Abstract
Community participation (CP) has become popular in development discourse and practice, particularly in relation to water resource management. Greater involvement of beneficiaries in decision-making and implementation of water management practices is expected to increase efficiency and equity. However, the lingering question remains—Does CP necessarily result in outcomes of greater beneficiary satisfaction? Relatively little is known about the linkage. This article seeks to examine the relationship between community participation and beneficiary satisfaction with the work of the water management committee. Four urban-based community operated water schemes in the city of Kisumu, Kenya, are used as empirical referent. We applied quantitative research methodology by conducting a detailed survey and logistic regression analytic technique to analyze the data. We used seven parameters/indicators to operationalize participation and one to ascertain satisfaction with the work of the water management committee. Our results indicate that five participatory variables correlate with beneficiary satisfaction with the work of the water management committees including provision of labor (p < .05), willingness to intervene against vandalism (p < .05), meeting attendance (p < .05), financial contribution (p < .05) and payments of water bills on time (p < .05). These findings suggest that managers of community water supplies projects together with development partners need to encourage the identified participatory variables as a means of augmenting beneficiary satisfaction and most importantly improving effectiveness/sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal B (2001) Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: an analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Dev 29(10):1623–1648
Ananga EO (2015) The role of community participation in water production and management: lessons from sustainable aid in Africa international sponsored water schemes in Kisumu, Kenya. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida
Ananga EO, Njoh AJ, Pappas C, Ananga OG (2017a) Examining the relationship between community participation and water handling hygiene practices in the informal neighborhoods of Kisumu Kenya. Habit Int 62(2017):1–10
Ananga EO, Njoh AJ, Anchang JY, Akiwumi FA (2017b) Participation-related factors influencing performance in four urban-based community-operated water schemes in Kisumu, Kenya. Commun Dev J 52(2):319–336
Anderson JA (1983) Logistic regression. Handb Stat 2:169–191
Banks B, Furey S (2016) What’s working, where, and for how long a 2016 water point update to the RWSN (2009) statistics. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402086n.Fisher
Bonsor HC, Oates N, Chilton PJ, Carter RC, Casey V, MacDonald AM, Bennie M (2015) A hidden crisis: strengthening the evidence base on the sustainability of rural groundwater supplies: results from a pilot study in Uganda
Brager G, Specht H, Torczyner JL (1987) Community organizing. Columbia University Press, New York
Bridgen P (2004) Evaluating the empowering potential of community-based health schemes: the case of community health policies in the UK since 1997. Commun Dev J 39(3):289–302
Central Bureau of Statistics (1999) Population census, ministry of planning and economic development. Government of Kenya (Nairobi Government Printers), Nairobi
Chambers R (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Dev 22(7):953–969
Chambers R (1997) Whose reality counts?: Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd (ITP), London
Chambers R (2007) Who counts? The quiet revolution of participation and numbers. IDS Working, Paper 296
Fonjong LN, Emmanuel NN, Fonchingong CC (2005) Rethinking the contribution of indigenous management in small-scale water provision among selected rural communities in Cameroon. Environ Dev Sustain 6(4):429–451
Gomez JD, Nakat AC (2002) Community participation in water and sanitation. Water Int 27(3):343–353
Gross B, Van Wijk C, Mukherjee N (2002) Linking sustainability with demand, gender and poverty. World Bank Technical
Harvey P, Reed R (2007) Community-managed water supplies in Africa: sustainable or dispensable? Commun Dev J 42(3):365–378
Isham J, Kähkönen S (2002) Institutional determinants of the impact of community-based water services: evidence from Sri Lanka and India. Econ Dev Cult Change 50(3):667–691
Kelly E, Lee K, Shields KF, Cronk R, Behnke N, Klug T, Bartram J (2017) The role of social capital and sense of ownership in rural community-managed water systems: qualitative evidence from Ghana, Kenya, and Zambia. J Rural Stud 56:156–166
