Advertisement

An Analysis of Strengthening Mechanisms and Rate-Dependence in a High Strength Aluminum Alloy

  • B. Cao
  • M. Shaeffer
  • D. Cadel
  • K. T. Ramesh
  • S. Prasad
Article

Abstract

We examine the strengthening mechanisms within a high-strength aluminum alloy with the objective of providing guidelines for increased strength. First, we measure the mechanical behavior of the age-hardenable Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy known as Al 2139 in the T8 condition, and observe strengths of 500 MPa at quasistatic strain rates and average strengths of up to 600 MPa at high strain rates. Next, we explore the reasons for the high strength of this alloy by considering the contributions of various strengthening mechanisms to the total strength of the material. Finally, we develop an analytical approach to estimating the strengthening developed through the mechanism of dislocation cutting of closely spaced plate-like semi-coherent precipitates. Our results suggest that dislocation cutting of the \(\Omega\) phase is the primary strengthening mechanism in this alloy.

Keywords

Mechanisms Strength High strain rate Aluminum 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the Army Research Laboratory under ARMAC-RTP Cooperative Agreement number W911NF-06-2-0006. KTR acknowledges support from the Army Research Laboratory through Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-12-2-0022. We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of D. Nguyen with Kolsky bar tests, and of Dr. Kenneth Livi with the STEM.

