Economia Politica

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 579–599 | Cite as

International patenting decisions: empirical evidence with Spanish firms

  • Pilar BeneitoEmail author
  • María Engracia Rochina-Barrachina
  • Amparo Sanchis


This paper analyses the determinants of firms’ decisions to patent abroad. We use data spanning 2005–2013 of Spanish firms from PITEC, a panel database carried out by the INE (The National Statistics Institute). We focus on patenting firms and consider that firms’ decisions to apply for patents in foreign patent offices may be driven by two kinds of motivations: first, to exploit the patent in international markets where there is potential demand for the invention and, second, to protect the invention abroad when the quality of the invention is high enough. In the first case we refer to market-driven determinants and, in the second case, to innovation type-driven determinants. We empirically analyse these factors using information on firms’ sales in different geographic international markets, and also indicators of the quality and scope of the innovations. We distinguish among EPO, USPTO and PTC patents, and estimate, first, a multivariate probit model to determine the factors underlying the decision to apply for patents in these foreign offices. Second, we estimate a multivariate model to explain the shares of patent applications in each one of the offices.


International patenting Market-driven determinants Innovation type-driven determinants Firm-level data Multivariate models 

JEL Classification

D22 C30 O34 



We are grateful for the constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers and from the Journal invited editors. We also thank useful comments and suggestions received from participants at the XXXI Jornadas de Economía Industrial (Pamplona, Spain, 2017). This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad [ECO2014-55745-R and ECO2017-86793-R]; Fundación-BBVA, Programa de Ayudas a Proyectos de Investigación en Socioeconomía, 2014; and Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEOII/2014/054]. Usual disclaimer applies.


  1. Añón-Higón, D. (2016). In-house versus external basic research and first-to-market innovations. Research Policy, 45(4), 816–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beneito, P. (2006). The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models. Research Policy, 35(4), 502–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beneito, P., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., & Sanchis, A. (2014). Patents, competition, and firms’ innovation incentives. Industry and Innovation, 21(4), 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Motives to patent: empirical evidence from Germany. Research Policy, 35(5), 655–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloch, C., & Graversen, E. (2008). Innovativeness: An examination of innovative sales as a measure of innovation output. Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse, WP.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, H. P. (2010). The determinants of international patenting for nine agricultural biotechnology firms. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(2), 247–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cockburn, I. M., Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2016). Patents and the global diffusion of new drugs. The American Economic Review, 106(1), 136–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Czarnitzki, D., Kraft, K., & Thorwarth, S. (2009). The knowledge production of ‘R and D’. Economic Letters, 105, 141–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Rassenfosse, G., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. V. P. (2013). The role of fees in patent systems: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(4), 696–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dosi, G. K., Pavitt, K., & Soete, L. (1990). The economics of technical change and international trade. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (1996). Trade in ideas, patenting and productivity in the OECD. Journal of International Economics, 40(3), 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graevenitz, G., Wagner, S., & Harhoff, D. (2013). Incidence and growth of patent thickets: The impact of technological opportunities and complexity. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(3), 521–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, XXVIII, 1661–1707.Google Scholar
  14. Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. V. P. (2001). The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data. Research Policy, 30, 1253–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, B. H., & Harhoff, D. (2012). Recent research on the economics of patents. Working Paper 17773, NBER ( Accessed 23 Feb 2017.
  16. Hall, B. H., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2001). The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaffe, A. B., & Lerner, J. (2004). Innovations and its discontents: how our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial-research and development. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 3, 783–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Licht, G., & Zoz, K. (1998). Patents and R&D. An econometric investigation using applications for German, European and US patents by German companies. Annales d’Economie et Statistique, 49/50, 329–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maurseth, P. B., & Svensson, R. (2014). Micro evidence on international patenting. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(4), 398–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Noel, M., & Schankerman, M. (2013). Strategic patenting and software innovation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(3), 481–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sirilli, G. (1987). Patents and inventors: an empirical study. Research Policy, 16, 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang, C. H., & Kuo, N. F. (2008). Trade-related influences, foreign intellectual property rights and outbound international patenting. Research Policy, 37, 446–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Análisis EconómicoUniversity of Valencia and ERICESValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Estructura EconómicaUniversity of Valencia and ERICESValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations