Households are frequently subject to income and asset shocks. We performed a lab experiment, inducing losses on a real effort task, after which we measured cognitive performance, loss aversion and cheating behavior. We found that asset losses, but not income losses, act as a cognitive load, by decreasing accuracy and increasing response times. We did not detect any change in dishonesty or loss aversion.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aksoy, B., & Palma, M. A. (2019). The effects of scarcity on cheating and in-group favoritism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 165, 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.06.024.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1.
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.
Bicchieri, C. (2017). Norms in the wild. In Norms in the wild: How to diagnose, measure, and change social norms. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190622046.001.0001.
Bogliacino, F., Grimalda, G., Ortoleva, P., & Ring, P. (2017). Exposure to and recall of violence reduce short-term memory and cognitive control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(32), 8505–8510. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704651114.
Bogliacino, F., Jiménez Lozano, L., & Reyes, D. (2018). Socioeconomic stratification and stereotyping: lab-in-the-field evidence from Colombia. International Review of Economics, 65(1), 77–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-017-0285-4.
Carvalho, L. S., Meier, S., & Wang, S. W. (2016). Poverty and economic decision-making: evidence from changes in financial resources at payday. The American Economic Review, 106(2), 260–284. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20140481.
Chen, D. L., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C. (2016). oTree-an open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2015.12.001.
Dai, Z., Galeotti, F., & Villeval, M. C. (2018). Cheating in the lab predicts fraud in the field: An experiment in public transportation. Management Science, 64(3), 1081–1100.
Dean, M., & Ortoleva, P. (2019). The empirical relationship between nonstandard economic behaviors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(33), 16262–16267. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821353116.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.
Dinno A. 2017. tostregress: Linear regression tests for equivalence. Stata software package. https://www.alexisdinno.com/stata/tost.html.
Ehrlich, I. (1973). Participation in illegitimate activities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 521–565. https://doi.org/10.1086/260058.
Engle, R. W., Laughlin, J. E., Tuholski, S. W., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34188.8.131.529.
Fischbacher, U., & Föllmi-Heusi, F. (2013). Lies in disguise. An experimental study on cheating. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12014.
Fox, C. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2009) Prospect theory and the brain. In Neuroeconomics (pp. 145–173). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374176-9.00011-7.
Gächter, S., Johnson, E. J., & Herrmann, A. (2010). Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. CeDEx Discussion Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-011-1262-2.
Haushofer, J., & Fehr, E. (2014). On the psychology of poverty. Science, 344, 862–867. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232491.
Haushofer, J., Schunk, D., & Fehr, E. (2013). Negative income shocks increase discount rates. University of Zurich Working Paper.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow (Anchor Can). Doubleday Canada.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
Kremer, M., Rao, G., & Schilbach, F. (2019). Behavioral Development Economics. In D. Barnheim, S. Della Vigna, & D. Laibson (Eds.), Handbook of Behavioral Economics. Foundations and Applications II Elsevier: North Holland.
Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362.
Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science, 341(6149), 976–980. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238041.
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067.
Pammi, V. S. C., Ruiz, S., Lee, S., Noussair, C. N., & Sitaram, R. (2017). The effect of wealth shocks on loss aversion: Behavior and neural correlates. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00237.
Rabin, M. (2000). Risk aversion and expected utility: A calibration theorem. Econometrica, 68(5), 1281–1292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00158.
We acknowledge financial support from Internal Grant Convocatoria Jesus Antonio Bejarano 2017. We thank the Managing Editor, Maria Bigoni, Dirk Engelmann and two anonymous referees for their careful reading and suggestions. We thank Alexis Dinno for clarifications on the routine for equivalence tests. We appreciate comments from all participants at the BEBES seminar in Bogotá, the Bogotá Experimental Economics Conference 2019 and the ESA World Congress 2019. We thank Silvia López, César Mantilla, Lina Moros who commented on Felipe’s Master thesis which was part of this work. We are also thankful to Marco Palma, Patrick Ring, Gianluca Grimalda, Camilo Gómez, and Nicolás Rodriguez for their comments and suggestions. Thanks also to Natalí Barrera and Laura Jiménez who helped with the experiments.
This article was funded by Universidad Nacional de Colombia (Grant No. JAB 2017-38783).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Bogliacino, F., Montealegre, F. Do negative economic shocks affect cognitive function, adherence to social norms and loss aversion?. J Econ Sci Assoc 6, 57–67 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-020-00091-4
- Cognitive function
- Social norm
- Loss aversion
- Negative shock