Advertisement

Tropical Plant Pathology

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 306–313 | Cite as

Efficacy of Bacillus subtilis native strains for biocontrol of Phytophthora crown and root rot of pistachio in Iran

  • Mohammad Moradi
  • Fatemeh Jafari Nejad
  • Gholam Hosein Shahidi Bonjar
  • Seyed Reza Fani
  • Badrosadat Mahmudi Mimand
  • Claudia Probst
  • Mehrdad Madani
Original Article

Abstract

In Iran, Phytophthora crown and root rot of pistachio trees (also known as gummosis) destroys a significant number of fertile and non-fertile trees each year. To identify potential biocontrol agents effective in controlling pistachio gummosis, 200 soil samples were collected from 19 pistachio growing regions in Kerman province. Out of the 321 strains tested for antagonistic activity against Phytophthora pistaciae, 13 were selected as potential inhibitors of the disease. The tested strains were able to inhibit Phytophthora growth in dual culture, volatile and non-volatile assays by 14–72%, 12–68% and 27–85%, respectively. The highest inhibition was achieved by three strains identified as Bacillus subtilis using phenotypic characteristics, biochemical and physiological tests as well as sequencing the 16S rRNA genomic region for each strain. Co-inoculation experiments of six months old pistachio seedlings with P. pistaciae and the three selected B. subtilis strains reduced mortality rates by up to 80%. B. subtilis strain BSIPR35 was identified as the most promising biocontrol agent in greenhouse experiments. The ability of the selected strains to withstand drought, high temperature and salinity stresses was further tested. The growth of the strains was reduced under abiotic stresses ranging from 22 to 94%. All strains had the same growth under drought stress, while in salinity and under high temperature strain BSIPR35 acted superiorly compared to the other two strains. The bacterial strains may be effective in inhibiting gummosis in vivo, which requires further investigations.

Keywords

Bacillus subtilis Phytophthora Biological control Gummosis Pistachio Root and crown rot 

