Skip to main content

The utility of a bioethics doctorate: results of a survey of graduates and students having completed All-but-Dissertation Requirements (ABD) from US bioethics doctoral programs

Abstract

In the United States (US), the field of bioethics has expanded over the last two decades. Several institutions offer graduate-level training at both the masters and doctoral level. However, a lack of published literature on the outcomes of doctoral training in bioethics from the perspective of graduates exists. Researchers conducted an online survey of doctoral students who had finished all doctoral requirements but their dissertation (ABD), as well as doctoral graduates, of four US-based institutions to ascertain their perspectives on a number of items regarding their doctoral training and their perception of how that training prepared them for their current role in the workforce. Responses from 34 participants were assessed. Respondents had positive overall views on the utility of a bioethics doctorate and the educational training they received in their respective programs. A number of areas for improvement were identified, including better structured clinical ethics training, greater opportunities for research and publishing, and having the ability to teach during their doctoral program, as well as formal pedagogy training. Greater exposure to clinical ethics consultation during the doctoral program was associated with feeling fully prepared as a clinical ethics consultant. This is the first study to assess the perspectives of bioethics doctoral graduates and ABD students regarding the utility of a bioethics doctorate. Per the perspectives of graduates and ABD students, bioethics doctorates are important and effective to train professional bioethicists. We recommend that a few key changes to these programs’ curricula can further bolster their effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. n.d. Eligibility for Healthcare Ethics Consultant-Certified Examination. Retrieved from https://heccertification.org/exam/eligibility. Accessed 1 May 2021

  • Borry, P., P. Schotsmans, and K. Dierickx. 2004. What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1): 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borry, P., P. Schotsmans, and K. Dierickx. 2005. The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics. Bioethics 19 (1): 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinical Ethics Consultation Affairs Committee. 2015. Improving Competencies in Clinical Ethics Consultation: An Education Guide, 2nd ed. Chicago: American Society of Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinical Ethics Consultation Affairs Committee. 2017. Addressing Patient-Centered Ethical Issues in Health Care: A Case-Based Study Guide for. Chicago: American Society of Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Core Competencies Task Force. 2011. Core Competencies for Healthcare Ethics Consultation, 2nd ed. Chicago: American Society of Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R., J. Ives, and M. Dunn. 2015. A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies. BMC Medical Ethics 16: 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer, S.R. 2018. Should PhD students teach? Psychology Teaching Review 24 (2): 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H.F., and S.E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives, J., Dunn, M., Molewijk B., Schildmann, J., Bærøe, K., Frith, L., … Widdershoven, G. 2018. Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus. BMC Medical Ethics 19(1), 68.

  • Potter, J., D. Hurst, C. Trani, A. Clatty, and S. Stockey. 2019. The utility of a bioethics doctorate: Graduates’ perspectives. The Journal of Medical Humanities 40 (4): 473–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Hurst.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hurst, D.J., Potter, J., Clatty, A. et al. The utility of a bioethics doctorate: results of a survey of graduates and students having completed All-but-Dissertation Requirements (ABD) from US bioethics doctoral programs. International Journal of Ethics Education 7, 21–34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-021-00137-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-021-00137-z

Keywords

  • Bioethics
  • Doctorate
  • Education
  • Ethics
  • Mixed-methods research
  • Outcomes