References

  1. 1.
    Li BQ, Wawner FE (2000) Aluminium alloys: their physical and mechanical properties, pts 1-3. In: Starke EA, Sanders TH, Cassada WA (eds) Aluminium alloys: their physical and mechanical properties, pts 1-3. pp 1359–1364Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nie JF, Muddle BC, Polmear IJ (1996) Aluminium alloys: their physical and mechanical properties, pts 1-3. In: Driver JH, Dubost B, Durand F, Fougeres R, Guyot P, Sainfort P et al (eds) Aluminium alloys: their physical and mechanical properties, pts 1-3. pp 1257–1262Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bakavos D, Prangnell PB, Bes B, Eberl F (2008) The effect of silver on microstructural evolution in two 2xxx series Al-alloys with a high Cu : Mg ratio during ageing to a T8 temper. Mater Sci Eng A 491(1–2):214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu AW, Gable BM, Shiflet GJ, Starke EA (2004) Trace element effects on precipitation in Al-Cu-Mg-(Ag, Si) alloys: a computational analysis. Acta Mater 52(12):3671–3679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li BQ, Wawner FE (1998) Dislocation interaction with semicoherent precipitates (Omega phase) in deformed Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy. Acta Mater 46(15):5483–5490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ringer SP, Sakurai T, Polmear IJ (1997) Origins of hardening in aged Al-Cu-Mg-(Ag) alloys. Acta Mater 45(9):3731–3744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gable BM, Shiflet GJ, Starke E (2006) A Alloy development for the enhanced stability of Omega precipitates in Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 37A(4):1091–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cho A, Bes B (2006) Damage tolerance capability of an Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy(2139). In: Poole WJ, Wells MA, Lloyd DJ (eds) Aluminium alloys 2006, pts 1 and 2: research through innovation and technology. pp 603–608Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vural M, Caro J (2009) Experimental analysis and constitutive modeling for the newly developed 2139-T8 alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 520(1–2):56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elkhodary K, Sun LP, Irving DL, Brenner DW, Ravichandran G, Zikry MA (2009) Inte-grated experimental, atomistic, and microstructurally based finite element investigation of the dynamic compressive behavior of 2139 aluminum. J Appl Mech 76(5):051306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Casem DT, Dandekar DP (2009) Response of aluminum 2139-T8 to shock loading. In: Elert ML, Buttler WT, Furnish MD, Anderson WW, Proud W G (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter - 2009, pts 1 and 2. pp 973–976Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee WM, Zikry MA (2011) Microstructural characterization of a high-strength aluminum alloy subjected to high strain-rate impact. Metall Mater Trans A 42A(5):1215–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elkhodary K, Lee W, Sun LP, Brenner DW, Zikry MA (2011) Deformation mechanisms of an Omega precipitate in a high-strength aluminum alloy subjected to high strain rates. J Mater Res 26(4):487–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salem HG, Lee WM, Bodelot L, Ravichandran G, Zikry MA (2012) Quasi-static and high-strain-rate experimental microstructural investigation of a high-strength aluminum alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 43A(6):1895–1901.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-1064-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Casem DT, Dandekar DP (2012) Shock and mechanical response of 2139-T8 aluminum Shock and mechanical response of 2139-T8 aluminum. J Appl Phys.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3694661
  16. 16.
    Ramesh KT (2008) High strain rate and impact experiments. In: Sharpe WN (ed) Springer handbook of experimental solid mechanics. Springer, New York, pp 929–960Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yadav S, Chichili D, Ramesh KT (1995) The mechanical response of a 6061–T6 Al/Al2O3 metal-matrix composite at high-rates of deformation. Acta Metall Mater 43(12):4453–4464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kendig KL, Miracle DB (2002) Strengthening mechanisms of an Al-Mg-Sc-Zr alloy. Acta Mater 50(16):4165–4175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huskins EL, Cao B, Ramesh KT (2010) Strengthening mechanisms in an Al-Mg alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 527(6):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reich L, Murayama M, Hono K (1998) Evolution of phase in an AlCuMgAg alloya three-dimensional atom probe study. Acta Mater 46(17):6053–6062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zander J, Sandstrom R, Vitos L (2007) Modelling mechanical properties for non-hardenable aluminium alloys. Comput Mater Sci 41(1):86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zander J, Sandstrom R (2008) One parameter model for strength properties of hardenable aluminium alloys. Mater Des 29(8):1540–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Polmear IJ (1960) A trace element effect in alloys based on the aluminum-zinc-magnesium system. Nature 186:303–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang SC, Li CZ, Yan MG (1989) Determination of structure of Al20Cu2Mn3 phase in Al-Cu-Mn alloys. Mater Res Bull 24(10):1267–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhu AW, Starke EA (1999) Strengthening effect of unshearable particles of finite size: a computer experimental study. Acta Mater 47(11):3263–3269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chester R, Polmear IJ (1983) The metallurgy of light alloys. Institution of Metal-lurgists, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang SC, Starink MJ (2005) Precipitates and intermetallic phases in precipitation hardening Al-Cu-Mg-(Li) based alloys. Int Mater Rev 50(4):193–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ardell AJ (1995) Intermetallics as precipitates and dispersoids in high-strength alloys. In: Westbrook JH, Fleischer RL (eds) Intermetallic compounds—principles and practice. Wiley, Chichester, Sussex, pp 257–86Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li BQ, Wawner FE (1997) Observation of dislocation cutting Omega phase and its strengthening mechanism in an Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy. Microsc Microanal 3(2):139–145Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang JC, Ardell AJ (1987) Strengthening mechanisms associated with T1 particles in 2 Al-Li-Cu alloys. J Phys 48:373–383Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Argon AS (2008) Strengthening mechanisms in crystal plasticity. Oxford series on materials modeling. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sun L, Irving DL, Zikry MA, Brenner DW (2009) First-principles investigation of the structure and synergistic chemical bonding of Ag and Mg at the Al vertical bar Omega interface in a Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy. Acta Mater 57(12):3522–3528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sun LP (2010) Personal communication: interfacial energiesGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Meyers MA, Chawla KK (2008) Mechanical behavior of materials, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cao BY, Joshi SP, Ramesh KT (2009) Strengthening mechanisms in cryomilled ultrafine- grained aluminum alloy at quasi-static and dynamic rates of loading. Scripta Mater 60(8):619–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Taha AS, Hammad FH (1990) Application of the Hall-Petch relation to microhardness measurements on Al, Cu, Al-Md 105, and Al-Cu alloys. Phys Status Solidi a 119(2):455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Witkin D, Lavernia EJ (2006) Synthesis and mechanical behavior of nanostructured materials via cryomilling. Prog Mater Sci 51(1):1–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.CSIR-National Metallurgical LaboratoryJamshedpurIndia

Personalised recommendations