Advertisement

Economia Politica

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 111–138 | Cite as

Redistribution and stabilisation through the EU budget

  • Paolo PasimeniEmail author
  • Stéphanie Riso
Original Paper
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

This paper measures the capacity of the EU budget to operate two traditional functions of public finances: redistribution and stabilisation. It uses a large dataset covering all actual revenues and expenditures of the budget, over 16 years (from 2000 to 2015) in each Member State of the EU. It finds that, for every € 1000 difference in income per capita across the EU, € 9 is offset by lower contributions to the budget and € 3 is offset by higher expenditures by the budget; the overall equalising effect is small and mainly generated by the revenue side, in particular by the national contribution based on GNI and VAT. The budget is not particularly responsive to changing economic conditions: a fall in income per capita of € 1000 determines a reduction of € 8 in the per capita contribution paid to the common budget, while the expenditure side is irresponsive. The analysis also shows that the various corrections mechanisms applied over time to the revenue side of the budget have reduced its redistributive and stabilisation capacity.

Keywords

European Union Budget Redistribution Stabilisation 

JEL Classification

E61 E62 H11 H61 H77 

References

  1. Asdrubali, P., & Kim, S. (2008). The economic effects of the EU budget: A VAR analysis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(5), 933–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailer, S., Mattila, M., & Schneider, G. (2015). Money makes the EU go round: The objective foundations of conflict in the Council of Ministers. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(3), 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, M. W. (2001). A creeping transformation? The European Commission and the management of EU structural funds in Germany. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer, M. W., Graham, J. D., & Becker, S. (2016). The EU budget system after Lisbon: How the European Parliament lost power and how it may compensate (somewhat) for it. ZSE Zeitschrift für Staats-und Europawissenschaften|Journal for Comparative Government and European Policy, 13(4), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayoumi, T., & Masson, P. (1995). Liability-creating versus non-liability creating fiscal stabilisation policies: Ricardian equivalence, fiscal stabilization, and EMU. Economic Journal, 108, 1026–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, S., Bauer, M. W., & De Feo, A. (2017). The new politics of the European Union budget. Glashütte: Nomos.Google Scholar
  7. Benedetto, G. (2017a). Institutions and the route to reform of the European Union’s budget revenue, 1970–2017. Empirica, 44(4), 615–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benedetto, G. (2017b). Power, money and reversion points: The European Union’s annual budgets since 2010. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(5), 633–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benedetto, G., & Hoyland, B. (2007). The EU annual budgetary procedure: The existing rules and proposed reforms of the convention and intergovernmental conference 2002–2004. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 565–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benedetto, G., & Milio, S. (2012). European Union budget reform: Institutions, policy and economic crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cipriani, G. (2014). Financing the EU budget: Moving forward or backwards?. Belgium: CEPS Paperback.Google Scholar
  12. Cipriani, G., & Pisani, S. (2004). The European budget: An alternative to budgetary balances to assess benefits for the member states, Working Paper No339. Pavia: Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.Google Scholar
  13. Citi, M. (2013). EU budgetary dynamics: Incremental or punctuated equilibrium? Journal of European Public Policy, 20(8), 1157–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Citi, M. (2015). European Union budget politics: Explaining stability and change in spending allocations. European Union Politics, 16(2), 260–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Citi, M. (2017). EU budgetary politics and the paradox of juste retour. In S. Becker, M. W. Bauer, & A. De Feo (Eds.), The new politics of the European Union budget (pp. 83–102). Glashütte: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. D’Apice, P. (2015). Cross-border flows operated through the EU budget: An overview. Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission. Discussion Papers 19. December 2015. Brussels.Google Scholar
  17. Enderlein, H., Lindner, J., & Calvo-Gonzalez, O, Ritter, R. (2005). The EU budgetHow much scope for institutional reform? ECB Occasional Paper No. 27.Google Scholar
  18. Escolano, J., Benedek, D., Jin, H., Granados, C. M., Nozaki, M., Pereira, J., et al. (2014). Distribution of fiscal responsibilities in federations. In Cottarelli & Guerguil (Eds.), Designing a European Fiscal Union: Lessons from the experience of Fiscal Federations. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. de la Fuente, A., & Doménech, R. (2001). The redistributive effects of the EU budget: An analysis and proposal for reform. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(2), 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feyrer, J., & Sacerdote, B. (2013). How much would us style fiscal integration buffer european unemployment and income shocks?(a comparative empirical analysis). The American Economic Review, 103(3), 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Groot, L., & Zonneveld, E. (2013). European union budget contributions and expenditures: A Lorenz curve approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(4), 649–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heinemann, F. (2015). Strategies for a European EU Budget. In D. Buettner & F. Thöne (Eds.), The future of EU-finances. Cologne: FiFo Institute for Public Economics, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
  23. Heinemann, F., Mohl, P., & Osterloh, S. (2008). Reform options for the EU own resources system (Vol (Vol. 40)). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heinemann, F., Mohl, P., & Osterloh, S. (2010). Reforming the EU Budget: Reconciling Needs with Political-Economic Constraints. J Eur Integr, 32(1), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laffan, B. (2000). The big budgetary bargains: From negotiation to authority. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(5), 725–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laffan, B., & Shackleton, M. (2000). The budget. Policy-making in the European Union, pp. 191–212.Google Scholar
  27. Le Cacheux, J. (2012). European budget: The poisonous budget rebate debate, studies and research N°41. Paris: Notre Europe.Google Scholar
  28. Lindner, J. (2006). Conflict and change in EU budgetary politics. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mattila, M. (2006). Fiscal transfers and redistribution in the European Union: Do smaller member states get more than their share? Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Monti M., Dăianu D., Fuest C., Georgieva K., Kalfin I., Lamassoure A., Moscovici P., Šimonytė I., Timmermans F., & Verhofstadt G. (2016) Future Financing of the EU—Final report and recommendations of the High Level Group on Own Resources. December.Google Scholar
  31. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: A study in public economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  33. Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of Fiscal Federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(August), 349–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Osterloh, S., Heinemann, F., & Mohl, P. (2009). EU budget reform options and the common pool problem. Public Finance and Management, 9(4), 644–685.Google Scholar
  36. Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. R. (1997). Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sachs, J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Fiscal Federalism and optimum currency areas: Evidence for Europe from the United States. In C. Matthew, G. Vittorio, & M. Paul (Eds.), Establishing a Central Bank: Issues in Europe and Lessons from the US. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Samuelson, P. A. (1955). Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tarschys, D. (2011). The EU budget: What should go in? What should go out?—SIEPS 2011:3. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  41. Von Hagen, J. (1992). Fiscal arrangements in a monetary union: Evidence from the US. In Fiscal Policy, Taxation and the Financial System in an Increasingly Integrated Europe (pp. 337–359). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Wyplosz, C. (2016). The six flaws of the Eurozone. Economic Policy, 31(87), 559–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial AffairsBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.European CommissionBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations