Notes
Anthony Carty, Critical International Law: Recent Trends in the Theory of International Law, 2 European J Intl L (1991) 1.
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld 542 U.S. 507 (2004).
Bankovic v. Belgium [2001] ECHR 890.
Carrie Menkel-Meadow, Why and How to Study Transnational Law, 1 U.C.IRVINE L Rev. 97
(2011) 104.
A. Behrami and B. Behrami v. France/R. Saramati v. France, Germany & Norway Joined App. Nos. 71412/01 & 78166/01 (Eur. Ct. H.R. May 2, 2007).
Case T-315/01, Kadi v. Council & Comm’n, 2005 E.C.R. II-3649.
John Hasnas, Back to the Future: From Critical Legal Studies Forward to Legal Realism, or How not to Miss the Point of the Indeterminacy Argument, 45 Duke LJ 132 (1995).
See Katherine Van Wezel Stone, The Post-War Paradigm in American Labor Law, 90 Yale LJ 7 (1981) 1509, 1558.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Sai Ramani Garimella: Assistant Professor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garimella, S.R. Prabhakar Singh & Benoit Mayer (eds.): Critical international law: post colonialism, postrealism and transnationalism. Indian Journal of International Law 55, 455–458 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-016-0023-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-016-0023-6