The environmental Kuznets curve within European countries and sectors: greenhouse emission, production function and technology
- 2 Downloads
Based on the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis and the technological change and the environment literature, our original contribution consists in analysing within the decomposition model the direct and indirect influence of technological change as well as the energy mix on CO2 emissions. Focusing on the dirtiest sectors of 25 EU countries in the period 1997–2005 and considering the endogeneity issue, we estimate an adjusted EKC relationship comparing a single equation model (univariate model) with a simultaneous equations system (bivariate model). Following López (J Environ Econ Manag 27:163–184, 1994), a second equation is introduced where per capita income is a positive function of conventional factors as labour, capital, and technology. Our findings confirm that a negative relationship between income and CO2 emissions is dominant and seems that only the decreasing branch of the EKC is relevant. As regards the composition effect, emissions of the dirtiest sectors decrease when income increases. The impact of energy/input mix confirms that changing the energy mix may reduce emissions. The technique effects shows that the direct effect of R&D expenditure reduces pollution while the indirect effect is mixed: private R&D reinforces the reduction of emissions, the public spending on R&D instead increases emissions.
KeywordsAir pollution CO2 emissions Environmental Kuznets curve EU countries Scale effect Technique effect Composition effect Input/energy mix effect R&D expenditure
JEL numbersQ53 Q55 O33
We are grateful to the anonymous referees of this Journal for helpful suggestions and comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Usual disclaimers, however, apply.
- Blackwell, J. L. (2005). Estimation and testing of fixed-effect panel-data systems. The Stata Journal, 5(2), 202–207.Google Scholar
- Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis 4th edition (International ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Islam, N., Vincent, J., Panayotou, T., (1999). Unveiling the income–environment relationship: An exploration into the determinants of environmental quality, Working paper, Department of Economics and Harvard Institute for International Development.Google Scholar
- Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2003). Technological change and the environment. In K. -G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (Eds.), Handbook of environmental economics (vol. 1, pp. 461–516). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Lieb, C. M. (2003). The environmental Kuznets curve: A survey of the empirical evidence and of possible causes. University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, no. 391.Google Scholar
- Panayotou, T., (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development, Working paper WP238 technology and employment programme. Geneva: International Labor Office.Google Scholar
- Panayotou, T., (2000). Economic growth and the environment, Center for International Development (CID) at Harvard University Working paper No. 56 and environment and development paper No. 4.Google Scholar
- Shafik, N., Bandyopadhyay, S., (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: Time series and cross-country evidence, Background paper for the world development report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar