Skip to main content

A geo-ethical logic for citizens and geoscientists

Abstract

The impacts of anthropogenic change do call for strengthening the socio-political and socio-economic anchorage of geoethical thinking. Geosciences are more than mere techno-scientific disciplines as, for example, geohydrology shows. Geoscience expertise ties geosciences and people's social lives. Geosciences are relevant for the societies' functioning, namely, to operate a technosphere at local, regional and planetary scales. Therefore, geoscience expertise includes a school of philosophical thinking called geoethics. Although initially designed for professional use, geoethics should support any citizen’s individual, professional and civic dealings. Nowadays, the technosphere is a vital feature of the contemporary Earth System (or ‘human niche’). In these contexts, conceptual benchmarks for geoethical thinking are described to address: (i) the operational limits of aspirational stipulations and (ii) a stronger socio-political anchorage of geoethical thinking. Methodologically, the present study relates geoethical thinking with the political philosophies of Bunge, Jonas and Kohlberg about people's social lives. Their works offer foundations for a broad application of geoethical thinking by providing benchmarks: Kohlberg's ‘hierarchy of societal coordination (moral adequacy)’, Bunge’s ‘balance of individual happiness (well-being) and duty’ and Jonas' ‘imperative of responsibility for agents of change’. These political philosophies can be combined with geoethical thinking (or geoethics). A ‘geo-ethical logic’ can be formulated, calling to act with: agent-centricity, virtue-focus, responsible-focus, reproducible/scientific knowledge, all-agent-inclusiveness and universal-rights-base. Whilst preserving the design of geoethics, the proposed geo-ethical logic strengthens the socio-political anchorage of geoethical thinking, and aspirational stipulations are benchmarked. Further study should aim to complement the given frame of socio-political benchmarks by socio-economic benchmarking.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. For the benefit of the reader, the word ‘geoethics’ is used for a specific configuration of geoethical thinking to distinguish variants of thought.

  2. Considering socio-economic dynamics is subject of ongoing studies of the author.

  3. …system behaviour >> sense-making >> action >> system behaviour >> sense-making >> action >> …

  4. The term ‘relativism’ was replaced by ‘pluralism’ to sharpen the meaning.

  5. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/.

References

Download references

Funding

No external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Bohle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bohle, M. A geo-ethical logic for citizens and geoscientists. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 7, 85 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-021-00557-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-021-00557-1

Keywords

  • Geoethics
  • Moral adequacy
  • Imperative of responsibility
  • Sense-making
  • Complex-adaptive
  • Social–ecological systems