The Glueck Women: Using the Past to Assess and Extend Contemporary Understandings of Women’s Desistance from Crime




Recent increases in rates of female offending and associated longitudinal data collection efforts focusing on females have contributed to important advances in our understanding of the theoretical mechanisms that shape female offending from onset through desistance. Even so, this literature lacks a historical context against which we can assess the scope and breadth of recent empirical findings and their related theoretical implications. Focusing on desistance, we address this gap with analyses of life history data from a sample of female offenders collected by Sheldon and Eleanor Glueck in the early twentieth century. Using these data, the current study provides a historical backdrop against which we compare contemporary theoretical and empirical findings on desistance, specifically the broad influence and specific character of external change mechanisms for women’s desistance.


Using complete retrospective life history and prospective follow-up data for 424 female offenders (264 of whom are desisters), we use logistic regression and conjunctive analysis to assess the influence of key external change mechanisms on the likelihood of desistance.


Findings indicate that, as with contemporary samples, external change mechanisms (marriage, motherhood, and work) are implicated in desistance. However, the specific pattern of effects suggests important and historically contingent differences in how these mechanisms operate over time.


We conclude that external change mechanisms not only activate informal social controls and commitments to a non-criminal identity, they implicate compliance with gendered social norms. As these norms change, the salience and character of key external change mechanisms for women’s desistance should also change. Of course, this is also the case for males, and we encourage desistance researchers to consider the importance of gender as a social institution and the ways in which it conditions the external change mechanisms available to offenders.


Gender Desistance Life course criminology Women’s history 



The authors thank Susan Dennison, Rebecca Wickes, and Li Erickson for their critical comments on earlier versions of this paper. We also acknowledge funding from the National Institute of Justice under grant #2001-IJ-CX-0034.


  1. 1.
    Chesney-Lind, M. (2006). Patriarchy, crime, and justice feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broidy, L. M., Stewart, A. L., Thompson, C. M., Chrzanowski, A., Allard, T., & Dennison, S. M. (2015). Life course offending pathways across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(2), 118–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cauffman, E., Monahan, K., & Thomas, A. (2015). Pathways to persistence: female offending from 14 to 25. Journal of Developmental and Life Course Criminology, 1(3), 236–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rodermond, E., Kruttschnitt, C., Slotboom, A. M., & Bijleveld, C. C. (2015). Female desistance: a review of the literature. European Journal of Criminology. doi: 10.1177/1477370815597251.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bushway, S. D., Piquero, A. R., Broidy, L. M., Cauffman, E., & Mazerolle, P. (2001). An empirical framework for studying desistance as a process. Criminology, 39(2), 491–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farrall, S., Sharpe, G., Hunter, B., & Calvery, A. (2011). Theorizing structural and individual-level processes in desistance and persistence: outlining an integrated perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 218–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maruna, S. (2004). Desistance from crime and explanatory style: a new direction in the psychology of reform. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20(2), 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1156.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1934). 500 delinquent women. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith, K. M. (1994). New paths to power: American women 1890–1920. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kessler-Harris, A. (2003). Out to work: a history of wage-earning women in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Odem, M. E. (1995). Delinquent daughters: protecting and policing adolescent female sexuality in the United States, 1885–1920. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peiss, K. (1986). Cheap amusements: working women and leisure in turn-of-the-century New York. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pollak, O. (1950). The criminality of women. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perry, E. I. (1985). ‘The general motherhood of the commonwealth’: dance hall reform in the progressive era. American Quarterly, 37(5), 719–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boritch, H., & Hagan, J. (1990). Gender, class, and patterns of social control, 1859–1955. Criminology, 28(4), 567–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Freedman, E. B. (1981). Their sisters’ keepers: women’s prison reform in America, 1830–1930. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rafter, N. H. (1990). Partial justice: women, prisons and social control. New Jersey: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2004). The female offender: girls, women, and crime (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bersani, B. E., Laub, J. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2008). Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: do gender and socio-historical context matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    King, R. D., Massoglia, M., & Macmillan, R. (2007). The context of marriage and crime: gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology, 45(1), 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Skardhamer, T., & Savolainen, J. (2014). Changes in criminal offending around the time of job entry: a study of employment and desistance. Criminology, 52(2), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zoutewelle-Terovan, M., van der Geest, V., Liefbroer, A., & Bijleveld, C. (2014). Criminality and family formation: effects of marriage and parenthood on criminal behavior for men and women. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 1209–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Doherty, E. E., & Ensminger, M. E. (2013). Marriage and offending among a cohort of disadvantaged African-Americans. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(1), 104–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Craig, J., & Foster, H. (2013). Desistance in the transition to adulthood: the roles of marriage, military and gender. Deviant Behvaior, 34(3), 208–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Monahan, K., Dmitrieva, J., & Cauffman, E. (2014). Bad romance: gender differences in the longitudinal association between romantic relationships and deviant behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24, 12–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Opsal, T. (2012). ‘Livin’ on the straights’: identity, desistance, and work among women post-incarceration. Sociological Inquiry, 82(3), 378–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kraeger, D. A., Matsueda, R. L., & Erosheva, E. A. (2010). Motherhood and criminal desistance in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Criminology, 48(1), 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: who did, does, or will do it and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91(1), 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Haynes, M. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: marriage, parenthood, and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(2), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hunt, G., Joe-Laidler, K., & MacKenzie, K. (2005). Moving into motherhood: gang girls and controlled risk. Youth & Society, 36(3), 333–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bachman, R., Kerrison, E. M., Paternoster, R., Smith, L., & O’Connell, D. (2016). The complex relationship between motherhood and desistance. Women & Criminal Justice, 26(3), 212–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ferraro, K., & Moe, A. (2003). Mothering, crime, and incarceration. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32(1), 9–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Enos, S. (2001). Mothering from the inside: parenting in a women’s prison. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Henriques, Z. W. (1982). Imprisoned mothers and their children: a descriptive and analytical study. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Watterson, K. (1996). Women in prison: inside the concrete womb. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Graham, J., & Bowling, B. (1996). Young people and crime (p. 145). London: Home Office Research Study.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Uggen, C., & Kruttschnitt, C. (1998). Crime in the breaking: gender differences in desistance. Law and Society Review, 32(2), 401–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Benda, B. B. (2005). Gender differences in life-course theory of recidivism: a survival analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(3), 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Savolainen, J. (2009). Work, family and criminal desistance: adult social bonds in a Nordic welfare state. British Journal of Criminology, 49(3), 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Van der Geest, V. R., Bijleveld, C. J., & Blokland, A. J. (2011). The effects of employment on longitudinal trajectories of offending: a follow-up of high-risk youth from 18 to 32 years of age. Criminology, 49(4), 1195–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2004). Employment, peers, and life-course transitions. Justice Quarterly, 21(1), 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lorber, J. (2004). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Griffin, M. L., & Armstrong, G. S. (2003). The effect of local life circumstances on female probationers’ offending. Justice Quarterly, 20(2), 213–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Alarid, L. F., Burton, V. S., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). Gender and crime among felony offender: assessing the generality of social bond and differential association. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37(2), 171–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Holtfretter, K., Reisig, M. D., & Morash, M. (2004). Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 3(2), 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Simons, R. L., Stewart, E., Gordon, L. C., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2002). A test of life course explanations for stability and change in antisocial behavior from adolescence into young adulthood. Criminology, 40(2), 410–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hart, T. C. (2014). Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations. JDiBrief Series. London: UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Snell, T. L. (1994). Women in prison (NCJ 145321). Washington DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Russell, B. B. (2013). Perceptions of female offenders: how stereotypes and social norms affect criminal justice responses. In B. B. Russell (Ed.), Perceptions of female offenders: how stereotypes and social norms affect criminal justice responses (pp. 1–9). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Social and Behavioral Science Gateway 4222University of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations