Webs of Support: An Integrative Framework of Relationships, Social Networks, and Social Support for Positive Youth Development
Supportive relationships promote positive academic, behavioral, and psychological outcomes, while also buffering against negative outcomes. Traditionally, there has been a schism in how developmental scientists study relationships, with studies focused either on relationship quality and supports within dyads or general structures of relationships and social capital across social networks. While these lines of research provide insight into the power of relationships, resources, and networks for youth, they have not fully captured how relationships and resources operate in a relational developmental system. Drawing from relationship, social support, social capital, and social network literatures, this article presents a new framework, webs of support, to actualize how relationships and resources optimally operate to promote more accurate examinations of how adolescents gain the developmental supports necessary to thrive. This article also discusses implications and poses larger questions about the use of this framework in research and practice.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Renee Spencer, Professor at the Boston University School of Social Work, and Dr. Nancy Deutsch, Professor at the University of Virginia Curry School of Education, for sharing their expertise and thoughtful feedback. Thank you also to Dr. Michael Little, Creative Director and Rebeca Sandu, PhD Researcher at the Dartington Social Research Unit for their thoughtful review of our early work. Special thanks to all the team members at the Center for Promise who participated in discussions throughout the creation of this brief.
Both authors had conducted research separately which led them to this concept. SV took the primary role in writing the article, designing the figures, and responding to reviewers. JZ primarily conceived the name and concept of webs of support and participated in writing and editing the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final version of this article.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Both authors report no conflicts of interest.
- Bokhorst, C. L., Sumter, S. R., & Westenberg, P. M. (2010). Social support from parents, friends, classmates, and teachers in children and adolescents aged 9 to 18 years: who is perceived as most supportive? Social Development, 19, 417–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00540.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., Vol. 1). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Brown, B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd edn., pp. 363–394). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Center for Promise. (2015). Don’t quit on me: What young people who left school say about the power of relationships. Washington, DC: America’s Promise Alliance.Google Scholar
- Curran, E. (2007). The relationship between social capital and substance use by high school students. Journal of Alcohol & Drug Education, 51, 59–73.Google Scholar
- Cutrona, C. E. (2000). Social support principles for strengthening families. In J. Canavan, P. Dolan & J. Pinkerton (Eds.), Family support in disadvantaged families (pp. 103–122). Dublin: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Dolan, P., & McGrath, B. (2006). Enhancing support for young people in need: Reflections on informal and formal sources of helping. In P. Dolan, J. Pinkerton, & J. Canavan (Eds.), Family support as reflective practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publications.Google Scholar
- Evans, W., & Mason, A. (1996). Factors associated with gang involvement among incarcerated youth. Journal of Gang Research, 3(4), 31–40.Google Scholar
- Harris, J. R. (1998). The Nurture Assumption. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Jankowski, M. S. (2001). Islands in the street: Gangs and american urban society. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Keller, T. E., & Blakeslee, J. E. (2014). Social networks and mentoring. In D. L. Dubois & M. K. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 63–82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., & Theokas, C. (Eds.). (2005a). Positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 1–144.Google Scholar
- Lerner, R. M., Theokas, C., & Jelicic, H. (2005b). Youth as active agents in their own positive development: A developmental systems perspective. In W. Greve, K. Rothermund, & D. Wentura (Eds.), The adaptive self: Personal continuity and intentional self-development. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
- Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Bowers, E. P., & Geldhof, G. J. (2015). Positive youth development and relational developmental systems. In W. F. Overton & P. C. Molenaar (Eds.), Theory and method: Volume 1 of the Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th edn., pp. 607–651). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Lieberman, M. (2013). Social. New York, NY: Crown.Google Scholar
- Puntnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, J. E., & DuBois, D. L. (2006). Understanding and facilitating the youth mentoring movement. Social Policy Report, 20, 3–19. http://www.srcd.org/.
- Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 571–645). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Varga, S. M., Johnson, H. E., Yu, M. B., Deutsch, N. L., & Futch Ehrlich, V. A. (unpublished data).“It’s going to help me in life”: Forms, sources, and functions of social support for youth in relationships with non-parental adults.Google Scholar
- Varga, S. M., Yu, M. B., Johnson, H. E., Deutsch, N. L., & Futch Ehrlich, V. A. (unpublished data). Deconstructing social capital in youth-adult relationships.Google Scholar
- Weiss, A. R., & Westmoreland, H. (2006). Family and community engagement in Boston Public Schools: 1995–2006. In S. P. Reville & C. Coggins (Eds.), A decade of urban school reform: Persistence and progress in the Boston Public Schools (pp. 219–242). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
- Yu, M. B., Johnson, H. E., Deutsch, N. L., & Varga, S. M. (2016). “She calls me by my last name”: Exploring adolescent perceptions of positive teacher-student relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1–31.Google Scholar
- Zaff, J. F., Pufall Jones, E., Donlan, A. E., & Anderson, S. (2016). Comprehensive community initiatives creating supportive youth systems: A theoretical rational for creating youth-focused CCIs. In J. F. Zaff, E. Pufall Jones, A. E. Donlan & S. Anderson (Eds.), Comprehensive community initiatives for positive youth development (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar