Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of a pump and treat system to addressing potential vapor intrusion risk in a karst terrane: design parameter optimization and performance evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainable Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vapor intrusion has become a great concern in residential areas where shallow groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds. Although active depressurization technologies such as sub-slab depressurization is the most frequently selected technology to reduce or eliminate exposure risks, such mitigation methods can hardly constitute the permanent remedy that eliminates or substantially reduces the level of contamination in groundwater that functions as the subsurface vapor source to acceptable-risk levels. This paper presents a case study in which a pump and treat (P&T) system is used as the long-term response to eliminate vapor intrusion risk in an area where contaminated groundwater in a non-karst terrain flows into a karst terrane. The underlying karst aquifer functions as an underdrain that limits the lateral and downgradient movement of the contaminated groundwater. Aquifer testing and a groundwater availability assessment helped optimize the groundwater extraction design so that the contaminated groundwater is captured in the contamination source area and prevented from flowing into the neighboring and hydraulically downgradient residential area. Performance of the installed P&T system was evaluated by comparing groundwater levels between the contamination source area and residential area and a groundwater capture analysis. An optimized pumping rate of 7.7 gallons per minute from three extraction wells resulted in the reversal of the groundwater flow in the study area. Because P&T systems are typically installed to either reduce contaminant concentration in groundwater or prevent contamination from spreading to uncontaminated areas, this P&T system expanded the P&T applications to include vapor intrusion risk mitigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gerhart JM, Lazorchick GJ (1988) Evaluation of the Ground-Water Resources of the Lower Susquehanna River Basin, Pennsylvania and Maryland, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2284

  • Glass DS, DiPilato J, Boger K (2018) Vapor intrusion mitigation: road map to successful sub-slab deressurization at sites with shallow water tables. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 37(5):1758–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, McHugh T, Beckley L, Lahvis M, DeVaull G, Jiang L (2020) Vapor intrusion investigations and decision-makingp: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 2020(54):7050–7069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh TE, Beckley L, Bailey D, Gorder K, Dettenmaier E, Rivera-Duarte I, Brock S, MacGregor IC (2012) Evaluation of vapor intrusion using controlled building pressure. Environ Sci Technol 46(9):4792–4799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennell KG, Scammell MK, McClean MD, Suuberg EM, Moradi A, Roghani M, Ames J, Friguglietti L, Indeglia PA, Shen R, Yao Y, Heiger-Bernays WJ (2016) Field data and numerical modeling: a multiple lines of evidence approach for assessing vapor intrusion exposure risks. Sci Total Environ 556:291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provoost J, Tillman FD, Weaver J, Reijnders L, Bronders J, Van Keer I, Swartjes F (2011) Vapour Intrusion into Buildings—A Literature Review. In Daniels, JA (Ed): Advances in Environmental Research, Vol. 5, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, NY, USA

  • USEPA (2015) OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air. Publication 9200.2–154, June

  • USEPA (2020) Superfund Remedy Report, 16th Edition, Office of Land and Emergency Management, EPA-542-R-20–001, July

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the project delivery team who collected all the data presented in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanfang Zhou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, S., Wang, H. & Zhou, W. Application of a pump and treat system to addressing potential vapor intrusion risk in a karst terrane: design parameter optimization and performance evaluation. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 8, 127 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00726-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00726-w

Keywords

Navigation