Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) has gained attention as a promising strategy for preventing unintended adolescent pregnancies in the US. However, LARC use among adolescents at risk for unintended pregnancy remains low compared to women in their 20s. The purpose of the current study was to synthesize the empirical literature published between 2010 and 2018 identifying the facilitators of and barriers to adolescents’ (< age 20) LARC use in the US. Thirty quantitative and qualitative studies were included in the current systematic review. The facilitators of and barriers to adolescent LARC use fell within five themes: LARC method characteristics, individual characteristics, social networks, healthcare systems, and historical time and geographical region. Barriers to adolescent LARC use largely echoed those identified in previous research noting the barriers to LARC use among young adult women (e.g., navigation of healthcare system logistics, common adverse side effects associated with some LARC methods). However, qualitative studies identified adolescents’ mothers as central figures in helping adolescents successfully obtain the LARC methods they desired. Conversely, adolescents’ partners seemed to only play a minor role in adolescents’ contraceptive decisions. The findings also suggested some subpopulations of adolescents may be experiencing pressure to initiate LARC use or have less ability to have their LARC device removed if they wish to discontinue use. Adolescent health practitioners and clinicians should consider the unique social–environmental influences of adolescents’ contraceptive access and behaviors to best meet adolescents’ contraceptive needs and desires.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abma, J. C., & Martinez, G. M. (2017). Sexual activity and contraceptive use among adolescents in the United States, 2011–2015. National Health Statistics Reports,104, 1–23.
Abraham, M., Zhao, Q. M., & Peipert, J. F. (2015). Young age, nulliparity, and continuation of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Obstetrics and Gynecology,126(4), 823–829. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001036.
Alton, T. M., Brock, G. N., Yang, D., Wilking, D. A., Hertweck, S. P., & Loveless, M. B. (2012). Retrospective review of intrauterine device in adolescent and young women. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,25(3), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2012.01.005.
Amies Oelschlager, A.-M. E., Micks, E. A., Debiec, K. E., Nizamic, T., Mantrala, M. D., & Prager, S. W. (2014). Long acting reversible contraception in adolescents with cardiovascular conditions. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,27(6), 353–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2014.01.102.
Aoun, J., Dines, V. A., Stovall, D. W., Mete, M., Nelson, C. B., & Gomez-Lobo, V. (2014). Effects of age, parity, and device type on complications and discontinuation of intrauterine devices. Obstetrics and Gynecology,123(3), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000144.
Baldwin, M. K., & Edelman, A. B. (2013). The effect of long-acting reversible contraception on rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: A review. Journal of Adolescent Health,52(4, Supplement), S47–S53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.10.278.
Bayer, L. L., Jensen, J. T., Li, H., Nichols, M. D., & Bednarek, P. H. (2012). Adolescent experience with intrauterine device insertion and use: A retrospective cohort study. Contraception,86(5), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.03.014.
Berenson, A. B., Tan, A., & Hirth, J. M. (2015). Complications and continuation rates associated with 2 types of long-acting contraception. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,212(6), 761-e1.
Berenson, A. B., Tan, A., Hirth, J. M., & Wilkinson, G. S. (2013). Complications and continuation of intrauterine device use among commercially insured teenagers. Obstetrics & Gynecology,121(5), 951–958.
Berlan, E., Mizraji, K., & Bonny, A. E. (2016). Twelve-month discontinuation of etonogestrel implant in an outpatient pediatric setting. Contraception,94(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.030.
Brodie, N., Silberholz, E. A., Spector, N. D., & Pattishall, A. E. (2016). Important considerations in adolescent health maintenance: Long-acting reversible contraception, human papillomavirus vaccination, and heavy menstrual bleeding. Current Opinion in Pediatrics,28(6), 778–785. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000426.
Carr, S., & Espey, E. (2013). Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health,52(4, Supplement), S22–S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.017.
Coates, C., Gordon, C. M., & Simpson, T. (2018). A qualitative study exploring contraceptive practices and barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptive use in a sample of adolescents living in the southern United States. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,31(6), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2018.07.006.
Cohen, R., Sheeder, J., Arango, N., Teal, S. B., & Tocce, K. (2016). Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices. Contraception,93(2), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.001.
Committee on Adolescent Health Care Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Work Group. (2018). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 735. Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Obstetrics and Gynecology,131(5), 947–948. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002627.
Conn, V. S., Isaramalai, S., Rath, S., Jantarakupt, P., Wadhawan, R., & Dash, Y. (2003). Beyond MEDLINE for literature searches. Journal of Nursing Scholarship,35(2), 177–182.
Curtis, K. M. (2016). US Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use 2016. Recommendations and Reports. MMWR. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1.
Daniels, K., & Abma, J. C. (2018). Current contraceptive status among women aged 15–49: United States, 2015–2017. NCHS Data Brief, 327.
