Envisioning the Aesthetic Firm


This paper draws on the work of Alain Badiou and Martin Heidegger to construct a postructural theory of the firm. The ideal firm is conceived as a technology that facilitates a technology-free void/site of potential. For actors within this firm to be ethical requires their achievement of human subjecthood through aesthetic fidelity to the site-induced events. Heidegger’s concerns regarding the enframing effects of technology and his recognition of the truth-revealing qualities of art, are incorporated here into a theory of the firm as an idealized, technology facilitated, aesthetic void-of-potential revealing. Authentic human being thus implies that firms-as-technology ‘get out of the way’. This theory of the firm is further revealed through Badiou’s concept of event-driven human flourishing. We embrace Badiou’s ‘ethics-of-truths’ in which fidelity to the trace of an event creates human subjecthood. We consider implications of our theory-of-the-firm for social media firms such as Alphabet and Facebook.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Assleander, Michael S., 2019, “Adam Smith and his vision of ethical capitalism”, presentation given at international Vincentian business ethics conference, Dublin, Ireland.

  2. Badiou, Alain, 2001 Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil, (Peter Hallward trans.), New York: Verso.

  3. Badiou, Alain, 2003 “Beyond Formalization” (interview with Peter Hallward in Angelaki, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 111–136.

  4. Bakewell, Sarah. 2017. At the existentialist Café. New York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caputo, John D., 1996,“A Community without Truth: Derrida and the Impossible Community” Research in Phenomenology, Volume 26: Issue 1.

  6. Cazeaux, Clive. 2000. The continental aesthetics reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chytry, J. 2007. Organizational aesthetics: The artful firm and the aesthetic moment in contemporary business and management theory. Aesthesis: International Journal of Art and Aesthetics in Management and Organizational Life 2 (2): 60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coase, R.E. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Couch, Robert B. and Joseph M. Spencer, 2013, “Economy suspended: the possibilities of a Badiouian business ethics”, Business Ethics: A European Review. Volume 22, Issue 4, October , Pages: 404–416,

  10. Cummings, Stephen, 2000, “Resurfacing an aesthetics of existence as an alternative to business ethics”, in the aesthetics of organization, eds. Linstead and Hopfl, New York: Sage.

  11. Derrida, Jacques, 1991, “Spurs: Nietzsche’s styles”, in a Derrida reader ed. Peggy Kamuf, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 353–377.

  12. Dobson, J. 2010. Aesthetic style as a postructural business ethic. Journal of Business Ethics 93 (3): 393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dobson, J. Nicolette Gorospe, Seung-Yeon Sunny Jeong, 2017, THIRD WAVE FEMINISM, ETHICS OF CARE, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: THE CASE OF GENDER QUOTAS ON CORPORATE BOARDS« in Alejo Jose J. Sisson (Ed.), Springer Handbook on Virtue Ethics in Business and Management. New York: Springer.

  14. Dyck, B., and J.M. Weber. 2006. Conventional versus radical moral agents. Organization Studies 27 (3): 429–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Engelbrecht, Schalk, 2012, “Radical business ethics: a critical and postmetaphysical manifesto” Business Ethics: A European Review, Volume 21, Issue 4, October, Pages: 339–352.

  16. Frazer, Elizabeth, and Nicola Lacey, 1994, “MacIntyre, feminism and the concept of practice” in John Horton and Susan Mendez ed.; On MacIntyre, Oxford University press.

  17. Frey, Bruno S. 2018. Economics of happiness. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gayford, Martin, 2010, “David Hockney’s iPad art”, The Telegraph, 20 Oct. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-features/8066839/David-Hockneys-iPad-art.html

  19. Genette, Gerard. 1999. The aesthetic relation. London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guillet de Monthoux, Pierre. 2004. The art firm. Stanford: Stanford University Press (Stanford Business Books).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Habermas, J., 1998, The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory, Cambridge mass; MIT Press.

  22. Hallward, Peter, 2001, Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil, (tanslators introduction.), New York: Verso, pp. vii-xxxvi.

  23. Hancock, P. 2005. Uncovering the semiotic in organizational aesthetics. Organization 12 (1): 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heidegger, Martin (1966). Discourse on thinking (J. M. Anderson & E. H. Freund, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.

  25. Heidegger, Martin. 1952. 2013, “the question concerning technology” (QCT), in the question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Helms Eleanor, and Dobson, J., 2016, “Heidegger’s Critique of Technology and the Contemporary Return to Artisan Business Activity”, Philosophy of Management, November 2016, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp. 203–220.

  27. Heywood, Leslie L., ed. 2006. The Women's movement today: An encyclopedia of third wave feminism, vol. Vol. 1. Greenwood: Westport.

  28. Hoffman, Michael W. 2014. Business ethics, ed. Frederic, Schwarts, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jensen, Michael, and William Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Volume 3, Issue 4, October 1976, Pages 305–360.

  30. Kant, Immanuel, 1790, Critique of Judgment, trans. James Creed Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon Press [1952].

  31. Kellner, Douglas, 1985, Modernity and Its Discontents, Columbia University Working Paper (http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/).

  32. King, Mathew. 2015. “Being and Virtuosness: Toward a platonic-Heideggerian virtue ethics”, in Hermberg and Gyllenhammer eds. Phenomenology and Virtue Ethics, London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Koehn, D. 2010. Ethics, morality, and art in the classroom: Positive and negative relations. Journal of Business Ethics Education 7: 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Koehn, D., and D. Elm. 2014. Aesthetics and business ethics. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ladkin, Donna. 2018. The aesthetic and its relation to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics January 147 (1): 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Layard, Richard. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Maitland, Ian, 1997, ‘Virtuous Markets: "The Market as School of the Virtues"’ Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1 (Jan., 1997), pp. 17–31.

  38. Miller, Merton H. 1986. Behavioral rationality in finance: The case of dividends. Journal of Business 59: 45.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Moore, Geoff, and Ron Beadle. 2006. In search of organizational virtue in business. Organization Studies 27 (3): 369–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nietzsche, Friedrich; 1888, The Will to Power, ed. Walter Kaufmann, trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale (New York: Random House, 1967) para 1067, pp. 449–50.

  41. Nietzsche, Friedrich; 1882, The Gay Science, ed. Walter Kaufmann, trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale (New York: Random House, 1974).

  42. Postrel, V. 2003. The substance of style. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Twomey, Jay, 2004, “Saint Paul: The Foundation of universalism” (book review), R&L,36.2 (summer).

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Dobson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

I hereby certify that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this project.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dobson, J. Envisioning the Aesthetic Firm. Philosophy of Management (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-020-00159-5

Download citation


  • Postructural
  • Badiou
  • Heidegger
  • Aesthetics
  • Technology
  • Theory of the firm