The Protective Effects of Family Support on the Relationship Between Official Intervention and General Delinquency Across the Life Course
- 509 Downloads
Previous research on the labeling perspective has identified mediational processes and the long-term effects of official intervention in the life course. However, it is not yet clear what factors may moderate the relationship between labeling and subsequent offending. The current study integrates Cullen’s (Justice Q 11:527–559, 1994) social support theory to examine how family social support conditions the criminogenic, stigmatizing effects of official intervention on delinquency and whether such protective effects vary by developmental stage.
Using longitudinal data from the Rochester Youth Development Study, we estimated negative binomial regression models to investigate the relationships between police arrest, family social support, and criminal offending during both adolescence and young adulthood.
Police arrest is a significant predictor of self-reported delinquency in both the adolescent and adult models. Expressive family support exhibits main effects in the adolescent models; instrumental family support exhibits main effects at both developmental stages. Additionally, instrumental family support diminishes some of the predicted adverse effects of official intervention in adulthood.
Perception of family support can be critical in reducing general delinquency as well as buffering against the adverse effects of official intervention on subsequent offending. Policies and programs that work with families subsequent to a criminal justice intervention should emphasize the importance of providing a supportive environment for those who are labeled.
KeywordsLabeling theory Official intervention Social support Life course Moderation
Support for the Rochester Youth Development Study has been provided by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (86-JN-CX-0007), the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA020195, R01DA005512), the National Science Foundation (SBR-9123299), and the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH63386). Work on this project was also aided by grants to the Center for Social and Demographic Analysis at the University at Albany from NICHD (P30HD32041) and NSF (SBR-9512290). Official arrest data were provided electronically by the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services.
Points of view, conclusions, and methodological strategies in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the funding agencies or data sources.
- 1.Hirschi, T. (1980). Labeling theory and juvenile delinquency: an assessment of the evidence. In W. R. Gove (Ed.), The labeling of deviance: evaluating a perspective (pp. 181–204). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- 2.Tittle, C. R. (1980). Labeling and crime: an empirical evaluation. In W. R. Gove (Ed.), The labeling of deviance: evaluating a perspective (pp. 241–263). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- 4.Ciaravolo, E. B. (2011). Once a criminal, always a criminal: how do individual responses to formal labeling affect future behavior? A comprehensive evaluation of labeling theory (Doctoral dissertation). College of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Florida State University.Google Scholar
- 6.Krohn, M. D., & Lopes, G. (2015). Labeling theory. In M. D. Krohn & J. Lane (Eds.), The handbook of juvenile delinquency and juvenile justice (pp. 312–330). Malden: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 10.Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social pathology: a systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- 11.Barrick, K. (2014). A review of prior tests of labeling theory. In D. P. Farrington & J. Murray (Eds.), Labeling theory: empirical tests. Advances in criminological theory (18th ed., pp. 89–112). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
- 19.Lofland, J. (1969). Deviance and identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- 22.Makarios, M. D., & Sams, T. L. (2013). Social support and crime. In F. T. Cullen & P. Wilcox (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminological theory (pp. 160–187). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 27.Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 28.Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In T. P. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency. Advances in criminological theory (7th ed., pp. 133–162). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
- 31.Krohn, M. D., Lopes, G., & Ward, J. T. (2014). Effects of official intervention on later offending in the Rochester Youth Development Study. In D. P. Farrington & J. Murray (Eds.), Labeling theory: empirical tests. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 18, pp. 179–208). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
- 37.Sherman, L. W., Schmidt, J. D., & Rogan, D. P. (1992). Policing domestic violence: experiments and dilemmas. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- 38.Sherman, L. W. (2014). Experiments in criminal sanctions: labeling, defiance, and restorative justice. In D. P. Farrington & J. Murray (Eds.), Labeling theory: empirical tests. Advances in criminological theory. Volume 18 (pp. 149–176). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
- 41.Shaw, C., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- 45.Vaux, A. (1988). Social support: theory, research, and intervention. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- 48.Cullen, F. T., & Wright, J. P. (1997). Liberating the anomie-strain paradigm: implications from social support theory. In N. Passas & R. Agnew (Eds.), The future of anomie theory (pp. 187–206). Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
- 52.Rosenberg, M., & McCullough, C. B. (1981). Mattering: inferred significance and mental health among adolescents. Research in Community and Mental Health, 2, 163–182.Google Scholar
- 54.Sullivan, M. L. (1989). Getting paid: youth crime and work in the inner city. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- 55.Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- 61.Koverola, C., Papas, M. A., Pitts, S., Murtaugh, C., Black, M. M., & Dubowitz, H. (2005). Longitudinal investigation of the relationship among maternal victimization, depressive symptoms, social support, and children’s behavior and development. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1523–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Owen, A. E., Thompson, M. P., Mitchell, M. D., Kennebrew, S. Y., Paranjape, A., Reddick, T. L., Hargrove, G. L., & Kaslow, L. (2008). Perceived social support as a mediator of the link between intimate partner conflict and child adjustment. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 71.Farrington, D. P. (2011). Families and crime. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime and public policy (pp. 130–157). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 72.Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
- 73.Conger, R. D. (1991). Adolescence and youth: psychological development in a changing world (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- 75.Lemert, E. M. (1972). Human deviance, social problems, and social control. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- 76.Schur, E. M. (1971). Labeling deviant behavior. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- 84.Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- 86.Vigil, J. D. (1988). Barrio gangs: street life and identity in Southern California. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- 87.Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 88.Farrall, S. (2004). Social capital and offender reintegration: making probation desistance focused. In S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon (Eds.), After crime and punishment: pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 57–82). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar