Skip to main content

Prognostic Factors Contributing to the Survival of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the General Population with Leukemia: a Systematic Review

Abstract

Purpose

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers new hope for improving the outcome of leukemic patients who have failed chemotherapy or irradiation therapy. To our knowledge, there was no comprehensive systematic review discussing the prognostic factors for a successful HSCT. We conducted a systematic review to summarize all survival prognostic factors in leukemic patients receiving HSCT as a reference for personalized cancer therapy.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and ScienceDirect databases. The bias and qualities of the studies were assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) after assessing the duplicated publication, studies inclusion, and exclusion. The protocol used in this study was registered in PROSPERO.

Results

Six cohort studies from 3 continents (America, Europe, and Asia) were selected. The survival outcome parameters included in our review were overall survival (OS), graft versus host disease (GVHD) relapse-free survival (GRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), progression-free survival (PFS), and relapse incidence (RI). Our analysis found that 12 prognostic factors contributed to HSCT survival were age, gender, donor type, human leucocyte antigens (HLA) matching status, disease type, disease risk, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus, Kanofsky/Lansky score, patient comorbidity, HSC source (peripheral blood vs bone marrow), immune marker, and GVHD prophylaxis. HSC source was the only factor among all prognostic factors that contribute to varied HSCT outcomes. HSCT with bone marrow–derived hematopoietic stem cells (BM-HSCs) resulted in superior outcomes than those from peripheral blood (PB)-derived HSCs, in terms of OS, GVHD, and GRFS.

Conclusion

12 prognostic factors significantly contributed to HSCT survival in patients with leukemia. The different HSC sources resulted in conflicting outcomes among the selected studies, thus opening up an opportunity for future studies with a larger number of patients. By anticipating these factors, physicians can reduce unwanted outcomes and increase patients’ quality of life through HSCT.

Lay Summary

This paper summarizes all survival prognostic factors in leukemic patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as a reference for personalized cancer therapy. Based on the data from 4 retrospective and 2 prospective cohort studies across 3 continents (America, Europe, and Asia), it was found that 12 prognostic factors contributed to the survival rates after HSCT were recipient/donor age, gender, donor type, HLA-matching status, disease type, disease risk, comorbidity, cytomegalovirus serostatus, Kanofsky/Lansky score, immune markers, HSC source, and graft versus host disease prevention. Disease risk and source of HSC were the most discussed significant factors (3 studies), followed by age, gender, type of leukemia, comorbidities, and Karnofsky score (2 studies). Almost all of the prognostic factors discussed above have been confirmed to have similar outcomes by multiple studies. However, the difference in HSC sources still has conflicting results between studies, suggesting the necessity of future studies with a larger number of patients. By anticipating these factors, physicians can reduce unwanted outcomes and increase patients’ quality of life through HSCT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Lyengar V, Shimanovsky A. Leukemia. [Updated 2021 Jul 21]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560490/

  2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, Bloomfield CD, Cazzola M, Vardiman JW. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391–405. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu B, Ezeogu L, Zellmer L, Yu B, Xu N, Joshua LD. Protecting the normal in order to better kill the cancer. Cancer Med. 2015;4(9):1394–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khaddour K, Hana CK, Mewawalla P. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. [Updated 2021 Jul 25]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536951/

  7. Lee JY, Hong SH. Hematopoietic stem cells and their roles in tissue regeneration. Int J Stem Cells. 2020;13(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.15283/ijsc19127.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haschek WM, Rousseaux CG, Wallig MA. Fundamentrals of toxicology pathology. 2nd ed. USA: Academic Press; 2010. p. 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-370469-6.00016-7.

  9. Barnes DW, Corp MJ, Loutit JF, Neal FE. Treatment of murine leukaemia with X rays and homologous bone marrow; preliminary communication. Br Med J. 1956;2(4993):626–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.4993.626.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas ED, Lochte HL, Lu WC, Ferrebee JW. Intravenous infusion of bone marrow in patients receiving radiation and chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 1957;257(11):491–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM195709122571102.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Styczyński J, Tridello G, Koster L, et al. Death after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: changes over calendar year time, infections and associated factors. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019;55:126–136Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0624-z

