Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The ECB: a reluctant leading character of the EMU play

  • Published:
Economia Politica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper assesses the performance of the European Central Bank (ECB) during the crisis that started in 2008. The ECB statute is consistent with a view of the economy that was predominant in the 1990s, that postulates a very limited role for discretional policies in managing the business cycle. The ECB had therefore to stretch its mandate in several occasions, during the crisis, to avoid severe outcomes. It was unable to avoid a slow but inexorable slide of the Eurozone towards deflation and a liquidity trap. To restore robust growth, fiscal policy should be used, and institutions should be redesigned away from the Berlin–Washington Consensus framework that shaped the Maastricht Treaty. Better rules for fiscal governance and a wider ECB mandate are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Wolfgang Munchau (2014) argued recently that the length of the crisis, and the incapacity of European policy makers to endow the Eurozone with a well-functioning governance endanger the single currency more today than at the height of the crisis.

  2. The five criteria, aimed at guaranteeing nominal convergence before the adoption of the single currency, where: (1) inflation close to the average between the lowest inflation rates in the zone; (2) long term interest rates close to the average between the lowest interest rates in the zone; (3) 2 years at least in the exchange rate mechanism, without realignments; (4) public deficit lower than 3 % of GDP; (5) public debt lower than 60 % of GDP, or approaching to that level at a sufficiently fast pace. By the decision date of June 1998, 11 countries fulfilled the criteria, with Greece joining shortly afterwards. As of January 2015, the Eurozone has 19 members.

  3. The fiscal impulse is computed as the negative of year on year changes in cyclically adjusted government net lending. It measures the discretionary fiscal stance of the country, a positive number denoting an expansionary period.

  4. The Eurozone banking union, that is taking shape as we write, was meant to provide a supranational backstop for financial institutions, and a common supervisory board. The banking union being implemented falls short especially on the first account (for details see Ubide 2013).

  5. Mario Draghi in fact forcefully denied that the ECB was stepping out of its mandate, arguing that a collapse of the euro, and the ensuing turmoil in financial markets, would have undermined the very price stability that the ECB is meant to pursue.

  6. To carry on the policy changes he had in mind, Mario Draghi had to twist some arms in the ECB Governing Council. This resulted in unprecedented tensions (see Reuters 2014). In the meantime, on the OMT program is pending a judgment of constitutionality at the European Court of Justice (ECJ), which has been solicited by the German Constitutional Court. The ECJ comforted Mario Draghi, declaring the OMT legal "in principle".

  7. An asset-backed security (ABS) is a corporate security (usually issued by a financial institution) whose value is derived from and collateralized (or "backed") by a specified pool of underlying assets, that typically are too illiquid to be sold separately.

  8. For more information see the references in Creel et al. (2009) and, for a critical view, Balassone and Franco (2000).

References

  • Adrian, T., & Shin, H. S. (2010). Liquidity and leverage. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19(3), 418–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassone, F., & Franco, D. (2000). Public investment, the stability pact and the “Golden Rule”. Fiscal Studies, 21(2), 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (2001). Should central banks respond to movements in asset prices? American Economic Review, 91(2), 253–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. J., Dell’Ariccia, G., & Mauro, P. (2010). Rethinking macroeconomic policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42(S1), 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blot, C., Creel, J., Hubert, P., & Labondance, F. (2014). Dealing with the ECB’s triple mandate? Revue de l’OFCE—Debates and Policies, 134, 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blot, C., Creel, J., Hubert, P., Labondance, F., & Saraceno, F. (2015). Assessing the link between price and financial stability. Journal of Financial Stability, Documents de Travail de l’OFCE, 16, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borio, C., & Lowe, P. (2002). Asset prices, financial and monetary stability: Exploring the nexus. BIS Working Papers 114 (July).

  • Chowdhury, A., & Islam, I. (2014). Growth and jobs in Europe: which way now? VoxEU (November 24).

  • Constâncio, V. (2014). The role of the banking union in achieving financial stability. Speech at the FT Banking Summit ‘Ensuring Future Growth’ (November 26).

  • Creel, J., Monperrus-Veroni, P., & Saraceno, F. (2009). On the long-term effects of fiscal policy in the United Kingdom: the case for a golden rule. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 56(5), 580–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creel, J., & Saraceno, F. (2010). The crisis, automatic stabilisation, and the stability pact. Revista de Economia Y Estadistica XLVIII, 1, 75–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A. (2013). Monetary policy and institutions before, during, and after the global financial crisis. Journal of Financial Stability, 9(3), 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. (2014). Fault lines within the ECB. Financial Times (November 26).

  • Derviş, K., & Saraceno, F. (2014). An investment new deal for Europe. Brookings BlogsUp Front (September 3).

