Skip to main content

Managing aquifer recharge and sustaining groundwater use: developing a capacity building program for creating local groundwater champions

Abstract

Participatory groundwater management is increasingly being recognised for its ability to address the challenges of equity, efficiency and sustainability. It can particularly help with effective engagement at the grassroots level for monitoring, recharging and managing the groundwater as a common pool resource. The main aim of this article is to discuss the training and management process used and the lessons learnt from a participatory groundwater management project, titled Managing Aquifer Recharge and Sustainable Groundwater Use through Village-level Intervention (MARVI). In this project, researchers, rural development facilitators and local villagers worked together to initiate participatory groundwater monitoring in 11 villages from the Dharta and Meghraj watersheds in Rajasthan and Gujarat, India. The study involved educating villagers through an intensive program of capacity building, wherein the villagers who participated in the program were called Bhujal Jaankars (BJs), a Hindi word meaning ‘groundwater informed’. The BJs were trained in their local settings through relevant theory and practical exercises, so that they could perform a geo-hydrological evaluation of their area, monitor groundwater and share their findings and experiences with their village community. The study has highlighted that with a well-designed program of capacity building and on-going support through training and nurturing, BJs can play an important role in monitoring watertable depth and other data for estimating groundwater recharge, leading to a sharing of the groundwater information with the local village community to influence the sustainable use of groundwater. Overall they can act as local champions for groundwater futures. Further, this study has demonstrated that BJ capacity building can help to provide a scientific basis for village level groundwater dialogue and assist village communities and other stakeholders to improve their decision making regarding groundwater use, crop selection, agronomy, recharge strategies and other aspects of sustainable groundwater management. Although the BJ program has been successful and BJs can act as a valuable interface between local communities and other stakeholders managed aquifer recharge activities, there still exists some challenges to the BJ programme, such as the need for mechanisms and funding sources that will sustain the BJs over the longer term; wider acceptance of BJs among scientific communities and policy makers; and the acceptance of the role and involvements of BJs in natural resources management programs of the State and Central governments in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Barthel R, Foster S, Villholth KG (2017) Interdisciplinary and participatory approaches: the key to effective groundwater. Hydrogeol J 25(7):1923–1926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Board CGroundW (2006) Dynamic ground water resources of India (as on March 2004). CGWB Publ. https://www.cgwb.gov.in/Documents/Dynamic-GW-Resources-2004.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2017

  • Central Ground Water Board (2011) Dynamic ground water resources of India (as on March 2009). CGWB Publ. https://www.cgwb.gov.in/Documents/Dynamic-GW-Resources-2011.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2017

  • Central Water Commission (CWC) (2013) Water and Related Statistics, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi, India. http://www.cwc.nic.in/main/downloads/Water%20and%20Related%20Statistics-2013.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2018

  • D’Souza R (2006) Water in British India: the making of a ‘Colonial Hydrology’. Hist Compass 4(4):621–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashora Y, Dillon P, Maheshwari B, Soni P, Dashora R, Davande S, Purohit RC, Mittal HK (2017) A simple method using farmers’ measurements applied to estimate check dam recharge in Rajasthan, India. Sust Water Resour Manag 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0185-5

  • DDWS (2006) Summary of nation-wide statistics from Rajiv Gandhi Drinking Water Mission, Department of Drinking Water Supply, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India

    Google Scholar 

  • DDWS (2009) Mid-term appraisal of 11th plan—rural water supply, mimeo, Department of Drinking Water Supply, Ministry of Water Resources, GoI, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon P (2005) Future management of aquifer recharge. Hydrogeol J 13(1):313–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon P, Gale I, Contreras S, Pavelic P, Evans R, Ward J (2009) Managing aquifer recharge and discharge to sustain irrigation livelihoods under water scarcity and climate change. IAHS Publ 330:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Directorate of Economics and Statistics (2016) State of Indian agriculture—2015–16. http://eands.dacnet.nic.in/PDF/State_of_Indian_Agriculture,2015-16.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2018

  • Gleitsmann BA, Kroma MM, Steenhuis T (2007) Analysis of a rural water supply project in three communities in Mali: participation and sustainability. In: Natural resources forum, vol 31(2). Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Wiley Online Library, pp 142–150

  • Kulkarni H, Shah M, Shankar V, P.S (2015) Shaping the contours of groundwater governance in India. J Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.11.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari B, Varua M, Ward J, Packham R, Chinnasamy P, Dashora Y, Dave S, Soni P, Dillon P, Purohit R et al (2014) The role of transdisciplinary approach and community participation in village scale groundwater management: insights from Gujarat and Rajasthan, India. Water 6:3386–3408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narain P, Khan MA (2006) Improving traditional techniques: India. Examples of successful experiences in safe drinking water, United Nations Office for South-South Cooperation, Chap. 3, vol 11. pp 37–49. http://165.65.7.68/GSSDAcademy/SIE/Vol11.aspx. Accessed 28 Dec 2017

  • NSSO (2006) Morbidity, healthcare and condition of the aged. Report no. 507 of the National Sample Survey 60th Round (January—June 2004), National Sample Survey Organisation, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1994) Institutional analysis, design principles and threats to sustainable community governance and management of commons. ICLARM Conf. Proc. no. 45, pp 34–50

  • Reddy VR, Reddy MS, Rout SK (2014) Groundwater governance: a tale of three participatory models in Andhra Pradesh, India. Water Altern 7(2):275–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist S, Chidambaranathan M, Escobar C, Wiesmann U, Zimmermann A (2007) Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: the role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. J Rural Stud 23(1):23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross A, Martinez-Santos P (2010) The challenge of groundwater governance: case studies from Spain and Australia. Reg Environ Change 10(4):299–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Mieg HA, Oswald JE (2000) Transdisciplinarity in groundwater management—towards mutual learning of science and society. Water Air Soil Pollut 123(1):477–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah T (2008) India’s groundwater irrigation economy: the challenge of balancing livelihoods and environment. In: Chopra K, Dayal V (eds) Handbook on environmental economics in India. Oxford University Press, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah T (2009) Taming the anarchy: groundwater governance in South Asia. Routledge, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah T (2014) Towards a managed aquifer Recharge strategy for Gujarat, India: an economist’s dialogue with hydro-geologists. J Hydrol 518:94–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert S, Burke J, Faures JM, Frenken K, Hoogeveen J, Döll P, Portmann FT (2010) Groundwater use for irrigation—a global inventory. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:1863–1880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varua ME, Ward JE, Maheshwari B, Oza S, Purohit R, Hakimuddin, Chinnasamy P (2016) Assisting community management of groundwater: Irrigator attitudes in two watersheds in Rajasthan and Gujarat, India. J Hydrol 537:171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma S, Krishnan K, Reddy AV, Reddy RK (2012) Andhra Pradesh farmer managed groundwater systems (APFAMGS)—a reality check. IWMI-tata program and water policy, IWMI, Sri Lanka, p 21. http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/iwmi-tata/PDFs/2012_Highlight-37.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2018

  • Ward J, Varua ME, Maheshwari B, Oza S, Purohit R, Dave S (2016) Exploring the relationship between subjective wellbeing and groundwater attitudes and practices of farmers in Rural India. J Hydrol 540:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010) Deep well and prudence: towards pragmatic action for addressing groundwater overexploitation in India; the World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, p 97

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank MARVI project team, particularly Dr A.S. Jodha, Dr H.K. Mittal and Dr S.R. Bhakar for their assistance during the study. Funding for this research was provided by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia. The support of Dr Evan Christen, Research Program Manager, Land and Water Resources, ACIAR is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Maheshwari.

Additional information

This article is part of the special issue on Managed Aquifer Recharge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jadeja, Y., Maheshwari, B., Packham, R. et al. Managing aquifer recharge and sustaining groundwater use: developing a capacity building program for creating local groundwater champions. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 4, 317–329 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0228-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0228-6

Keywords

  • Participatory water management
  • Groundwater
  • Watertable monitoring
  • Capacity building