  12. Bouard L, et al. Influence of donor type (sibling versus matched unrelated donor versus haploidentical donor) on outcomes after Clofarabine-based reduced-intensity conditioning allograft for myeloid malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25:p1465–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fan Q, et al. Superior GVHD-free, relapse-free survival for G-BM to G-PBSC grafts is associated with higher MDSCs content in allografting for patients with acute leukemia. J Hematol. 2017;10: p135.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mangantig E, Naing NN, Norsa’adah B, Azlan H. Survival and prognostic factors in Malaysian acute myeloid leukemia patients after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol. 2013;98:197–205

  15. Shima T, et al. Quantitation of hematogones at the time of engraftment is a useful prognostic indicator in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2013;121(5):p840–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shouval R, et al. The Simplified Comorbidity Index (SCI) — a new tool for prediction of non-relapse mortality in allogeneic HCT. Blood adv. 2021 Sep 10;bloodadvances.2021004319.  https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004319.

  17. Shaw BE, et al. Unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplants incorporating pre-transplant in-vivo Alemtuzumab are not associated with any increased risk of significant acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease. Br J. 2011;153:p244–52.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmed AS, Sheng MH, Wasnik S, Baylink DJ, Lau KW. Effect of aging on stem cells. World J Exp Med. 2017;7(1):1–10. Published 2017 Feb 20. https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v7.i1.1

  19. Chen J, Kao YR, Sun D, et al. Myelodysplastic syndrome progression to acute myeloid leukemia at the stem cell level [published correction appears in Nat Med. 2018 Dec 19;:]. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):103–110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0267-4

  20. Serody JS, Sparks SD, Lin Y, Capel EJ, Bigelow SH, Kirby SL, Gabriel DA, Wiley JM, Brecher ME, Schell MJ, et al. Comparison of granulocyte colonystimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells and G-CSF-stimulated bone marrow as a source of stem cells in HLA-matched sibling transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2000;6(4A):434–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morton J, Hutchins C, Durrant S. Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)primed allogeneic bone marrow: significantly less graft-versus-host disease and comparable engraftment to G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells. Blood. 2001;98(12):3186–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Highfill SL, Rodriguez PC, Zhou Q, Goetz CA, Koehn BH, Veenstra R, Taylor PA, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Serody JS, Munn DH, et al. Bone marrow myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) inhibit graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) via an arginase-1-dependent mechanism that is up-regulated by interleukin-13. Blood. 2010;116(25):5738–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma P, Purev E, Haverkos B, et al. Adult cord blood transplant results in comparable overall survival and improved GRFS vs matched related transplant. Blood Adv. 2020;4(10):2227–35. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brunstein CG, Gutman JA, Weisdorf DJ, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancy: relative risks and benefits of double umbilical cord blood. Blood. 2010;116(22):4693–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Komanduri KV, St John LS, de Lima M, et al. Delayed immune reconstitution after cord blood transplantation is characterized by impaired thymopoiesis and late memory T-cell skewing. Blood. 2007;110(13):4543–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kanda J, Chiou LW, Szabolcs P, et al. Immune recovery in adult patients after myeloablative dual umbilical cord blood, matched sibling, and matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(11):1664–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bejanyan N, Brunstein CG, Cao Q, et al. Delayed immune reconstitution after allogeneic transplantation increases the risks of mortality and chronic GVHD. Blood Adv. 2018;2(8):909–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar AJ, Kim S, Hemmer MT, et al. Graft-versus-host disease in recipients of male unrelated donor compared with parous female sibling donor transplants [published correction appears in Blood Adv. 2018 Jun 12;2(11):1294]. Blood Adv. 2018;2(9):1022–1031. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2017013052

  29. Toubai T, Tawara I, Sun Y, et al. Induction of acute GVHD by sex-mismatched H-Y antigens in the absence of functional radiosensitive host hematopoietic-derived antigen-presenting cells. Blood. 2012;119(16):3844–53. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-10-384057.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gratwohl A, Ruiz de Elvira C, Gratwohl M, Greinix HT, Duarte R. Gender and graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 June; 22(6):P1145–1146.

  31. Cornelissen JJ, van Putten WL, Verdonck LF, Theobald M, Jacky E, Daenen SM, et al. Results of a HOVON/SAKK donor versus no-donor analysis of myeloablative HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation in first remission acute myeloid leukemia in young and middle-aged adults: benefits for whom? Blood. 2007;109(9):3658–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brissot E, Labopin M, Stelljes M, et al. Comparison of matched sibling donors versus unrelated donors in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;130(10). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0498-8

  33. Saber W, Opie S, Rizzo JD, Zhang MJ, Horowitz MM, Schriber J. Outcomes after matched unrelated donor versus identical sibling hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2012;119(17):3908–16. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-09-381699.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nowak J. Role of HLA in hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;42:S71–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2008.288.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fuji S, Kanda J, Kato S, Ikegame K, Morishima S, Miyamoto T, et al. Impact of HLA allele mismatch on the clinical outcome in serologically matched related hematopoietic SCT. Bone marrow transplantation. 2014; 49. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2014.141.

  36. Timmerman C. Just give me the best quality of life questionnaire’: the Karnofsky scale and the history of quality of life measurements in cancer trials. Chronic Illn. 2012 Septermber; 9(3): p179–190

  37. Obiozor C, Subramaniam D, Divine C, Shune L, Singh A, Lin T, et al. Evaluation of performance status and hematopoietic cell transplantation specific co-morbidity index on unplanned admission rates in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing outpatient autologous stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017; 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.06.001.

  38. Vendramin A, Gimondi S, Bermema A, Longoni P, Rizzitano S, Corradini P, Carniti C. Graft monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell content predicts the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic transplantation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20(12):2049–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(3):162–74. 39

  40. Zea AH, Rodriguez PC, Atkins MB, Hernandez C, Signoretti S, Zabaleta J, McDermott D, Quiceno D, Youmans A, O’Neill A, et al. Arginase-producing myeloid suppressor cells in renal cell carcinoma patients: a mechanism of tumor evasion. Cancer Res. 2005;65(8):3044–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Filipazzi P, Valenti R, Huber V, Pilla L, Canese P, Iero M, Castelli C, Mariani L, Parmiani G, Rivoltini L. Identification of a new subset of myeloid suppressor cells in peripheral blood of melanoma patients with modulation by a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulation factor-based antitumor vaccine. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18):2546–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hoechst B, Ormandy LA, Ballmaier M, Lehner F, Kruger C, Manns MP, Greten TF, Korangy F. A new population of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma patients induces CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T cells. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(1):234–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sevilla DW, ColovaiAI, Emmons FN, Bhagat G, Alobeid B. Hematogones: a review and update. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51(1):10–19.

  44. LeBienTW. Fates of human B-cell precursors. Blood. 2000;96(1):9–23.

  45. HonebrinkT, Dayton V, Burke MJ, et al. Impact of bone marrow hematogones on umbilical cord blood transplantation outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(6):930–936.

  46. Chantepie SP, Salaun V, Parienti JJ, et al. Hematogones: a new prognostic factor for acute myeloblastic leukemia. Blood. 2011;117(4):1315–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gooptu M, Antin JH. GVHD prophylaxis 2020. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 605726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.605726.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Michonneau D, Socié G. GVHD Prophylaxis (Immunosuppression) In: Carreras E, Dufour C, Mohty M, et al., editors. The EBMT handbook: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and cellular therapies [Internet]. 7th edition. Cham (CH): Springer; 2019. Chapter 25. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554020https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02278-5_25

  49. Storb R, Deeg HJ, Whitehead J, Appelbaum F, Beatty P, Bensinger W, et al. Methotrexate and cyclosporine compared with cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of acute graft versus host disease after marrow transplantation for leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:729–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Undergraduate Medical Program of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia and funded by Program Flagship Prioritas Riset Nasional (PRN) Untuk Perguruan Tinggi Tahun Anggaran 2021 from Indonesian Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology awarded to Dr. Retno Wahyu Nurhayati of Universitas Indonesia (Nomor: PKS-193/UN2.INV/HKP.05/2021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KT and SLR conducted the literature search, data analysis, and manuscript writing. MR performed data analysis and interpretation. RWN wrote the manuscript and managed the research grant. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Retno Wahyu Nurhayati.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 254 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tayuwijaya, K., Raharja, S.L., Rosana, M. et al. Prognostic Factors Contributing to the Survival of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the General Population with Leukemia: a Systematic Review. Regen. Eng. Transl. Med. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40883-022-00269-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40883-022-00269-8

Keywords

  • Hematopoietic stem cell
  • Leukemia
  • Prognostic factors
  • Survival outcome
  • Transplantation