Smart application-aware IoT data collection

Abstract

We present and experimentally evaluate procedures for efficient IoT data collection while achieving target requirements in terms of data accuracy, response time, energy, and privacy protection. Different strategies are considered because different IoT applications can have different requirements. Specifically, the accuracy-driven strategy adjusts the time period between consecutive measurements following an additive increase and multiplicative decrease (AIMD) scheme based on a target data accuracy, while the time-driven strategy adjusts the time period between measurement requests to achieve delay less than a given maximum delay between consecutive measurements. The energy-driven strategy considers both the data accuracy and the energy costs for the corresponding measurements. Finally, the privacy-driven strategy adds noise to measurements using differential privacy techniques. The experimental evaluation involves real temperature, humidity, and ozone (O3) measurements obtained from three testbeds through the FIESTA-IoT platform. Our results show that the AIMD adaptation of the measurement period is robust to different types of measurements from different testbeds, without having any tuning parameters. Also, the experimental results show the trade-offs between the target data accuracy and the number of measurements and between the target data accuracy and the corresponding energy costs. For the privacy-driven strategy, the results show that the addition of noise to the sensor measurements using differential privacy has a negligible effect on the aggregate statistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Notes

  1. 1.

    FIESTA-IoT: Federated Interoperable Semantic IoT Testbeds and Applications, http://fiesta-iot.eu/.

  2. 2.

    In this paper we include a subset of our results. Interested users are encouraged to use our live demo located at https://mm.aueb.gr/fiesta/privacy.php.

  3. 3.

    The graphs for all other hours follow a similar pattern.

References

  1. 1.

    Dwork C, McSherry F, Nissim K, Smith A (2006) Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In: Halevi S, Rabin T (eds) Theory of cryptography. Springer, Berlin, pp 265–284

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Warner SL (1965) Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J Am Stat Assoc 60(309):63–69

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Erlingsson U, Pihur V, Korolova A (2014) RAPPOR: randomized aggregatable privacy-preserving ordinal response. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security

  4. 4.

    Chu D, Deshpande A, Hellerstein, J, Hong W (2006) Approximate data collection in sensor networks using probabilistic models. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICDE

  5. 5.

    Deshpande A, Guestrin C, Madden S, Hellerstein J, Hong W (2004) Model-driven data acquisition in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of VLDB

  6. 6.

    Jain A, Chang E, Wang Y.-F (2004) Adaptive stream resource management using Kalman filters. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD

  7. 7.

    Han Q, Mehrotra S, Venkatasubramanian N (2004) Energy efficient data collection in distributed sensor environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICDCS

  8. 8.

    Han Q, Hakkarinen D, Boonma P, Suzuki J (2010) Quality-aware sensor data collection. Int J Sens Netw 7(3):127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tang X, Xu J (2008) Adaptive data collection strategies for lifetime-constrained wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 19(6):721–734

  10. 10.

    Gedik B, Liu L, Yu PS (2007) ASAP: an adaptive sampling approach to data collection in sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 18(12):1766–1783

  11. 11.

    Liu C, Wu K, Pei J (2007) an energy-efficient data collection framework for wireless sensor networks by exploiting spatiotemporal correlation. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 18(7):1010–1023 (2007)

  12. 12.

    Wang C, Ma H, He Y, Xiong S (2012) Adaptive approximate data collection for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 23(6):1004–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Riahi M, Papaioannou T, Trummer I, Aberer (2013) Utility-driven data acquisition in participatory sensing. In: International conference on extending database technology: advances in database technology (EDBT)

  14. 14.

    Marjanovic M, Skorin-Kapov L, Pripuzic K, Antonic A, Zarko I (2016) Energy-aware and quality-driven sensor management for green mobile crowd sensing. J Netw Comput Appl 59:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Andres M, Bordenabe N, Chatzikokolakis K, Palamidessi C (2013) Geo-indistinguishability: differential privacy for location-based systems. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security

  16. 16.

    Fink GA (2016) Differentially private distributed sensing. In: Proceeding of 3rd IEEE world forum on internet of things (WF-IoT) (2016)

  17. 17.

    Chen J, Huadong M, Dong Z (2017) Private data aggregation with integrity assurance and fault tolerance for mobile crowd-sensing. Wirel Netw 23(1):131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the EU FIESTA-IoT project (Grant Agreement number: 643943 / H2020-ICT-2014-1) through the Open Call 3 Experiment “BeSmart: Smart IoT Data Collection” and by the Athens University of Economics and Business Research Center.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasilios A. Siris.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siris, V.A., Fotiou, N., Mertzianis, A. et al. Smart application-aware IoT data collection. J Reliable Intell Environ 5, 17–28 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-019-00077-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Data accuracy
  • Adaptive data collection
  • Differential privacy
  • Testbed experiments