Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Study on Mechanical and Deformation Characteristics of Geogrid-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to further analyze the mechanical and deformation characteristics of geogrid-reinforced soil retaining wall in the high backfill road section, this study experimentally investigates the effects of retaining wall slope, reinforcement layers, and reinforcement position on the bearing capacity and deformation characteristics of geogrid-reinforced soil retaining walls. The distribution of earth pressure in the reinforced soil retaining wall is also analyzed. The test results indicate that the ultimate bearing capacity of the retaining wall can be effectively improved by increasing the geogrid layers. The overall stability of the retaining wall decreases as the slope increases. When the number of reinforcement layers is consistent, the arrangement of geogrid in the upper part of the retaining wall can better control the deformation of the retaining wall and enhance the overall stability of the retaining wall. Under the vertical load, the horizontal displacement of the upper part of the wall is larger than that of the lower part, and the maximum horizontal displacement of the wall occurs at the top of the wall. The vertical earth pressure is not completely transmitted along the vertical direction but is transmitted downward along a certain diffusion angle. The growth rate of the upper earth pressure decreases gradually compared to that of the lower earth pressure as the load increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Zou C, Wang YM, Lin JY, Chen YK (2016) Creep behaviors and constitutive model for high density polyethylene geogrid and its application to reinforced soil retaining wall on soft soil foundation. Constr Build Mater 114:763–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gao JL, Liu L, Zhang YP, Xie XL (2022) Deformation mechanism and soil evolution analysis based on different types geogrid reinforced foundation. Constr Build Mater 331:127322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang JQ, Wang ML, Tang Y, Qi HX (2024) Analysis of pull-out test of reinforced soil interface under high, medium and low pull-out rates. Industrial Constr, 1–12

  4. Du W, Nie RS, Qi YL, Ruan B, Mo F (2024) Investigation on the static performance of geogrid reinforced aeolian sand railway embankment: field test and discrete element simulation. Geotext Geomembr 52(4):736–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim YJ, Jung HS, Lee YJ, Oh DW, Son M, Yoon HH (2020) Behaviour Analysis of Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall According to Laboratory Scale Test. Appl Sci 10(3):901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Niu XD, Yang GQ, Wang H, Ding S, Feng F (2021) Field tests on structural properties of reinforced retaining walls with different panels. Rock Soil Mech 42(01):245–254

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erol G, Murat H (2023) Estimation of Horizontal Displacements for Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Wall. E3S Web of Conferences, 368

  8. Ma XF (2017) Numerical Simulation of deformation characteristics of Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall with assembled panel based on shaking table model test. Southwest Jiaotong University

  9. Balakrishnan S, Viswanadham B (2019) Centrifuge model studies on the performance of soil walls reinforced with sand-cushioned geogrid layers. Geotext Geomembr 47(6):803–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu P, Jiang GL, Wang N, Lei T, Wang ZM (2018) Centrifugal model test on influence of relative compactness on reinforced soil retaining walls. Rock Soil Mech 39(11):4010–4016

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lu L, Chen B, Wang ZJ, Wang S, Katsuhiko A (2024) Study on seismic stability and performance of reconstruction embankment using geogrid reinforced soil technology. Transp Geotechnics 44:101148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ren FF, Xu H, Ji YJ, Huang QQ, Tian X (2022) Experimental study on the mechanical behavior of shored mechanically stabilized earth walls for widening existing reinforced embankments. Geotext Geomembr 50(4):737–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li LH, Shi AN, Xiao HL, Hu Z, Yang JC (2018) Model test and mechanical properties study of reinforced soil retaining wall. Rock Soil Mech 39(12):4360–4368

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang H, Yang GQ, Wang ZJ, Liu WC (2020) Static structural behavior of geogrid reinforced soil retaining walls with a deformation buffer zone. Geotext Geomembr 48(3):374–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu P, Hatami K, Bao JJ, Li T (2020) Bearing capacity and failure mechanisms of two-tiered reinforced soil retaining walls under footing load. Comput Geotech, 128

  16. Wang JQ, Zhang LL, Lai Y, Lu ML, Ye B (2019) Large-scale model tests on static and dynamic mechanical characteristics of reinforced soil retaining wall. Rock Soil Mech 40(02):497–505

    Google Scholar 

  17. Duan JY, Yang GL, Lin YL, Cheng XT, Dai ZH (2021) Experimental investigation of a reinforced soil retaining wall with a flexible geogrid-wrapped ecological bag facing. Geotext Geomembr 49(01):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li LH, Yu CD, Xiao HL, Feng WQ, Ma Q (2020) Experimental study on the reinforced fly ash and sand retaining wall under static load. Constr Build Mater, 248

  19. Yang GQ, Niu XD, Zhou SG, Li AH, Wang ZM (2021) Experimental study on structural behavior of composite integral rigid panel reinforced soil retaining wall. Rock Soil Mech 42(07):1794–1802

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abbas BJ, Khuzaie HMAA, Aziz HY (2022) Nonlinear Investigation of Behavior of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Retaining Wall Using FEM, Muthanna International Conference on Engineering Science and Technology (MICEST), Samawah, Iraq, 2022, 89–95

  21. Zhou J, Xie XB, Jiang J, Zhang J (2015) Study on deformation characteristics and influencing factors of wrapped reinforced soil retaining wall. Chin J Rock Mechan Eng 34(01):148–154

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yazdandoust M, Taimouri ABB (2022) Performance of two-tiered reinforced-soil retaining walls under strip footing load. Geotext Geomembr 50(4):545–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nie GL, Chen XH, Zhu HW (2017) Study on seismic performance and applicable conditions of flexible reinforced retaining wall. Railway Eng 57(12):85–88

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bai LW, Fang PF, Hong CC, Lin YL, Zeng Y (2023) Study on construction mechanical properties of reinforced gabion composite retaining wall. Subgrade Eng, (06): 122–127

  25. Xu H, Xia L, Ren X, Chen ZY, Zhang XB (2021) Experimental study on reinforced soil retaining wall of high embankment. J Highway Transp Res Dev 38(06):70–77

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu YL, Chen RY, Wu LM, Xu Q, Zhan ZJ (2022) Reinforcement placement on mechanics and deformation of stepped reinforced retaining wall experimental study of characteristics. Appl Rheology 32(1):155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gao A, Zhang MX, Zhu HC, Jiang SW (2016) Model test of reinforced geocell embankment under cyclic load and static load. Rock Soil Mech 37(7):1921–19281946

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sun Z, Zhang MX, Jiang SW (2015) Model test of geocell reinforced sand embankment under strip load. Chin J Geotech Eng 37(S2):170–175

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52308344, 42077249), the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students of Hefei University of Technology (X202310359210), the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2308085QE190), the Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology (Beijing Institute of Technology) (KFJJ23-05 M), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JZ2023HGTA0193, JZ2023HGQA0094).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Yalin Zhu, Zijian Zhan and Panpan Guo. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yin Hong, Min He, and Renyi Chen. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panpan Guo.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Y., Zhan, Z., Hong, Y. et al. Experimental Study on Mechanical and Deformation Characteristics of Geogrid-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 10, 74 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-024-00585-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-024-00585-9

Keywords

Navigation