Skip to main content

The Integrated Cognitive Antisocial Potential (ICAP) Theory: Past, Present, and Future

Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology volume 6, pages 172–187 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The main aim of this article is to review the past, present, and future of the Integrated Cognitive Antisocial Potential (ICAP) theory.

Method

In the ICAP theory, the key underlying theoretical construct is antisocial potential (AP). It is proposed that long-term, slowly changing, between-individual differences in AP depend primarily on strain, modeling, and socialization processes, while short-term, quickly changing, within-individual variations in AP depend on situational influences such as being bored, angry, drunk, or frustrated, and the availability of opportunities and victims. Whether the potential becomes the actuality of offending depends on a cognitive decision-making process that takes account of perceived costs, benefits, and probabilities of outcomes.

Results

This article reviews the initial development of the ICAP theory (the past) and then the current form of the theory (the present). It then presents the results of some empirical tests of the theory. Finally (the future), it reviews some possible improvements to the theory, some predictions concerning controversial issues that might challenge the theory, some desirable empirical tests of the theory, and its policy implications for crime reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Augimeri, L. K., Walsh, M. M., Liddon, A. D., & Dassinger, C. R. (2011). From risk identification to risk management: A comprehensive strategy for young children engaged in antisocial behavior. In D. W. Springer & A. R. Roberts (Eds.), Juvenile justice and delinquency (pp. 117–140). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnett, A., Blumstein, A., & Farrington, D. P. (1987). Probabilistic models of youthful criminal careers. Criminology, 25, 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett, A., Blumstein, A., & Farrington, D. P. (1989). A prospective test of a criminal career model. Criminology, 27, 373–388.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basto-Pereira, M., & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Advancing knowledge about lifelong crime sequences. British Journal of Criminology, 59, 354–377.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bernard, T. J. (1990). Twenty years of testing theories: What have we learned and why? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 325–347.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, R. V. (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed.). Guilderland, NY: Harrow and Heston.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice (Vol. 6, pp. 147–185). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farrington, D. P. (1972). Delinquency begins at home. New Society, 21, 495–497.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Farrington, D. P. (1973). Self-reports of deviant behavior: Predictive and stable? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Farrington, D. P. (1974). Explanations of juvenile delinquency. In A. Morris (Ed.), The lawbreakers (pp. 18–29). London: BBC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Farrington, D. P. (1977). The effects of public labelling. British Journal of Criminology, 17, 112–125.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Farrington, D. P. (1979). Environmental stress, delinquent behavior, and convictions. In I. G. Sarason & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 6, pp. 93–107). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Farrington, D. P. (1983). Offending from 10 to 25 years of age. In K. T. Van Dusen & S. A. Mednick (Eds.), Prospective studies of crime and delinquency (pp. 17–37). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Farrington, D. P. (1986). Stepping stones to adult criminal careers. In D. Olweus, J. Block, & M. R. Yarrow (Eds.), Development of antisocial and prosocial behavior: Research, theories and issues (pp. 359–384). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Farrington, D. P. (1992). Explaining the beginning, progress, and ending of antisocial behavior from birth to adulthood. In J. McCord (Ed.), Facts, frameworks and forecasts: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 3, pp. 253–286). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Farrington, D. P. (1993). Motivations for conduct disorder and delinquency. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Farrington, D. P. (1995a). Key issues in the integration of motivational and opportunity-reducing crime prevention strategies. In P.-O. H. Wikstrom, R. V. Clarke, & J. McCord (Eds.), Integrating crime prevention strategies: Propensity and opportunity (pp. 333–357). Stockholm: National Council for Crime Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Farrington, D. P. (1995b). The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 929–964.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Farrington, D. P. (1996). The explanation and prevention of youthful offending. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 68–148). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Farrington, D. P. (1998). Predictors, causes, and correlates of male youth violence. In M. Tonry & M. H. Moore (Eds.), Youth violence (crime and justice) (Vol. 24, pp. 421–475). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Farrington, D. P. (2000). Explaining and preventing crime: The globalization of knowledge -- the American Society of Criminology 1999 Presidential Address. Criminology, 38, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Farrington, D. P. (2003). Developmental and life-course criminology: Key theoretical and empirical issues – The 2002 Sutherland award address. Criminology, 42, 211–255.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Farrington, D. P. (2005). Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Farrington, D. P. (2006). Building developmental and life-course theories of offending. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 335–364). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Farrington, D.P. (2019). The development of violence from age 8 to 61. Aggressive Behavior, in press.

  29. Farrington, D. P., Berkowitz, L., & West, D. J. (1982). Differences between individual and group fights. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 323–333.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Farrington, D. P., Gaffney, H., Losel, F., & Ttofi, M. M. (2017). Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of developmental prevention programs in reducing delinquency, aggression and bullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Farrington, D. P., & Hawkins, J. D. (1991). Predicting participation, early onset, and later persistence in officially recorded offending. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 1, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Farrington, D. P., & Koegl, C. J. (2015). Monetary benefits and costs of the Stop Now And Plan program for boys aged 6-11, based on the prevention of later offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 263–287.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R. (1999). Transatlantic replicability of risk factors in the development of delinquency. In P. Cohen, C. Slomkowski, & L. N. Robins (Eds.), Historical and geographical influences on psychopathology (pp. 299–329). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2003). How can the relationship between race and violence be explained? In D. F. Hawkins (Ed.), Violent crime: Assessing race and ethnic differences (pp. 213–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., Yin, Y., & Anderson, S. J. (2002). Are within-individual causes of delinquency the same as between-individual causes? Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 12, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Farrington, D. P., MacLeod, J. F., & Piquero, A. R. (2016). Mathematical models of criminal careers: Deriving and testing quantitative predictions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53, 336–355.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Farrington, D. P., & McGee, T. R. (2017). The Integrated Cognitive Antisocial Potential (ICAP) theory: Empirical testing. In A. A. J. Blokland & V. R. Van der Geest (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of life-course criminology (pp. 11–28). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Farrington, D. P., & McGee, T. R. (2019). The Integrated Cognitive Antisocial Potential (ICAP) theory: New empirical tests. In D. P. Farrington, L. Kazemian, & A. R. Piquero (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental and life-course criminology (pp. 173–192). New York: Oxford University Press.

  39. Farrington, D. P., & Murray, J. (Eds.). (2014). Labeling theory: Empirical tests. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Farrington, D. P., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2013). Offending from childhood to late middle age: Recent results from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., Crago, R. V., & Coid, J. W. (2014). Prevalence, frequency, onset, desistance and criminal career duration in self-reports compared with official records. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 24, 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., Crago, R. V., & Coid, J. W. (2015). Intergenerational similarities in risk factors for offending. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1, 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2016). Risk, promotive and protective factors in youth offending: Results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Farrington, D. P., & West, D. J. (1971). A comparison between early delinquents and young aggressives. British Journal of Criminology, 11, 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Huesmann, L. R. (1988). An information processing model for the development of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jennings, W. G., Loeber, R., Pardini, D. A., Piquero, A. R., & Farrington, D. P. (2016). Offending from childhood to young adulthood: Recent results from the Pittsburgh Youth Study. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 441–476.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jolliffe, D., Farrington, D. P., Piquero, A. R., Loeber, R., & Hill, K. G. (2017a). Systematic review of early risk factors for life-course-persistent, adolescence-limited and late-onset offenders in prospective longitudinal studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jolliffe, D., Farrington, D. P., Piquero, A. R., MacLeod, J. F., & Van de Weijer, S. (2017b). Prevalence of life-course-persistent, adolescence-limited and late-onset offenders: A systematic review of prospective longitudinal studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Juby, H., & Farrington, D. P. (2001). Disentangling the link between disrupted families and delinquency. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Loeber, R., Jennings, W. G., Ahonen, L., Piquero, A. R., & Farrington, D. P. (2017). Female delinquency from childhood to young adulthood: Recent results from the Pittsburgh Girls Study. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Moffitt, T. E. (2018). Male antisocial behavior in adolescence and beyond. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., & Eisner, M. P. (2009). Drawing conclusions about causes from systematic reviews of risk factors: The Cambridge Quality Checklists. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Nagin, D. S., & Farrington, D. P. (1992). The onset and persistence of offending. Criminology, 30, 501–523.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice (Vol. 30, pp. 359–506). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Portnoy, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2015). Resting heart rate and antisocial behavior: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 22, 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1974). Criminology (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Theobald, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2009). Effects of getting married on offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of males. European Journal of Criminology, 6, 496–516.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tonry, M., Ohlin, L. E., & Farrington, D. P. (1991). Human development and criminal behavior: New ways of advancing knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Trasler, G. B. (1962). The explanation of criminality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Van der Laan, A., Blom, M., & Kleemans, E. R. (2009). Exploring long-term and short-term risk factors for serious delinquency. European Journal of Criminology, 6, 419–438.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Criminology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, England

    David P. Farrington

Authors
  1. David P. Farrington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David P. Farrington.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farrington, D.P. The Integrated Cognitive Antisocial Potential (ICAP) Theory: Past, Present, and Future. J Dev Life Course Criminology 6, 172–187 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-019-00112-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-019-00112-9

Keywords

  • Integrated cognitive antisocial potential theory
  • Development of offending
  • Situational influences
  • Decision-making