Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A simple approach to account for seasonality in the description of extreme ocean environments

  • Published:
Marine Systems & Ocean Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental contours are often applied in structural reliability assessment and design of ships and other marine structures. Such contours are a practical tool for identifying joint extreme values of environmental variables to determine critical design conditions for the environmental loads. This may be used in the analysis of extreme structural responses and is particularly useful for structures with complicated response behaviour where full long-term analyses are not feasible. Environmental contours are typically calculated based on a joint probability distribution function established for the relevant input parameters, for example significant wave height and wave period, and stationary conditions are often assumed when fitting such models. However, non-stationarities due to, e.g., seasonality or directionality will often be important and this paper presents a simple approach for accounting for such non-stationary ocean environments in the construction of environmental contours. The usefulness of this simple approach is demonstrated by an example, where seasonally varying environmental contours are constructed. Different environmental contours are estimated for every week of the year and it is shown that these contours vary considerably between weeks. Contours corresponding to some average annual condition can also be made and compared to contours established without regard to seasonal variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O.J. Aarnes, M. Reistad, Ø. Breivik, E. Bitner-Gregersen, L.I. Eide, O. Gramstad, A.K. Magnusson, B. Natvig, E. Vanem, Projected changes in significant wave height towards the end of the 21st century—Northeast Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 3394–3403 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Armstrong, C. Chin, I. Penesis,, Y. Drobyshevski, Sensitivity of vessel responses to environmental contours of extreme sea states. In: Proceedings of 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2015). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) (2015)

  3. G.S. Baarholm, S. Haver, Application of environmental contour lines—a summary of a number of case studies. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Floating Structures for Deepwater Operations. ASRANet (2009)

  4. G.S. Baarholm, S. Haver, O.D. Økland, Combining contours of significant wave height and peak period with platform response distributions for predicting design response. Mar. Struct. 23, 147–163 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G.S. Baarholm, T. Moan, Application of contour line method to estimate extreme ship hull loads considering operational restrictions. J. Ship Res. 45, 228–240 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.S. Baarholm, H. Sverre, C.M. Larsen, Wave sector dependent contour lines. In: Proceedings of 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2007). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) (2007)

  7. E.M. Bitner-Gregersen, Joint met-ocean description for design and operation of marine structures. Appl. Ocean Res. 51, 279–292 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DNV: Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads. Det Norske Veritas (2014). DNV-RP-C205

  9. K. Ewans, P. Jonathan, Evaluating environmental joint extremes for the offshore industry using the conditional extremes model. J. Mar. Syst. 130, 124–130 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A.F. Haselsteiner, J.H. Ohlendorf, W. Wosniok, K.D. Thoben, Deriving environmental contours from highest density regions. Coast. Eng. 123, 42–51 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Haver, Analysis of uncertainties related to the stochastic modelling of ocean waves. Tech. Rep. UR-80-09, Norges tekniske høgskole (1980)

  12. S. Haver, On the joint distribution of heights and periods of sea waves. Ocean Eng. 14, 359–376 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Haver, K. Bruserud, Environmental contour method: An approximate method for obtaining characteristic response extremes for design purposes. In: Proceedings of 13th International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting and 4th Coastal Hazard Symposium (2013)

  14. S. Haver, S. Winterstein, Environmental contour lines: a method for estimating long term extremes by a short term analysis. Trans. Soc. Naval Archit. Mar. Eng. 116, 116–127 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.E. Heffernan, J.A. Tawn, A conditional approach for multivariate extreme values. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 66, 497–546 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. A.B. Huseby, E. Vanem, K. Eskeland, Evaluating properties of environmental contours. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2017. European Safety and Reliability Association(ESRA) (2017)

  17. A.B. Huseby, E. Vanem, B. Natvig, A new approach to environmental contours for ocean engineering applications based on direct Monte Carlo simulations. Ocean Eng. 60, 124–135 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A.B. Huseby, E. Vanem, B. Natvig, A new Monte Carlo method for environmental contour estimation. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2014. European Safety and Reliability Association(ESRA) (2014)

  19. A.B. Huseby, E. Vanem, B. Natvig, Alternative environmental contours for structural reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 54, 32–45 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Jonathan, K. Ewans, Statistical modelling of extreme ocean environments for marine design: a review. Ocean Eng. 62, 91–109 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Jonathan, K. Ewans, J. Flynn, On the estimation of ocean engineering design contours. In: Proceedings of 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2011). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) (2011)

  22. B.J. Leira, A comparison of stochastic process models for definition of design contours. Struct. Saf. 30, 493–505 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Q. Li, Z. Gao, T. Moan, Modified environmental contour method for predicting long-term extreme responses of bottom-fixed offshore wind turbines. Mar. Struct. 48, 15–32 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. L.D. Lutes, S.R. Winterstein, A dynamic inverse FORM method: design contours for load combination problems. Probab. Eng. Mech. 44, 118–127 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Montes-Iturrizaga, E. Heredia-Zavoni, Environmental contours using copulas. Appl. Ocean Res. 52, 125–139 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Montes-Iturrizaga, E. Heredia-Zavoni, Multivariate environmental contours using C-vine copulas. Ocean Eng. 118, 68–82 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M.J. Muliawan, Z. Gao, T. Moan, Application of the contour line method for estimating extreme responses in the mooring lines of a two-body floating wave energy converter. J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng. 135(03,1301), 1–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.M. Niedzwwecki, J. van de Lindt, J. Yao, Estimating extreme tendon response using environmental contours. Eng. Struct. 20, 601–607 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. NORSOK: NORSOK Standard N-003:2017. Action and action effects (2017). Edition 3

  30. T. Øyri, Contour methods for deepwater riser systems. NTNU (2014). Master Thesis

  31. D. Randell, G. Feld, K. Ewans, P. Jonathan, Distributions of return values for the ocean wave characteristics in the South China Sea using directional-seasonal extreme value analysis. Environmetrics 26, 442–450 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. D. Randell, K. Turnbull, K. Ewans, P. Jonathan, Bayesian inference for nonstationary marginal extremes. Environmetrics 27, 439–450 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. E. Ross, D. Randell, K. Ewans, G. Feld, P. Jonathan, Efficient estimation of return value distributions from non-stationary marginal extreme value models using Bayesian inference. Ocean Eng. 142, 315–328 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. K. Saranyasoontorn, L. Manuel, Design loads for wind turbines using the environmental contour method. In: 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, pp. AIAA 2006–1365. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (2006)

  35. F. Serinaldi, Dismissing return periods!. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 29, 1179–1189 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. F. Serinaldi, C.G. Kilsby, Stationarity is undead: Uncertainty dominates the distribution of extremes. Adv. Water Resour. 77, 17–36 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. F. Silva-González, E. Heredia-Zavoni, R. Montes-Iturrizaga, Development of environmental contours using Nataf distribution model. Ocean Eng. 58, 27–34 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. J.E. Stopa, K.F. Cheung, Periodicity and patterns of ocean wind and wave climate. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 119, 5563–5584 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. E. Vanem, Statistical analysis of univariate extremes and bivariate distributions of wave data and climate change projections. Tech. Rep. 2014-1672, Rev. 02, DNV GL (2014)

  40. E. Vanem, Non-stationary extreme value models to account for trends and shifts in the extreme wave climate due to climate change. Appl. Ocean Res. 52, 201–211 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. E. Vanem, Uncertainties in extreme value modeling of wave data in a climate change perspective. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 1, 339–359 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. E. Vanem, Joint statistical models for significant wave height and wave period in a changing climate. Mar. Struct. 49, 180–205 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. E. Vanem, A comparison study on the estimation of extreme structural response from different environmental contour methods. Mar. Struct. 56, 137–162 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. E. Vanem, E.M. Bitner-Gregersen, Alternative environmental contours for marine structural design—a comparison study. J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng. 137(051601), 1–8 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  45. E. Vanem, A.B. Huseby, B. Natvig, A Bayesian hierarchical spatio-temporal model for significant wave height in the North Atlantic. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 26, 609–632 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. E. Vanem, A.B. Huseby, B. Natvig, Modeling ocean wave climate with a Bayesian hierarchical space-time model and a log-transform of the data. Ocean Dyn. 62, 355–375 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. S. Winterstein, T. Ude, C. Cornell, P. Bjerager, S. Haver, Environmental parameters for extreme response: Inverse FORM with omission factors. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (1993)

  48. S.R. Winterstein, Environmental contours for sub-populations: effects of wind-wave direction and cut-out wind speed. Tech. Rep. TN 2016-071, Probability-Based Engineering (2016)

  49. S.R. Winterstein, A.K. Jha, S. Kumar, Reliability of floating structures: extreme response and load factor design. J. Waterway Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 125, 163–169 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. S. Yue, P. Rasmussen, Bivariate frequency analysis: discussion of some useful concepts in hydrological application. Hydrol. Process. 16, 2881–2898 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this paper has been carried out within the research project ECSADES, with support from the Research Council of Norway (RCN) under the MARTEC II ERA-NET initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DNV GL Group Technology and Research, Veritasveien 1, 1322, Høvik, Norway

    Erik Vanem

Authors
  1. Erik Vanem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Vanem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vanem, E. A simple approach to account for seasonality in the description of extreme ocean environments. Mar Syst Ocean Technol 13, 63–73 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40868-018-0046-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40868-018-0046-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation