Abstract
Vulnerability assessment of aquifer units is vital in groundwater management and development. In this study, aquifer vulnerability was assessed via surficial resistivity measurements in Obot Akara Local Government area of Southern Nigeria using the GOD and AVI methods. In all, 19 vertical electrical soundings (VES) were made in the area using the Schlumberger electrode configuration with maximum current electrode spreads varying from 600 to 1000 m. The area is shown to comprise 3–4 geoelectric layers within the limit of the electrode spread utilized. The third geoelectric layer, interpreted as gravelly sands at some locations and sandy clay at other locations constitutes the major aquifer units in the area and has a thickness of 56.0–68.9 m. Based on the GOD index and AVI results, the hydrogeological units in the area are adjudged to have low to moderate vulnerability to contaminants. The little percentage high-vulnerability zone has been demarcated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abu-Bakr HA (2020) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in different types of aquifers. Agric Water Manag 240(2020):106275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106275
Akenji VN, Ako Ako A, Akoachere RAI, Takahiro H (2015) DRASTIC-GIS model for assessing vulnerability to pollution of the phreatic aquiferous formations in Douala-Cameroon. J Afr Earth Sci 102:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.11.001
Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardised system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. US-EPA Report 600/2-87-035
Avbovbo AA (1978) Tertiary lithostratigraphy of Niger Delta. Bull Am Assoc Pet Geol 62:297–306
Boufekane A, Saighi O (2013) Assessment of groundwater pollution by nitrates using intrinsic vulnerability methods: a case study of the Nile valley groundwater (Jijel, North-East Algeria). Afr J Environ Sci Technol 7(10):949–960. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2013.142
Brindha K, Elango L (2015) Cross comparison of five popular groundwater pollution vulnerability index approaches. J Hydrol 524:597–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.03.003
Chakravarthi V, Shankar GBK, Muralidharan D, Hari-narayana T, Sundararajan N (2007) An integrated geophysical approach for imaging sub-basalt sedimentary basins: case study of Jam River basin, India. Geophysics 72(6):B141–B147
Daly D, Warren W (1998) Mapping groundwater vulnerability: the Irish perspective. In: Robins NS (ed) Groundwater pollution, aquifer recharge and vulnerability. Geological Society London, Special Publications, vol 130, pp 179–190
Edet A (2013) An aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Benin Formation aquifer, Calabar, southeastern Nigeria, using DRASTIC and GIS approach. Environ Earth Sci 71:1747–1765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2581-y
Egboka BCE, Nwankwor GI, Orajaka IP, Ejiofor AO (1989) Principles and problems of environmental pollution of groundwater resources with case examples from developing countries. Environ Health Perspect 83:39–68
Ekanem AM (2020) Georesistivity modelling and appraisal of soil water retention capacity in Akwa Ibom State University main campus and its environs, Southern Nigeria. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00850-6
Ekanem AM, George NJ, Thomas JE, Nathaniel EU (2020) Empirical relations between aquifer geohydraulic-geoelectric properties derived from surficial resistivity measurements in parts of Akwa Ibom State, Southern Nigeria. Nat Resour Res 29(4):2635–2646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09606-1
Esu EO, Okereke CS, Edet AE (1999) A regional hydrostratigraphic study of Akwa Ibom State southeastern Nigeria. Glob J Pure Appl Sci 5(1):89–96
Falowo OO, Akindureni Y, Ojo O (2017) Groundwater assessment and its intrinsic vulnerability studies using aquifer vulnerability index and GOD methods. Int J Energy Environ Sci 2(5):103–116. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijees.20170205.13
Fienen MN, Arshad M (2016) The international scale of the groundwater issue. In: Jakeman AJ, Barreteau O, Hunt RJ, Rinaudo JD, Ross A (eds) Integrated groundwater management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9_2
Foster SSD (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: Duijvenbooden W, Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, Proc Info, vol 38, pp 69–86
Foster S, Hirata R (1988) Groundwater risk assessment - a methodology using available data. Lima: Pan American Center for Sanitary Engineering and Environmental Sciences (CEPIS). Technical report, Lima, Peru 1st edn
Foster S, Hirata R, Andreo B (2013) The aquifer pollution vulnerability concept: aid or impediment in promoting groundwater protection? Hydrogeol J 21(7):1389–1392
George NJ, Obianwu VI, Akpan AE, Obot IB (2010) Assessment of shallow aquiferous units and their coefficients of anisotropy in the coastal plain sands of Southern Ukanafun local government area, Akwa Ibom State, Southern Nigeria. Arch Phys Res 2:118–128
George NJ, Ibanga JI, Ubom AI (2015) Geoelectro-hydrogeological indices of evidence of ingress of saline water into freshwater in parts of coastal aquifers of Ikot Abasi, Southern Nigeria. J Afr Earth Sci 109:37–46
Ghazavi R, Ebrahimi Z (2015) Assessing groundwater vulnerability to contamination in an arid environment using DRASTIC and GOD models. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:2909–2918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0813-2
Gogu R, Dassargues A (2000) Current trend and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Environ Geol 39(6):549–559
Harter T, Walker LG (2001) Assessing vulnerability of groundwater. Vol 35, pp 9–17. http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/ddwem/dwsap/DWSAPindex.htm
Kazakis N, Voudouris K (2011) Comparison of three applied methods of groundwater vulnerability mapping: a case study from the Florina basin, Northern Greece. In: Lambrakis N, Stournaras G, Katsanou K (eds) Advances in the research of aquatic environment. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24076-8_42
Khan S, Cao Q, Zheng YM, Huang YZ, Zhu YG (2008) Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 152(3):686–692
Kumar A, Krishna AP (2020) Groundwater vulnerability and contamination risk assessment using GIS-based modified DRASTIC-LU model in hard rock aquifer system in India. Geocarto Int 35(11):1149–1178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2018.1557259
Machiwal D, Jha MK, Singh VP, Mohan C (2018) Assessment and mapping of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: current status and challenges. Earth Sci Rev 185:901–927
Madl-Szonyi J, Fule L (1998) Groundwater vulnerability assessment of the SW Trans-Danubian Central Range, Hungary. Environ Geol 35(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050287
Maxe L, Johansson P-O (1998) Assessing groundwater vulnerability using travel time and specific surface area as indicators. Hydrogeol J 6:441–449
Mbipom EW, Okwueze EE, Onwuegbeche AAA (1996) Estimation of transmissivity using VES data from Mbaise area of Nigeria. Niger J Phys 85:28–32
Mfonka ZN, Ngoupayou JR, Ndjigui P-D, Kpoumie A, Zammouri M, Ngouh AN, Mouncherou OF, Rakotondrabe F, Rasolomanana EH (2018) A GIS-Based DRASTIC and GOD models for assessing alterites aquifer of three experimental watersheds in Foumban (Western-Cameroon). Groundw Sustain Dev 7:250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2018.06.006
Murat V, Paradis D, Savard MM, Nastev M, Bourque E, Hamel A, Lefebvre R, Martel R (2003) Vulnérabilité à la nappe des aquifères fractures du Sud-ouest du Québec- Evaluation par les methods DRASTIC et GOD. Current Research, No. 2003-D3, p 14
Oroji B (2019) Groundwater vulnerability assessment with using GIS in Hamadan-Bahar plain, Iran. Appl Water Sci 9:196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1082-x
Reijers TJA, Petters SW (1987) Depositional environments and diagenesis of Albian Carbonates on the Calabar Flank, SE Nigeria. J Pet Geol 10(3):283–294
Short KC, Stauble AJ (1967) Outline geology of the Niger Delta. AAPG Bull 51:761–779
Stacher P (1995) Present understanding of the Niger Delta hydrocarbon habitat. In: Oti MN, Postma G (eds) Geology of deltas. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 257–267
Thirumalaivasan D, Karmegam M, Venugopal K (2003) AHP-DRASTIC: software for specific aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC model and GIS. Environ Model Softw 18:645–656
Uchegbu SN (2002) Issues and strategies in environmental planning and management in Nigeria. Spotlite Publishers, Enugu, p 184
Van Stempvoort D, Ewert L, Was-senaar L (1992) AVI: a method for groundwater protection mapping in the prairie provinces of Canada. Prairie Provinces Water Board Report 114, Regina, SK
Vrba J, Zaporozec A (1994) Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability, vol 16. International Contribution to Hydrogeology, Hannover, p 131
Zohdy AAR, Eaton GP, Mabey DR (1974) Application of surface geophysics to groundwater investigation. USGS techniques of water resources investigations, 02-D1. https://doi.org/10.3133/twri02D1
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank all the members of the Geophysics Research Group (GRG), Akwa Ibom State University and Prof A. E. Akpan of the Department of Physics (Applied Geophysics Programme), University of Calabar, for their supports especially during the field data collection and editing of the original manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there are no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ekanem, A.M. AVI- and GOD-based vulnerability assessment of aquifer units: a case study of parts of Akwa Ibom State, Southern Niger Delta, Nigeria. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 8, 29 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00628-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00628-x