Davis, A. J. (2011). Intrauterine devices in adolescents. Current Opinion in Pediatrics,23(5), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834a99d8.
Diaz, V. A., Hughes, N., Dickerson, L. M., Wessell, A. M., & Carek, P. J. (2011). Clinician knowledge about use of intrauterine devices in adolescents in South Carolina AHEC. Family Medicine,43(6), 407–411.
Diedrich, J. T., Klein, D. A., & Peipert, J. F. (2017). Long-acting reversible contraception in adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,216(4), 364.e1–364.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.024.
Finer, L. B., & Philbin, J. M. (2014). Trends in ages at key reproductive transitions in the United States, 1951–2010. Women’s Health Issues,24(3), e271–e279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.02.002.
Fontenot, H. B., & Fantasia, H. C. (2015). Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents. Nursing for Women’s Health,19(3), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-486X.12207.
Friedman, J. O. (2015). Factors associated with contraceptive satisfaction in adolescent women using the IUD. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,28(1), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2014.02.015.
Godfrey, E. M., Memmel, L. M., Neustadt, A., Shah, M., Nicosia, A., Moorthie, M., et al. (2010). Intrauterine contraception for adolescents aged 14–18 years: A multicenter randomized pilot study of Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to the copper T 380A. Contraception,81(2), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.09.004.
Guttmacher Institute. (2019, April 1). Minors’ access to contraceptive services. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from Guttmacher Institute website https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/minors-access-contraceptive-services.
Heikinheimo, O., Gissler, M., & Suhonen, S. (2008). Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion. Contraception,78(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2008.03.013.
Higgins, J. A. (2014). Celebration meets caution: Long acting reversible contraception (LARC)’s boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach. Contraception,89(4), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.027.
Hopkins, B. (2017). Barriers to health care providers’ provision of long-acting reversible contraception to adolescent and nulliparous young women. Nursing for Women’s Health,21(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2017.02.007.
Horwitz, M. E. M., Ross-Degnan, D., & Pace, L. E. (2019). Contraceptive initiation among women in the United States: Timing, methods used, and pregnancy outcomes. Pediatrics,143(2), e20182463. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-2463.
Iddings, A., & Omar, H. (2015). Revisiting menstrual bleeding patterns in adolescents using etonogestrel (ENG) implant. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health,8, 71–74.
Jatlaoui, T. C., Riley, H. E. M., & Curtis, K. M. (2017). The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: A systematic review. Contraception,95(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.006.
Kavanaugh, M. L., Frohwirth, L., Jerman, J., Popkin, R., & Ethier, K. (2013). Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: Patient and provider perspectives. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,26(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2012.10.006.
Kohn, J. E., Hacker, J. G., Rousselle, M. A., & Gold, M. (2012). Knowledge and likelihood to recommend intrauterine devices for adolescents among school-based health center providers. Journal of Adolescent Health,51(4), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.024.
Kumar, N., & Brown, J. D. (2016). Access barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptives for adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health,59(3), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.039.
Lindberg, L., Santelli, J., & Desai, S. (2016). Understanding the decline in adolescent fertility in the United States, 2007–2012. Journal of Adolescent Health,59(5), 577–583.
Lohr, P. A., Lyus, R., & Prager, S. (2017). Use of intrauterine devices in nulliparous women. Contraception,95(6), 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.08.011.
Luna, Z., & Luker, K. (2013). Reproductive justice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science,9, 327–352.
Maslyanskaya, S., Coupey, S. M., Chhabra, R., & Khan, U. I. (2016). Predictors of early discontinuation of effective contraception by adolescents at high risk of pregnancy. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,29(3), 269–275.
McNicholas, C., & Peipert, J. F. (2012). Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) for adolescents. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology,24(5), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835686d5.
Melo, J., Peters, M., Teal, S., & Guiahi, M. (2015). Adolescent and young women’s contraceptive decision-making processes: Choosing “The Best Method for Her”. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,28(4), 224–228.
Mestad, R., Secura, G., Allsworth, J. E., Madden, T., Zhao, Q., & Peipert, J. F. (2011). Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception,84(5), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001.
Murphy, M. K., Burke, P. J., & Haider, S. (2017). A qualitative application of diffusion of innovations to adolescents’ perceptions of long-acting reversible contraception’s attributes. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,30(4), 484–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2016.11.005.
O’Sullivan, L. F., Udell, W., Montrose, V. A., Antoniello, P., & Hoffman, S. (2010). A cognitive analysis of college students’ explanations for engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39(5), 1121–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9493-7.
Obijuru, L., Bumpus, S., Auinger, P., & Baldwin, C. D. (2016). Etonogestrel implants in adolescents: Experience, satisfaction, and continuation. Journal of Adolescent Health,58(3), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.10.254.
Ott, M. A., & Sucato, G. S. (2014). Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics,134(4), e1257–e1281.
Patchen, L., & Berggren, E. K. (2011). Use of the copper T380A intrauterine device by adolescent mothers: Continuation and method failure. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,24(2), 71–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2010.07.010.
Pazol, K., Daniels, K., Romero, L., Warner, L., & Barfield, W. (2016). Trends in long-acting reversible contraception use in adolescents and young adults: New estimates accounting for sexual experience. Journal of Adolescent Health,59(4), 438–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.05.018.
Peipert, J. F., Madden, T., Allsworth, J. E., & Secura, G. M. (2012). Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception. Obstetrics and Gynecology,120(6), 1291–1297.
Pritt, N. M., Norris, A. H., & Berlan, E. D. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to adolescents’ use of long-acting reversible contraceptives. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,30(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2016.07.002.
Reddy, D. M., Fleming, R., & Swain, C. (2002). Effect of mandatory parental notification on adolescent girls’ use of sexual health care services. JAMA,288(6), 710–714. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.6.710.
Romero, L., Pazol, K., Warner, L., Gavin, L., Moskosky, S., Besera, G., et al. (2015). Vital signs: Trends in use of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescents aged 15–19 years seeking contraceptive services—United States, 2005–2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,64(13), 363–369.
Rose, S. B., & Lawton, B. A. (2012). Impact of long-acting reversible contraception on return for repeat abortion. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,206(1), 37.e1–37.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.102.
Rubin, S. E., Felsher, M., Korich, F., & Jacobs, A. M. (2016). Urban adolescents’ and young adults’ decision-making process around selection of intrauterine contraception. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,29(3), 234–239.
Schmidt, E. O., James, A., Curran, K. M., Peipert, J. F., & Madden, T. (2015). Adolescent experiences with intrauterine devices: A qualitative study. Journal of Adolescent Health,57(4), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.05.001.
Secura, G. M., Madden, T., McNicholas, C., Mullersman, J., Buckel, C. M., Zhao, Q., et al. (2014). Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and adolescent pregnancy. The New England Journal of Medicine, Boston,371(14), 1316–1323. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1400506.
Secura, G. M., & McNicholas, C. (2013). Long-acting reversible contraceptive use among adolescents prevents unintended pregnancy: A look at the evidence. Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 8(4), 297. Retrieved from Health Reference Center Academic.
Sedgh, G., Finer, L. B., Bankole, A., Eilers, M. A., & Singh, S. (2015). Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: Levels and recent trends. Journal of Adolescent Health,56(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.007.
Stanwood, N. L., Garrett, J. M., & Konrad, T. R. (2002). Obstetrician–gynecologists and the intrauterine device: A survey of attitudes and practice. Obstetrics and Gynecology,99(2), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01726-4.
Sznajder, K. K., Tomaszewski, K. S., Burke, A. E., & Trent, M. (2017). Incidence of discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent and young adult women served by an urban primary care clinic. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,30(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2016.06.012.
Teal, S. B., & Romer, S. E. (2013). Awareness of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health,52(4, Supplement), S35–S39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.013.
Teal, S. B., & Sheeder, J. (2012). IUD use in adolescent mothers: Retention, failure and reasons for discontinuation. Contraception,85(3), 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.001.
Tocce, K., Sheeder, J., Python, J., & Teal, S. B. (2012a). Long acting reversible contraception in postpartum adolescents: Early initiation of etonogestrel implant is superior to IUDs in the outpatient setting. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,25(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2011.09.003.
Tocce, K. M., Sheeder, J. L., & Teal, S. B. (2012b). Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: Do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,206(6), 481.e1–481.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.015.
Tomlin, K., Bambulas, T., Sutton, M., Pazdernik, V., & Coonrod, D. V. (2017). Motivational interviewing to promote long-acting reversible contraception in postpartum adolescents. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,30(3), 383–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2016.11.001.
Weston, M. R. S., Martins, S. L., Neustadt, A. B., & Gilliam, M. L. (2012). Factors influencing uptake of intrauterine devices among postpartum adolescents: A qualitative study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,206(1), 40.e1–40.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.094.
Williams, R. L., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2013). Dual use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and condoms among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health,52(4, Supplement), S29–S34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.002.
Wilson, S. F., Degaiffier, N., Ratcliffe, S. J., & Schreiber, C. A. (2016). Peer counselling for the promotion of long-acting, reversible contraception among adolescents: A randomised, controlled trial. The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception,21(5), 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1214698.
This research received support from Grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: T32HD049302 and K01HD091416. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Hendrick, C.E., Cone, J.N., Cirullo, J. et al. Determinants of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Initial and Continued Use Among Adolescents in the United States. Adolescent Res Rev 5, 243–279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00126-w
- Long-acting reversible contraception
- Adolescent pregnancy
- Systematic review