Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Ballistic Performance of Ultra High Hard Armour Steel Joints Welded Using Shielded Metal Arc Welding Process and Austenitic Stainless Steel Electrode

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study involves experimental and numerical investigation on ballistic performance of ultra-high hard armour (UHHA) steel joints fabricated using shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) process and austenitic stainless steel (ASS) electrodes. The ballistic test of UHHA-steel butt joints involves subjecting welded joints to 7.62 mm armor-piercing (AP) small arm projectiles. The weld metal (WM) and the weld interface (WI) are the areas of interest for the impact in ballistic test. The simulation approach of finite element analysis (FEA) that incorporates the model of Johnson–Cook and Mie Gruneisen equation of state (EOS) for the equations of velocity—Shock Rankine-Hugoniot. The scanning electron microscopy was employed to analyze the microstructure and ballistically tested regions of UHHA-steel butt joints. The hardness of the different regions of UHHA-steel joint was estimated using Vickers microhardness test. The results disclosed that the AP projectiles were arrested at the WM and WI, each exhibiting distinct depth of penetration (DoP) and width of penetration (WoP). These results align well with the FE model predictions. During projectile impact, a ductile hole growth was observed as plastic deformation pushes the material outward. When an AP projectile strikes, striations appear on the target plate's surface, observed both experimentally and in FE simulations. Additionally, the AP projectile becomes lodged at the WM. At the interface, the WM absorbs the projectile's movement, while the harder heat-affected zone (HAZ) disrupts the trajectory due to the soft/hard (austenite/martensite) interface. This behavior is elucidated by examining the WoP in impact region within the FE model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Abbreviations

RHA steel:

Rolled homogeneous armour steel

UHHA steel:

Ultra-high hard armour steel

HIC:

Hydrogen induced cracking

SMAW:

Shielded metal arc welding

ASS:

Austenitic stainless steel

AP projectile:

Armour piercing projectile

FEA:

Finite element analysis

WM:

Weld metal

HAZ:

Heat affected zone

BM:

Base metal

WI:

Weld interface

SLR:

Self-loading type of rifle

IT:

Impact toughness

EOS:

Equation of state

DoP:

Depth of penetration

WoP:

Width of penetration

References

  1. Saleh M, Luzin V, Kariem MA, Thorogood K, Ruan D (2020) Experimental measurements of residual stress in ARMOX 500T and evaluation of the resultant ballistic performance. J Dyn Behav Mater 6:78–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nathan SR, Balasubramanian V, Rao AG, Sonar T, Ivanov M, Suganeswaran K (2023) Effect of tool rotational speed on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded DMR249A high strength low alloy steel butt joints for fabrication of light weight ship building structures. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf 6(4):469–482

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nathan SR, Balasubramanian V, Gourav Rao A, Sonar T, Ivanov M, Rajendran C (2023) Influence of tool plunging rate on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded DMR249A high strength low alloy (HSLA) steel butt joints. Mater Test 65(10):1528–1538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Naveen Kumar S, Balasubramanian V, Malarvizhi S, Hafeezur Rahman A, Balaguru V (2021) Influence of microstructural characteristics on ballistic performance and its mode of failure in shielded metal arc welded ultra-high hard armor steel joints. Trans Indian Inst Met 74:909–921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Naveen Kumar S, Visvalingam B, Sudersanan M, Abdur HR, Vadivel B (2021) Influence of welding consumables on ballistic performance of gas metal arc welded ultra-high hard armor steel joints. Mater Perform Charact 10(1):443–462

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar KS, Arivazhagan N (2024) An innovative pulsed current arc welding technology for armor steel: processes, microstructure, and mechanical properties. Mater Today Commun 38:108237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Magudeeswaran G, Balasubramanian V, Reddy GM (2008) Hydrogen induced cold cracking studies on armour grade high strength, quenched and tempered steel weldments. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33(7):1897–1908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Naveen Kumar S, Balasubramanian V, Malarvizhi S, Hafeezur Rahman A, Balaguru V (2022) Effect of welding consumables on the ballistic performance of shielded metal arc welded dissimilar armor steel joints. J Mater Eng Perform 31:162–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Balaguru V, Balasubramanian V, Sivakumar P (2020) Effect of weld metal composition on impact toughness properties of shielded metal arc welded ultra-high hard armor steel joints. J Mech Behav Mater 29(1):186–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karagöz Ş, Atapek ŞH, Yilmaz A (2010) Microstructural and fractographical studies on quenched and tempered armor steels. Mater Test 52(5):316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jena PK, Mishra B, RameshBabu M, Babu A, Singh AK, SivaKumar K, Bhat TB (2010) Effect of heat treatment on mechanical and ballistic properties of a high strength armour steel. Int J Impact Eng 37(3):242–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maweja K, Stumpf W (2008) The design of advanced performance high strength low-carbon martensitic armour steels: microstructural considerations. Mater Sci Eng, A 480(1–2):160–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jena PK, Kumar KS, Krishna VR, Singh AK, Bhat TB (2008) Studies on the role of microstructure on performance of a high strength armour steel. Eng Fail Anal 15(8):1088–1096

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Magudeeswaran G, Balasubramanian V, Balasubramanian TS, Reddy GM (2008) Effect of welding consumables on tensile and impact properties of shielded metal arc welded high strength, quenched and tempered steel joints. Sci Technol Weld Join 13(2):97–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Børvik T, Dey S, Clausen AH (2009) Perforation resistance of five different high-strength steel plates subjected to small-arms projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 36(7):948–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Børvik T, Langseth M, Hopperstad OS, Malo KA (2002) Perforation of 12 mm thick steel plates by 20 mm diameter projectiles with flat, hemispherical and conical noses: Part I: experimental study. Int J Impact Eng 27(1):19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Børvik T, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M, Malo KA (2003) Effect of target thickness in blunt projectile penetration of Weldox 460 E steel plates. Int J Impact Eng 28(4):413–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dey SA, Børvik T, Hopperstad OS, Leinum JR, Langseth M (2004) The effect of target strength on the perforation of steel plates using three different projectile nose shapes. Int J Impact Eng 30(8–9):1005–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammad Z, Gupta PK, Baqi A, Iqbal MA (2021) Ballistic performance of monolithic and double layered thin-metallic hemispherical shells at normal and oblique impact. Thin-Walled Struct 159:107257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Flores-Johnson EA, Saleh M, Edwards L (2011) Ballistic performance of multi-layered metallic plates impacted by a 7.62-mm APM2 projectile. Int J Impact Eng 38(12):1022–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Flores-Johnson EA, Muránsky O, Hamelin CJ, Bendeich PJ, Edwards L (2012) Numerical analysis of the effect of weld-induced residual stress and plastic damage on the ballistic performance of welded steel plate. Comput Mater Sci 58:131–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. NATO STANAG 4569 (2004) Protection levels for occupants of logistic and light armoured vehicles. ed 1

  23. Jena PK, Ramanjeneyulu K, Kumar KS, Bhat TB (2009) Ballistic studies on layered structures. Mater Des 30(6):1922–1929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fei Z, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H, Wu B, Ding D, Gazder AA (2018) Investigation into the viability of K-TIG for joining armour grade quenched and tempered steel. J Manuf Process 32:482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumbhar K, Senthil PP, Gogia AK (2017) Microstructural observations on the terminal penetration of long rod projectile. Def Technol 13(6):413–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pramanick AK, Das H, Reddy GM, Ghosh M, Das G, Nandy S, Pal TK (2016) Development and design of microstructure based coated electrode for ballistic performance of shielded metal arc welded armour steel joints. Mater Des 103:52–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar SN, Balasubramanian V, Malarvizhi S, Rahman AH, Balaguru V (2022) Effect of welding consumables on shielded metal arc welded ultra high hard armour steel joints. J Mech Behav Mater 31(1):8–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Choudhary S, Singh PK, Khare S, Kumar K, Mahajan P, Verma RK (2020) Ballistic impact behaviour of newly developed armour grade steel: an experimental and numerical study. Int J Impact Eng 140:103557

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors wish to record sincere thanks to the Directorate of Extramural Research & Intellectual Property Rights (ERIPR), Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Ministry of Defence, Government of India, New Delhi and Research Innovation Centre (RIC), DRDO, Chennai for the financial support rendered through an R&D Project No: EPIR/EP/RIC/2016/1/M/01/1630. The authors are grateful to the Director, Combat Vehicles Research & Development Establishment (CVRDE), DRDO, Avadi, Chennai for providing base materials to carry out this investigation. The authors wish to thank the Director, Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory (DMRL), DRDO, Hyderabad for granting permission to conduct the ballistic test.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Naveen Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naveen Kumar, S., Balasubramanian, V., Malarvizhi, S. et al. Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Ballistic Performance of Ultra High Hard Armour Steel Joints Welded Using Shielded Metal Arc Welding Process and Austenitic Stainless Steel Electrode. J. dynamic behavior mater. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-024-00421-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-024-00421-1

Keywords

Navigation