Kisumu City Development Strategies (2013) Lake Victoria region city development strategies for improved urban environment and poverty reduction. Prepared by Kisumu City Council and Center for Development & Planning Management. http://www.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/3589_41974_kisumu_cds.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2013
Kleemeier E (2000) The impact of participation on sustainability: an analysis of the Malawi Rural Piped Scheme Program. World Dev 28(5):929–944
Laws of Kenya (2010) The constitution of Kenya. Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney General. https://www.kenyaembassy.com/pdfs/The%20Constitution%20of%20Kenya.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Manikutty S (1997) Community participation: so what? Evidence from a comparative study of two rural water supply and sanitation projects in India. Word Dev Policy Rev 15(2):115–140
Mansuri G, Rao V (2003) Community-based and-driven development: a critical review. World Bank Res Obs 19(1):1–39
Marks SJ, Davis J (2012) Does user participation lead to sense of ownership for rural water systems? Evidence from Kenya. World Dev 40(8):1569–1576
Mathbor G (2008) Effective community participation in coastal development. Lyceum Books, Chicago
Naiga R, Penker M, Hogl K (2015) Challenging pathways to safe water access in rural Uganda: from supply to demand-driven water governance. Int J Commons 9(1)237–260
Narayan D (1995) The contribution of people’s participation: evidence from 121 rural water supply projects. Environmentally sustainable development occasional paper series no. 1, The World Bank
Njoh AJ (2002) Self-help water supply in Cameroon—lessons on community participation in public works projects. The Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston
Onwuegbuzie AJ, Johnson RB (2004) Mixed method and mixed model research. In: Johnson RB, Christensen LB (eds) Educational research: quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, pp 408–431
Paul S (1987) Community participation in development projects: the World Bank experience. The World Bank discussion papers, no. 6, The World Bank, Washington, DC
Peet J (2003) Priceless: a survey of water. The Economist 3–5
Priscoli JD (2004) What is public participation in water resources management and why is it important? Water Int 29(2):221–227
Priscoli JD, Llamas MR (2001) International perspective in ethical dilemmas in the water industry. Navigating rough waters. American Water Works Association, Denver, pp 41–64
Prokopy LS (2005) The relationship between participation and project outcomes: evidence from rural water supply projects in India. World Dev 33(11):1801–1819
Prokopy LS (2009) Determinants and benefits of household level participation in rural drinking water projects in India. J Dev Stud 45(4):471–495
Roy B (2002) Villagers dump role in water supply. The Times of India, 2 Sep 2002
Sara J, Katz T (1998) Making rural water supply sustainable: report on the impact of project rules. The World Bank, Washington, DC
Schouten T, Moriarty P (2003) Community water, community management: from system to service in rural areas. International Technology Development Group, London
The World Bank – UNDP: Water and Sanitation Program (2001) 1999–2000 report, Water Supply and Sanitation Division, Washington, DC, USA
Uckrow K, Stephan Y (2012) Structure and functions of WASH Committee in rural areas: a guideline. arche noVa, Dresden
UN (2020) World Water Day 2020—water and climate change. https://www.unwater.org/world-water-day-2020-water-and-climate-change/. Accessed 3 May 2020
Whaley L, Cleaver F (2017) Can ‘functionality’ save the community management model of rural water supply? Water Resour Rural Dev 9:56–66
World Bank (1995) The World Bank participation sourcebook, The International Bank for reconstruction and development, Washington, DC
World Health Organization (2019) Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2017: special focus on inequalities. World Health Organization, Geneva
Yacoob M, Walker J (1991) Community management in water supply and sanitation project: cost and implication. Aqua J Int Water Supply Assoc 40(1):30–44
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ananga, E.O., Agong’, S.G., Acheampong, M. et al. Examining the effect of community participation on beneficiary satisfaction with the work of water management committee in urban community-based operated water schemes. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 6, 49 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00408-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00408-5