Business ethicists draw extensively on Aristotle’s work in defining the purpose of the business corporation. Insights from ancient authors can be valuable in illuminating contemporary issues, but we should be wary of enlisting their authority for our views without paying careful attention to what they might have intended by what they said in their own social and economic context. Business ethicists have argued that the business corporation should be a community within which its members can live a good life; that its purpose should not be to maximise profits; and that it should integrate itself into a range of wider communities beyond its own boundaries and serve their interests. Aristotle would have agreed that the business corporation should not seek to make as much profit as possible, although he might have accepted that – in the light of modern developments in economic management - it should make enough profit to fund projects that would be beneficial to society. Aristotle’s view that the polis provided the setting in which people could best live a good life does not justify the claim that the business corporation can or should serve a similar purpose. Aristotle believed that people should strive for enough and not too much in several contexts, not only in acquiring wealth, but also in defining the size and scope of the community of which they should be members. Some expansive, contemporary views on the communities into which the business corporation should integrate itself are alien to Aristotle’s thinking.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The literal translation of the word chreia as “need” that is adopted here, in place of Rackham’s translation of the word as “demand”, follows Finley’s (1974) rejection of Rackham’s translation as an anachronistic introduction of a term from modern economic theory.
Aristotle 1932. Politics, Trans. Rackham, H., Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
Aristotle 1934. Nicomachean Ethics, Trans. Rackham, H., Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
Collins, D. 1987. Aristotle and business. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (7): 567–572.
Deal, T., and A. Kennedy. 1988. Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. London: Penguin Books.
Dierksmeier, C., and M. Pirson. 2009. Oikonomia versus Chrematistike: Learning from Aristotle about the future orientation of business management. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (3): 417–430.
Finley, M.I. 1968. Aspects of antiquity. London: Chatto & Windus.
Finley, M.I. 1974. Aristotle and economic analysis. In Studies in Ancient Society, 26–52. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Gimbel, S. 2005. Can corporations be morally responsible? Aristotle, stakeholders and the non-Sale of Hershey. Philosophy of Management 5 (3): 23–30.
Heath, M. 2008. Aristotle on natural slavery. Phronesis 53 (3): 243–270.
Hopkins, K. 1967. Slavery in classical antiquity. In Ciba Foundation Symposium on Caste and Race: Comparative Approaches, ed. A.V.S. de Reuck and J. Knight, 166–177.
Hopper, R.J. 1961. The mines and miners of ancient Athens. Greece & Rome 8 (2): 138–151.
Jones, A.H.M. 1956. Slavery in the ancient world. The Economic History Review, New Series 9 (2): 185–199.
Kurzynski, M. 2009. Peter Drucker: Modern day Aristotle for the business community. Journal of Management History 15 (4): 357–374.
Meikle, S. 1979. Aristotle and the political economy of the polis. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 99: 57–73.
Michell, H. 1957. The economics of ancient Greece (second edition). Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons Ltd..
Mulgan, R. 1994. Aristotle and the political role of women. History of Political Thought 15 (2): 179–202.
Ouchi, W. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (1): 129–141.
Pearce, C.D. 2013. Aristotle and business: An inescapable tension. In Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics, ed. C. Luetge. New York: Springer.
Plato 2013. Republic: Books 1–5, Trans. Emlyn-Jones, C. and Preddy, W., Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
Roca, E. 2007. Rethinking Aristotelian communities as contemporary corporations. Philosophy of Management 6 (2): 77–85.
Rosivach, V.J. 1999. Enslaving ‘Barbaroi’ and the Athenian ideology of slavery. Historia: Zeitschrift Für Alte Geschichte 48 (2): 129–157.
Solomon, R.C. 1992. Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelean approach to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (3): 317–339.
Solomon, R.C. 2004. Aristotle, ethics and business Organisations. Organisation Studies 25 (6): 1021–1043.
Whitehead, D. 1975. Aristotle the Metic. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, New Series 21 (201): 94–99.
Wijnberg, N.M. 2000. Normative stakeholder theory and Aristotle: The link between ethics and politics. Journal of Business Ethics 25 (4): 329–342.
Conflict of Interest
The author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Shaw, D. Recontextualising Aristotelian Perspectives on the Purpose of the Business Corporation. Philosophy of Management (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-020-00161-x
- Business corporation
- Profit maximisation