  • DIW (2013). Investment for more growth—an agenda for Germany’s future. DIW Economic Bulletin 8 (August).

  • Draghi, M. (2012). Speech at the global investment conference in London. ECB (July 26).

  • Draghi, M. (2014a). Unemployment in the euro area. Speech at the Annual Central Bank Symposium in Jackson Hole (August 22).

  • Draghi, M. (2014b). Introductory remarks at the EP’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee. ECB (September 22).

  • Draghi, M. (2014c). Stability and prosperity in Monetary Union. Speech at the University of Helsinki (November 27).

  • European Commission (2014). An investment plan for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committe of Regions, the European Investment Bank (November 26).

  • Evans, C. (2011). The Fed’s dual mandate responsibilities and challenges facing U.S. Monetary Policy. A Speech Delivered at the European Economics and Financial Centre in London, United Kingdom. (September 7).

  • Fitoussi, J.-P., & Saraceno, F. (2008). Fiscal discipline as a social norm: The European stability pact. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10(6), 1143–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitoussi, J.-P., & Saraceno, F. (2011). Inequality, the crisis and after. Rivista Di Politica Economica, 1, 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitoussi, J.-P., & Saraceno, F. (2013). European economic governance: The Berlin–Washington consensus. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(3), 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, C. (2000). The rise and fall of the Washington consensus as a paradigm for developing countries. World Development, 28, 789–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEO (2014). IMF Response to the Financial and Economic Crisis: An IEO Assessment.

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. London: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2014). Apologizing to Japan. The New York Times (October 31).

  • Lane, P. (2000). Asymmetric and monetary shocks policy in a currency union. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(4), 585–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Moigne, M., Saraceno, F., & Villemot, S. (2016). Probably too little, certainly too late. An Assessement of the Juncker Investment Plan. Document de Travail de l’OFCE (10).

  • Leijonhufvud, A. (2007). Monetary and financial stability. CEPR Policy Insight 14 (October).

  • Munchau, W. (2014). The Euro is in greater peril today than at the height of the crisis. The Financial Times (November 8).

  • Mundell, R. A. (1961). A theory of optimum currency areas. The American Economic Review, 51(4), 657–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasimeni, P. (2016). Instability and stagnation in a Monetary Union. Inet BLog (April 11).

  • Quadrio Curzio, A. (2016). Eurobonds for EMU stability and structural growth. In I. Cardinale & D. Coffman (Eds.), The political economy of the Eurozone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters (2014). ‘Mario Draghi’s German Problem’, October 23.

  • Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? Journal of Economic Literature, 44, 973–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, F. (2012). Quantitative easing and lender of last resort: Lots of confusion under the sky. Sparse Thoughts of a Gloomy European Economist (September 17).

  • Saraceno, F. (2013a). Would a United States of Europe finally solve the Euro Zone crisis? Strategic Review, 3(4), 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, F. (2013b). Short-term pain for long-term… pain. Sparse Thoughts of a Gloomy European Economist (September 5).

  • Saraceno, F. (2015). Challenges for the ECB in Times of Deflation. ILO Employment Working Papers 183 (June).

  • Saraceno, F. & Tamborini, R. (2015). How can it work? On the impact of quantitative easing in the Eurozone. DEM Discussion Papers. University of Trento 3.

  • Schäuble, W. (2013). Ignore the doomsayers: Europe Is being fixed. The Financial Times (September 16).

  • Schwartz, A. J. (1995). Why financial stability depends on price stability. Economic Affairs, 15(4), 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (2014). Austerity, growth and inflation: remarks on the Eurozone’s unresolved competitiveness problem. The World Economy, 37(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truger, A. (2015). Implementing the golden rule for public investment in Europe safeguarding public investment and supporting the recovery. Materialien Zu Wirtschaft Und Gesellschaft (138).

  • Ubide, A. (2013). How to form a more perfect European Banking Union. Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief PB13-23 (October).

  • Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American adjustment: How much has happened?. Washington: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy Macroeconomic Dynamics (Vol. 9). Princeton University Press.

  • Woodford, M. (2012). Inflation targeting and financial stability. NBER Working Papers 17967 (April).

  • Wyplosz, C. (2012). The ECB’s Trillion Euro Bet. VoxEU 02-12, http://voxeu.org/article/ecb-s-trillion-euro-bet.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Saraceno.

Additional information

This paper builds on a presentation at the July 2014 ILO workshop on “The Role of Central Banks in Meeting Development and Employment Challenges”, and on a subsequent paper (Saraceno 2015). Financial support from the ILO is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saraceno, F. The ECB: a reluctant leading character of the EMU play. Econ Polit 33, 129–151 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-016-0032-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-016-0032-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation