Audio-Visual Interactions and the Influence of Colour on Noise Annoyance Evaluations

Abstract

This study aims to examine the influence of colour exposure on noise annoyance. Previous studies in the literature have focused mostly on the effects of colour exposure on loudness judgements; however, due to the cognitive nature of multisensory perception, the influence of colour on noise annoyance also needs to be investigated. Our experiments were designed to administer non-information-carrying sound signals (i.e. white noise) and visual stimuli (i.e. abstract colour samples) and to limit visual and auditory contextual information. Participants were asked to evaluate noise annoyance on an 11-point International Commission on Biological Effects of Noise (ICBEN) scale. The experiments were conducted in the form of audio-visual tests. During these tests, random combinations of three white noise sound samples with sound pressure levels of 66 dB(A) (−4 dB[A] acoustic condition), 70 dB(A) (0 dB[A] acoustic condition) and 74 dB(A) (+4 dB[A] acoustic condition), and six visual stimuli, including the elementary colours of the Natural Colour System (NCS)—yellow (Y), red (R), blue (B), green (G), white (W) and black (S)—were presented to a total of 42 participants. The black colour sample was used to measure the audio-only control condition for the three white noise sound samples. The results of the study reveal that the effects of sound, the effects of colour and the interaction effects of colour and sound on perceived noise annoyance were statistically significant. The effects of colour on the loudness evaluations of the previous studies and the effects of colour on noise annoyance evaluations presented in this study show very similar and concordant results, indicating that the effects of colour on noise annoyance depend on the sound pressure level (SPL). The results indicate that the hue contrasts of red–green, red–blue and yellow–blue and the lightness contrast of yellow–blue influenced perceived noise annoyance when the SPL was low or high. Within the contrast pairs, red and yellow were perceived to be annoying, whereas blue and green were perceived to be non-annoying.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Spence, C., Zampini, M.: Auditory contributions to multisensory product perception. Acta Acust. United Acust. 92, 1009–1025 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Driver, J., Noesselt, T.: Multisensory interplay reveals crossmodal influences on ‘sensory-specific’ brain regions, neural responses, and judgments. Neuron 57, 11–23 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Till, J.: The vanity of form. J. Archit. 4(1), 47–54. (1999)

  4. 4.

    Szychowska, M., Hafke-Dys, H., Preis, A., Kociński, J., Kleka, P.: The influence of audio-visual interactions on the annoyance ratings for wind turbines. Appl. Acoust. 129, 190–203 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Haverkamp, M.: Synesthetic design: handbook for a multisensory approach. Birkhauser, Basel (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Shipley, T.: Auditory flutter-driving of visual flicker. Science (1964). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.145.3638.1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., Shimojo, S.: What you see is what you hear. Nature 408, 788 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Stein, B.E.: The new handbook of multisensory processes. In: The New Handbook of Multisensory Processes (2011)

  9. 9.

    Long, M.: Architectural acoustics. Elsevier Inc., Burlington (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Guski, R., Felscher-Suhr, U., Schuemer, R.: The concept of noise annoyance: How international experts see it. J. Sound Vib. 223, 513–527 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/JSVI.1998.2173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Preis, A., Kociński, J.J., Hafke-Dys, H., Wrzosek, M.: Audio-visual interactions in environment assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 523, 191–200 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Blauert, J., Jekosch, U.: Sound-quality evaluation—A multi-layered problem. Acta Acust. united with Acust. 85(5), 747–753 (1997)

  13. 13.

    Brown, A.L.: Soundscapes and environmental noise management. Noise Control Eng. J. (2010). https://doi.org/10.3397/1.3484178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Benfield, J.A., Bell, P.A., Troup, L.J., Soderstrom, N.C.: Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment. J. Environ. Psychol. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Pedersen, E., Larsman, P.: The impact of visual factors on noise annoyance among people living in the vicinity of wind turbines. J. Environ. Psychol. 28, 379–389 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Liu, J., Kang, J., Behm, H., Luo, T.: Effects of landscape on soundscape perception: Soundwalks in city parks. Landsc. Urban Plan. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Haverkamp, M.: Advanced description of noise perception by analysis of cross-sensory interactions within soundscapes. Noise Control Eng. J. 58, 540 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3397/1.3484176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yu, T., Behm, H., Bill, R., Kang, J.: Audio-visual perception of new wind parks. Landsc. Urban Plan. 165, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rader, T., Morigana, M., Matsui, T., Fastl, H., Kuwano, S., Namba, S.: Crosscultural effects in audio-visual interactions. Trans. Tech. Comm. Noise Vib. Acoust. Soc, Japan (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Abe, K., Ozawa, K., Suzuki, Y., Sone, T.: Comparison of the effects of verbal versus visual information about sound sources on the perception of environmental sounds. Acta Acust. United Acust. 92(1), 51–60 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Haapakangas, A., Hongisto, V., Oliva, D.: Audio-visual interaction in perception of industrial plants—effects of sound level and the degree of visual masking by vegetation. Appl. Acoust. 160, 107121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Feisner, E.A.: Colour: How to use colour in art and design. Laurence King Publishing, UK (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sun, X., Li, X., Ji, L., Han, F., Wang, H., Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Lou, Z., Li, Z.: An extended research of crossmodal correspondence between color and sound in psychology and cognitive ergonomics. PeerJ. 6, e4443 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Caivano, J.L.: Color and sound: physical and psychophysical relations. Color Res. Appl. (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-6378.1994.tb00072.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hagtvedt, H., Brasel, S.A.: Cross-modal communication: sound frequency influences consumer responses to color lightness. J. Mark. Res. 53, 551–562 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hamilton-Fletcher, G., Witzel, C., Reby, D., Ward, J.: Sound properties associated with equiluminant colours. Multisens. Res. 30, 337–362 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fastl, H.: Audio-visual interactions in loudness evaluation. In: Proc. 18th Int. Congress on Acoustics (2004)

  28. 28.

    Menzel, D., Fastl, H., Graf, R., Hellbrück, J.: Influence of vehicle color on loudness judgments. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 2477–2479 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2890747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Patsouras, C., Filippou, T.G., Fastl, H.: Influences of color on the loudness judgement. In: Proceedings of Forum Acusticum. pp. 1–6 (2002)

  30. 30.

    Fucci, D., Petrosino, L., Banks, M.: Effects of gender and listeners’ preference on magnitude-estimation scaling of rock music. Percept. Mot. Skills. 78, 1235–1242 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.78.3c.1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yu, L., Kang, J.: Effects of social, demographical and behavioral factors on the sound level evaluation in urban open spaces. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 772–783 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2821955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Beheshti, M.H., Taban, E., Samaei, S.E., Faridan, M., Khajehnasiri, F., Khaveh, L.T., Jebeli, M.B., Mehri, A., Tajpoor, A.: The influence of personality traits and gender on noise annoyance in laboratory studies. Pers. Individ. Dif. 148, 95–100 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Fastl, H., Zwicker, E.: Psychoacoustics. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dornic, S., Laaksonen, T.: Continuous noise, intermittent noise, and annoyance. Percept. Mot. Skills. 68, 11–18 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1989.68.1.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zimmer, K., Ghani, J., Ellermeier, W.: The role of task interference and exposure duration in judging noise annoyance. J. Sound Vib. 311, 1039–1051 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hiramatsu, K., Takagi, K., Yamamoto, T., Ikeno, J.: The effect of sound duration on annoyance. J. Sound Vib. 59, 511–520 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(78)80131-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Seki, K., Kaneko, T., Goto, K., Yano, T.: Choice of japanese modifiers in noise annoyance scale during exposures to white noise. J. Sound Vib. 277, 603–608 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    AudioCheck: Online audiogram hearing test, https://www.audiocheck.net/testtones_hearingtestaudiogram.php

  39. 39.

    ANSI/ASA S3.6: Specification for audiometers. (2018)

  40. 40.

    Fairchild, M.D., Reniff, L.: Time course of chromatic adaptation for color-appearance judgments. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 12, 824 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.12.000824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Katoh, N., Nakabayashi, K., Ito, M., Ohno, S.: Effect of ambient light on the color appearance of softcopy images: Mixed chromatic adaptation for self-luminous displays. J. Electron. Imaging. 7, 794 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.482665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    DiLaura, D.L., Houser, K.W., Mistrick, R.G., Steffy, G.R.: The lighting handbook. (2011)

  43. 43.

    Fields, J.M., De Jong, R.G., Gjestland, T., Flindell, I.H., Job, R.F.S., Kurra, S., Lercher, P., Vallet, M., Yano, T., Guski, R., Felscher-Suhr, U., Schumer, R.: Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: Research and a recommendation. J. Sound Vib. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.3384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ralph, O.S.G., Kister Kaiser, M.: MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs An extensive primer. Psychol. Bull 97, 316–333 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Field, A.: Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE publications LTD, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pallant, J.: SPSS survival manual, 3rd. Ed. McGrath Hill. (2007)

  47. 47.

    Skagerstrand, Å., Köbler, S., Stenfelt, S.: Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds–perception by normal hearing subjects. Int. J. Audiol. 56, 775–783 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2017.1321790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Berglund, B., Preis, A., Rankin, K.: Relationship between loudness and annoyance for ten community sounds. Environ. Int. 16, 523–531 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(90)90021-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Holtzschue, L.: Understanding Color: An Introduction for Designers. Wiley, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rizzi, A., Bonanomi, C.: The human visual system described through visual illusions. In: Best, J. (ed.) Colour Design: Theories and Applications. pp. 23–41. Elsevier LTD, Duxford (2017)

  51. 51.

    Hård, A., Sivik, L., Tonnquist, G.: NCS, natural color system-from concept to research and applications. Part II. Color Res. Appl. 21, 206–220 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6378(199606)21:3%3c206::AID-COL3%3e3.0.CO;2-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hård, A.: Qualitative attributes of colour perception. In: 1st International Colour Association Congress. , Stockholm (1969)

  53. 53.

    Valberg, A.: Unique hues: An old problem for a new generation. Vision Res. 41, 1645–1657 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00041-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Taft, C.: Generality Aspects of Color Naming and Color meaning, (1997)

  55. 55.

    Setchell, J.S.: Colour description and communication. In: Applications, J Best. pp. 99–129. Elsevier LTD, Duxford (2017)

  56. 56.

    Lotto, R.B., Purves, D.: The empirical basis of color perception. Conscious. Cogn. 11, 609–629 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the undergraduate and graduate students of the Faculty of Architecture, Çankaya University, who voluntarily participated in this study.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kivanc Kitapci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

This research was approved on behalf of Çankaya University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee (Research No: 107).

Informed consent

Verbal informed consent was obtained prior to the experiments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitapci, K., Akbay, S. Audio-Visual Interactions and the Influence of Colour on Noise Annoyance Evaluations. Acoust Aust (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-021-00220-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Audio-visual interactions
  • Noise annoyance
  • Colour perception
  • Colour and sound interactions