Skip to main content
Log in

Modification of Jet Velocities in an Explosively Loaded Copper Target with a Conical Cavity

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, the design and execution of an experiment with the goal of demonstrating control over the evolution of a copper jet is described. Simulations show that when using simple multi-material buffers placed between a copper target with a conical cavity and a cylinder of high-explosive, a variety of jetting behaviors occur based on material placement, including both jet velocity augmentation and mitigation. A parameter sweep was performed to determine optimal buffer designs in two configurations. Experiments using the optimal buffer designs verified the effectiveness of the buffers at altering jet velocities. Similar trends were shown between the experimental results and the modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Experimental data can be made available upon reasonable requests.

References

  1. Richtmyer RD (1960) Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids. Commun Pure Appl Math XIII:297–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Meshkov EE (1969) Instability of the interface of two gasses accelerated by a shock wave. Mekhanika Zhidkosti i Gaza 4:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brouillette M (2002) The Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 34:445–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou Y (2017) Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. I. Phys Rep 720–722:1–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.07.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Y (2017) Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. II. Phys Rep 723:1–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.07.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou Y et al (2021) Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities: a journey through scales. Physica D Nonlinear Phenom 423:132838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2020.132838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sterbentz DM et al (2022) Design optimization for Richtmyer–Meshkov instability suppression at shock-compressed material interfaces. Phys Fluids 34:082109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jekel CF et al (2022) Using conservation laws to infer deep learning model accuracy of Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.11477

  9. Sterbentz DM, Jekel CF, White DA, Rieben RN, Belof JL (2023) Linear shaped-charge jet optimization using machine learning methods. J Appl Phys 134:045102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0156373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hennessey M, Springer H, Belof J (2023) Modification of Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities via layered explosive charge design. J Appl Phys 10(1063/5):0165094

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kline DJ et al (2024) Reducing Richtmyer–Meshkov instability jet velocity via inverse design. J Appl Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0180712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schill W et al (2024) Suppression of Richtmyer–Meshkov instability via special pairs of shocks and phase transitions. Phys Rev Lett 132:024001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.024001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sterbentz DM, Kline DJ, White DA, Jekel CF, Hennessey MP, Amondson DK, Wilson AJ, Sevcik MJ, Villena MFL, Lin SS, Grapes MD, Sullivan KT, Belof JL (2024) Explosively driven Richtmyer–Meshkov instability jet suppression and enhancement via coupling machine learning and additive manufacturing. J Appl Phys 136:035102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0213123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Noble CR et al (2017) ALE3D: an arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian multi-physics code. Technical Report LLNL-TR-732040. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  15. Lorenz KT, Lee EL, Chambers R (2015) A simple and rapid evaluation of explosive performance—the disc acceleration experiment. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 40:95–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.201400081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Department of the Army Technical Manual - Military Explosives (1990). Tech. Rep. TM 9-1300-214. US Department of the Army, Washington

  17. Production, distribution, and storage of C-4 explosive (1990). Tech. Rep. Report number B-238708. United States General Accounting Office

  18. Ahmed K, Malik AQ (2022) Experimental investigations of the response of a portable container to blast, fragmentation, and thermal effects of energetic materials detonation. Int J Prot Struct 13:45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuhl A (2010) Thermodynamic states in explosion fields. Tech. Rep. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore

  20. Sevcik MJ et al (2023) Extrusion parameter control optimization for DIW 3D printing using image analysis techniques. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-023-00470-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hennessey MP et al (2023) Modification of Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities via layered explosive charge design. J Appl Phys 134:245901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0165094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bastea S, Fried LE (2012) Chemical equilibrium detonation. In: Shockwave science and technology reference library, vol 6, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin

  23. Coe JD (2015) Sesame equations of state for stress cushion and related materials. Tech. Rep., Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore. https://doi.org/10.2172/1171675

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. We gratefully acknowledge the LLNL Lab Directed Research and Development Program for funding support of this research under Project No. 21-SI-006. Document release number LLNL-JRNL-860841.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Michael P. Hennessey: Conceptualization, methodology, software validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, datacuration, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision. Finnegan Wilson: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization. Grace I. Rabinowitz: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization. Max J. Sevcik: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, resources writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization. Kadyn J. Tucker: Methodology, validation, investigation, resources writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. Dylan J. Kline: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration. David K. Amondson: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, visualization, supervision, project administration. H. Keo Springer: Conceptualization, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, visualization, supervision, project administration. Kyle T. Sullivan: Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, investigation, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. Veronica Eliasson: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. Jonathan L. Belof: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Eliasson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

F. Wilson and K. J. Tucker are members of SEM.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hennessey, M.P., Wilson, F., Rabinowitz, G.I. et al. Modification of Jet Velocities in an Explosively Loaded Copper Target with a Conical Cavity. J. dynamic behavior mater. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-024-00447-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-024-00447-5

Keywords

Navigation