References

  1. Banihashemi Z (1994) Identification of Phytophthora species associated with pistachio gummosis in southern Iran. Acta Horticulturae 419:349–352Google Scholar
  2. Chen J, Hu LB, Zhou W, Yan SH, Yang JD, Xue YF, Shi ZQ (2010) Degradation of microcystin -LR and RR by a Stenotrophomonas sp. strain EMS isolated from lake Taihu, China. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 11:896–911CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ciancio A, Mukerji KG (eds) (2008) Integrated management of diseases caused by fungi, phytoplasma and bacteria (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clément C, Barka EA (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71:4951–4959CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook RJ, Thomashow LS, Weller DM, Fujimoto D, Mazzola M, Bangera G, Kim DS (1995) Molecular mechanisms of defense by rhizobacteria against root disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 92:4197–4201Google Scholar
  6. Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK (1996) Phytophthora diseases worldwide. APS Press, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  7. Fani SR, Zamanizadeh HR, Mirabolfathy M (2006) Isolation and identification of the causal agents of root and crown rot of pistachio trees in the Sistan and Baluchistan province. Acta Horticulturae 726:647–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. European Journal of Plant Pathology 119:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haas D, Défago G (2005) Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nature Reviews Microbiology 3:307–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Handelsman J, Raffel S, Mester EH, Wunderlich L, Grau CR (1990) Biological control of damping-off of alfalfa seedlings with Bacillus cereus UW85. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56:713–718PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hora TS, Baker R (1972) Soil fungistasis: microflora producing a volatile inhibitor. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 59:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu L, Wang D, Liu L, Chen J, Xue Y, Shi Z (2013) Ca2+ efflux is involved in cinnamaldehyde-induced growth inhibition of Phytophthora capsici. PLoS One 8:e76264CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Kloepper JW, Lifshitz R, Zablotowicz RM (1989) Free-living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity. Trends in Biotechnology 7:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee JY, Kim BS, Lim SW, Lee BK, Kim CH, Hwang BK (1999) Field control of Phytophthora blight of pepper plant with antagonistic rhizobacteria and DL-β-Amino-n-Butyric acid. Plant Pathology Journal 15:217–222Google Scholar
  15. Lee KJ, Kamala-Kannan S, Sub HS, Seong CK, Lee GW (2008) Biological control of Phytophthora blight in red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) using Bacillus subtilis. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 24:1139–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee BD, Dutta S, Ryu H, Yoo SJ, Suh DS, Park K (2015) Induction of systemic resistance in Panax ginseng against Phytophthora cactorum by native Bacillus amyloliquefaciens HK34. Journal of Ginseng Research 39:213–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Leelasuphakul W, Hemmanee P, Chuenchitt S (2008) Growth inhibitory properties of Bacillus subtilis strains and their metabolites against the green mold pathogen (Penicillium digitatum Sacc.) of citrus fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 48:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li Y, Ying Y, Ding W (2014) Dynamics of Panax ginseng rhizospheric soil microbial community and their metabolic function. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014:1–7Google Scholar
  19. Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology 63:541–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahajan S, Tuteja N (2005) Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 444:139–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Masago H, Yoshikawa M, Fukada M, Nakanishi N (1977) Selective inhibition of Pythium spp. on a medium for direct isolation of Phytophthora spp. from soils and plants. Phytopathology 67:425–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mirabolfathy M, Cooke DE, Duncan JM, Williams NA, Ershad D, Alizadeh A (2001) Phytophthora pistaciae sp. nov. and P. melonis: the principal causes of pistachio gummosis in Iran. Mycological Research 105:1166–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moradi M, Mohammadi AH, Haghdel M (2017) Efficiency of elite fungicides for control of pistachio gummosis. Journal of Nuts 8:11–20Google Scholar
  24. Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa R, Cooke DEL, Banihashemi Z (2008) Phytophthora parsiana sp. nov., a new high-temperature tolerant species. Mycological Research 112:783–794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Praveen Kumar G, Mir Hassan Ahmed SK, Desai S, Leo Daniel Amalraj E, Rasul A (2014) In vitro screening for abiotic stress tolerance in potent biocontrol and plant growth promoting strains of Pseudomonas and Bacillus spp. International Journal of Bacteriology 2014:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raaijmakers JM, Mazzola M (2012) Diversity and natural functions of antibiotics produced by beneficial and plant pathogenic bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology 50:403–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Raaijmakers JM, Vlami M, De Souza JT (2002) Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 81:537–547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Raaijmakers JM, De Bruijn I, Nybroe O, Ongena M (2010) Natural functions of lipopeptides from Bacillus and Pseudomonas: more than surfactants and antibiotics. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 34:1037–1062CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sadeghy B, Salari M, Shahidi Bonjar GH, Panjekeh N, Aminnaee M (2014) A preliminary study of biological control of citrus gummosis by soil-borne Streptomyces sp. isolates in vitro condition. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 47:774–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaad NW, Jones JB, Chun W (2001) Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria, 3rd edn. APS Press, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  31. Shahidi Bonjar GH, Barkhordar B, Pakgohar N, Aghighi S, Biglary S, Rashid Farrokhi P, Aghelizadeh A (2006) Biological control of Phytophthora drechsleri Tucker, the causal agent of pistachio gummosis, under greenhouse conditions by use of actinomycetes. Plant Pathology Journal 5:20–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Veena SS, Anandaraj M, Sarma YR (2010) Variability in the sensitivity of Phytophthora capsici isolates to potassium phosphonate. Indian Phytopathology 63:71Google Scholar
  33. Zhang Y, Du BH, Jin ZG, Li ZH, Song HN, Ding YQ (2011) Analysis of bacterial communities in rhizosphere soil of healthy and diseased cotton (Gossypium sp.) at different plant growth stages. Plant and Soil 339:447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Moradi
    • 1
  • Fatemeh Jafari Nejad
    • 2
  • Gholam Hosein Shahidi Bonjar
    • 2
  • Seyed Reza Fani
    • 3
  • Badrosadat Mahmudi Mimand
    • 1
  • Claudia Probst
    • 4
  • Mehrdad Madani
    • 5
  1. 1.Pistachio Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)RafsanjanIran
  2. 2.Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of AgricultureShahid Bahonar University of KermanKermanIran
  3. 3.Plant Protection Research DepartmentYazd Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO)YazdIran
  4. 4.Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension CenterWashington State UniversityProsserUSA
  5. 5.Department of Soil Science, College of AgricultureUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations