Acoustics Australia

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 159–178 | Cite as

A Tale of Two Soundscapes: Comparing the Acoustic Characteristics of Urban Versus Pristine Coastal Dolphin Habitats in Western Australia

  • S. A. MarleyEmail author
  • C. P. Salgado Kent
  • C. Erbe
  • D. Thiele
Original Paper


Underwater noise environments are increasingly being considered in marine spatial planning and habitat quality assessments. Although the overall aim of regulation is to quieten anthropogenically noise-rich habitats whilst maintaining pristine habitats free of man-made noise, effective management plans require knowledge upon which to base decisions. This is particularly true for managers of acoustically specialised species. This study aimed to compare the acoustic environment of coastal dolphins in two locations within Western Australia by comparing a ‘pristine’ habitat (Roebuck Bay) with an ‘urban’ habitat (Fremantle Inner Harbour). Autonomous underwater acoustic recorders collected approximately 940 and 1080 h of data from these two sites, respectively. Additionally, in Roebuck Bay opportunistic in situ recordings with concurrent visual observations were collected in the presence of two dolphin species. Acoustic data were assessed via weekly spectrograms, power spectrum density percentile plots and probability densities, octave band levels, broadband noise levels, and generalised estimating equations. Results indicated that the two sites had highly contrasting acoustic environments. In Roebuck Bay, the local soundscape was dominated by biotic sounds, with only sporadic vessel noise. However, in Fremantle Inner Harbour, anthropogenic noise was prevalent. On average, Roebuck Bay was 20 dB quieter than the Fremantle Inner Harbour over the frequency band 10 Hz–11 kHz. Dolphin communications had a greater potential to be masked in Fremantle Inner Harbour than in Roebuck Bay based on elevated anthropogenic noise levels. If noise levels were to increase in Roebuck Bay, coastal dolphins may show behavioural and/or acoustical responses as observed at other locations.


Underwater soundscape Spatio-temporal variation Anthropogenic noise Bottlenose dolphins Snubfin dolphins 



The authors would like to thank contributors to fieldwork and logistics included: Cameron Birch, Phil Bouchet, Leila Fouda, Sven Gastauer, Johani Mamid, Jamie McWilliam, Julie Melbourne, Dave Minchin, Toby Munro, Miles Parsons, Malcolm Perry, Daniel Pethick, Nick Riddoch, Josh Smith and Cornell Tolentino. We are also indebted to Jason Fowler, EnvironsKimberley, Department of Parks and Wildlife, Broome Port Authority, and the Fremantle Port Authority for their assistance and support of this project. Funding was provided by the Western Australian Marine Science Institution, the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment (Equity Trustees Charitable Foundation & Ecological Society of Australia) and the Australian Acoustical Society. Finally, we would like to extend our thanks to the two reviewers whose helpful feedback considerably strengthened this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Tyack, P.L., Miller, E.H.: Vocal anatomy, acoustic communication and echolocation. In: Marine Mammal Biology: An evolutionary approach. pp. 142–184 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nowacek, D.P., Thorne, L.H., Johnston, D.W., Tyack, P.L.: Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise. Mamm. Rev. 37, 81–115 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Research Council, N.R.C.: Marine Mammal Populations and Ocean Noise. National Academies Press, Washington (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Research Council, N.R.C.: Ocean Noise and Marine Mammals. National Academies Press, Washington (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richardson, W.J., Greene, C.R., Malme, C.I., Thomson, D.H.: Marine Mammals and Noise. Academic Press, San Diego (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weilgart, L.S.: The impacts of anthropogenic ocean noise on cetaceans and implications for management. Can. J. Zool. 85, 1091–1116 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams, R., Wright, A.J., Ashe, E., Blight, L.K., Bruintjes, R., Canessa, R., Clark, C.W., Cullis-Suzuki, S., Dakin, D.T., Erbe, C., Hammond, P.S., Merchant, N.D., O’Hara, P.D., Purser, J., Radford, A.N., Simpson, S.D., Thomas, L., Wale, M.A.: Impacts of anthropogenic noise on marine life: publication patterns, new discoveries, and future directions in research and management. Ocean Coast. Manag. 115, 17–24 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams, R., Ashe, E., Blight, L., Jasny, M., Nowlan, L.: Marine mammals and ocean noise: future directions and information needs with respect to science, policy and law in Canada. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 86, 29–38 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erbe, C., Reichmuth, C., Cunningham, K., Lucke, K., Dooling, R.: Communication masking in marine mammals: a review and research strategy. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 103, 15–38 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Southall, B.L., Bowles, A.E., Ellison, W.T., Finneran, J.J., Gentry, R.L., Greene Jr., C.R., Kastak, D., Ketten, D.R., Miller, J.H., Nachtigall, P.E., Richardson, W.J., Thomas, J.A., Tyack, P.L.: Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: initial scientific recommendation. Aquat. Mamm. 33, 411–521 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erbe, C.: The effects of underwater noise on marine mammals. In: Popper, A., Hawkins, A.D. (eds.) The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life, pp. 17–22. Springer, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Erbe, C., MacGillivray, A., Williams, R.: Mapping cumulative noise from shipping to inform marine spatial planning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, EL423 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark, C.W., Ellison, W.T., Southall, B.L., Hatch, L., Van Parijs, S.M., Frankel, A., Ponirakis, D.: Acoustic masking in marine ecosystems: intuitions, analysis, and implication. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 395, 201–222 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Erbe, C., Williams, R., Sandilands, D., Ashe, E.: Identifying modeled ship noise hotspots for marine mammals of Canada’s pacific region. PLoS ONE. 9, e89820 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams, R., Erbe, C., Ashe, E., Clark, C.W.: Quiet(er) marine protected areas. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 100, 154–161 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Society for Marine Mammalogy, S.M.M.: List of marine mammal species and subspecies (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ross, G.J.B.: Review of the conservation status of Australia’s smaller whales and dolphins. Report to the Australian Government (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marley, S.A., Erbe, C., Salgado-Kent, C.P., Parsons, M.J.G., Parnum, I.M.: Spatial and temporal variation in the acoustic habitat of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) within a highly urbanised estuary. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 197 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marley, S.A., Salgado Kent, C.P., Erbe, C.: Occupancy of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in relation to vessel traffic, dredging and environmental variables within a highly-urbanised estuary. Hydrobiologia 792, 243–263 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marley, S.A., Erbe, C., Salgado-Kent, C.P.: Underwater sound in an urban estuarine river: sound sources, soundscape contribution, and temporal variability. Acoust. Aust. 44, 171–186 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salgado Kent, C., McCauley, R.D., Parnum, I.M., Gavrilov, A.N.: Underwater noise sources in Fremantle Inner Harbour: dolphins, pile driving and traffic. In: Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of Australia; p. Fremantle, Western Australia; 21–23 November (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chabanne, D., Finn, H., Salgado-Kent, C., Bedjer, L.: Identification of a resident community of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in the Swan Canning Riverpark, Western Australia, using behavioural information. Pacific Conserv. Biol. 18, 247–262 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Swan River Trust, S.R.T.: Dolphin Watch Annual Report (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marley, S.A., Salgado-Kent, C.P., Erbe, C., Parnum, I.M.: Effects of vessel traffic and underwater noise on the movement, behaviour and vocalisations of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in a highly urbanised estuary. Sci. Rep. (2017, in press)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Strickland-Munro, J., Kobryn, H., Moore, S.A., Brown, G.: Valuing the wild, remote and beautiful: using public participation gis to inform tourism planning in the Kimberley, Western Australia. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 11, 355–364 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shire of Broome: Strategic Community Plan 2013–2023 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brown, A.M., Bejder, L., Pollock, K.H., Allen, S.J.: Site-specific assessments of the abundance of three inshore dolphin species to inform regional conservation and management. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 4 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thiele, D.: Collision Course: Snubfin dolphin injuries in Roebuck Bay. In: Report to World Wildl. Fund-Australia 15 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cagnazzi, D., Parra, G.J., Westley, S., Harrison, P.L.: At the heart of the industrial boom: Australian snubfin dolphins in the Capricorn Coast, Queensland, need urgent conservation action. PLoS ONE 8, e56729 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jefferson, T.A., Hung, S.K., Würsig, B.: Protecting small cetaceans from coastal development: impact assessment and mitigation experience in Hong Kong. Mar. Policy 33, 305–311 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parra, G.J., Corkeron, P.J., Marsh, H.: Population sizes, site fidelity and residence patterns of Australian snubfin and Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins: implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 129, 167–180 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brill, R.L., Moore, P.W.B., Dankiewicz, La: Assessment of dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) auditory sensitivity and hearing loss using jawphones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1717 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hawkins, E.R.: Geographic variations in the whistles of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) along the east and west coasts of Australia. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 924–935 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Houser, D.S., Finneran, J.J.: Variation in the hearing sensitivity of a dolphin population determined through the use of evoked potential audiometry. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 4090–4099 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Houser, D.S., Gomez-Rubio, A., Finneran, J.J.: Evoked potential audiometry of 13 Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus gilli). Mar. Mamm. Sci. 24, 28–41 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mooney, T.A., Yamato, M., Branstetter, B.K.: Hearing in Cetaceans: from natural history to experimental biology. Adv. Mar. Biol. 63, 197–246 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Popov, V.V., Supin, A.Y., Pletenko, M.G., Tarakanov, M.B., Klishin, V.O., Bulgakova, T.N., Rosanova, E.I.: Audiogram variability in normal bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Aquat. Mamm. 33, 24–33 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ward, R., Parnum, I., Erbe, C., Salgado-Kent, C.: Whistle characteristics of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in the fremantle inner harbour. Western Australia. Acoust. Aust. 44, 159–169 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Caldwell, M.C., Caldwell, D.K., Tyack, P.L.: Review of the signature whistle hypothesis for the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin. In: Leatherwood, S., Reeves, R.R. (eds.) The Bottlenose Dolphin, pp. 199–234. Academic, New York (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Janik, V.M., Sayigh, L.S., Wells, R.S.: Signature whistle shape conveys identity information to bottlenose dolphins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8293–7 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Janik, V.M., Slater, P.J.B.: Context-specific use suggests that bottlenose dolphin signature whistles are cohesion calls. Anim. Behav. 56, 829–838 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jensen, F.H., Beedholm, K., Wahlberg, M., Bejder, L., Madsen, P.T.: Estimated communication range and energetic cost of bottlenose dolphin whistles in a tropical habitat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 582–592 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ding, W., Wursig, B., Evans, W.: Whistles of bottlenose dolphins: comparisons among populations. Aquat. Mamm. 21, 65–77 (1995)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Berg Soto, A., Marsh, H., Everingham, Y., Smith, J.N., Parra, G.J., Noad, M.: Discriminating between the vocalizations of Indo-Pacific humpback and Australian snubfin dolphins in Queensland. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136, 930 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Parijs, S.M.Van, Parra, G.J., Corkeron, P.J.: Sounds produced by Australian Irrawaddy dolphins. Orcaella brevirostris. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1938–1940 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Moiler, K.: Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.)—a study of patterns in spatial and temporal use of the Swan River, Western Australia Honours Thesis, Curtin University (2008)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gavrilov, A.N., Parsons, M.J.G.: A matlab tool for the characterisation of recorded underwater sound (CHORUS). Acoust. Aust. 42, 190–196 (2014)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bailey, H., Corkrey, R., Cheney, B., Thompson, P.M.: Analyzing temporally correlated dolphin sightings data using generalized estimating equations. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 29, 123–141 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zuur, A., Ieno, E.N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A.A., Smith, G.S.: Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, Berlin (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bailey, H., Mate, B.R., Palacios, D.M., Irvine, L., Bograd, S.J., Costa, D.P.: Behavioural estimation of blue whale movements in the Northeast Pacific from state-space model analysis of satellite tracks. Endanger. Species Res. 10, 93–106 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bailey, H., Thompson, P.M.: Effect of oceanographic features on fine-scale foraging movements of bottlenose dolphins. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 418, 223–233 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    De Boer, M.N., Simmonds, M.P., Reijnders, P.J.H., Aarts, G.: The influence of topographic and dynamic cyclic variables on the distribution of small cetaceans in a shallow coastal system. PLoS ONE 9, e86331 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Griffin, R.B., Griffin, N.J.: Distribution, habitat partitioning, and abundance of Atlantic spotted dolphins, bottlenose dolphins, and loggerhead sea turtles on the eastern Gulf of Mexico continental shelf. Gulf Mex. Sci. 21, 23–34 (2003)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pirotta, E., Laesser, B.E., Hardaker, A., Riddoch, N., Marcoux, M., Lusseau, D.: Dredging displaces bottlenose dolphins from an urbanised foraging patch. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 74, 396–402 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Photopoulou, T., Best, P., Hammond, P., Findlay, K.: Movement patterns of coastal bottlenose dolphins in the presence of a fast-flowing, prevailing current: shore-based observations at Cape Vidal, South Africa. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 33, 393–401 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Elphick, C.S.: A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pan, W.: Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics 57, 120–125 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    R Core Team, L.: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2015)
  59. 59.
    Højsgaard, S., Halekoh, U., Yan, J.: The R package geepack for Generalized Estimating Equations. J. Stat. Softw. 15, 1–11 (2006)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yan, J.: geepack: Yet another package for Generalized Estimating Equations. R-news 2, 12–14 (2002)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Yan, J., Fine, J.P.: Estimating equations for association structures. Stat. Med. 23, 859–880 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ekstrom, C.: MESS: Miscellaneous Esoteric Statistical Scripts. R package (2014)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Scott-Hayward, L.A., Oedekoven, C.S., MacKenzie, M.L., Rexstad, E., Walker, C.: MRSea package (version 0.0.1): statistical modelling of bird and cetacean distributions in offshore renewables development areas (2014)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Salgado Kent, C., Smith, J., Thiele, D., Marley, S.A., Erbe, C., McCauley, R., Bejder, L.: Relative abundance, population genetic structure and acoustic monitoring of Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins in regions within the Kimberley. In: Mileston Report I: Passive Acoustic Monitoring of Australian Snubfin and Humpback Dolphins in Roebuck Bay., Perth, Western Australia (2015)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Marley, S.A., Erbe, C., Salgado-Kent, C.P.: Underwater recordings of the whistles of bottlenose dolphins in Fremantle Inner Harbour. Western Australia. Sci. Data (2017, in press)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Merchant, N.D., Barton, T.R., Thompson, P.M., Pirotta, E., Dakin, D.T., Dorocicz, J.: Spectral probability density as a tool for ambient noise analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, EL262–7 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Erbe, C., Liong, S., Koessler, M.W., Duncan, A.J., Gourlay, T.: Underwater sound of rigid-hulled inflatable boats. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Expr. Lett. 139, 223–227 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Holt, M.M., Noren, D.P., Dunkin, R.C., Williams, T.M.: Vocal performance affects metabolic rate in dolphins: implications for animals communicating in noisy environments. J. Exp. Biol. 2, 1–8 (2015)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Holt, M.M., Noren, D.P., Dunkin, R.C., Williams, T.M.: Comparing the metabolic costs of different sound types in bottlenose dolphins. Proc. Meet. Acoust. 27, 10019 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Noren, D.P., Holt, M.M., Dunkin, R.C., Williams, T.M.: The metabolic cost of communicative sound production in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J. Exp. Biol. 216, 1624–1629 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Bejder, L., Samuels, A., Whitehead, H., Gales, N., Mann, J., Connor, R., Heithaus, M., Watson-Capps, J., Flaherty, C., Krutzen, M.: Decline in relative abundance of bottlenose dolphins exposed to long-term disturbance. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1791–1798 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lusseau, D.: Residency pattern of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops spp. in Milford Sound, New Zealand, is related to boat traffic. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 295, 265–272 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pérez-Jorge, S., Gomes, I., Hayes, K., Corti, G., Louzao, M., Genovart, M., Oro, D.: Effects of nature-based tourism and environmental drivers on the demography of a small dolphin population. Biol. Conserv. 197, 200–208 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Rako, N., Fortuna, C.M., Holcer, D., Mackelworth, P., Nimak-Wood, M., Pleslić, G., Sebastianutto, L., Vilibić, I., Wiemann, A., Picciulin, M.: Leisure boating noise as a trigger for the displacement of the bottlenose dolphins of the Cres-Losinj archipelago (northern Adriatic Sea, Croatia). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 68, 77–84 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Au, D., Perryman, W.: Movement and speed of dolphin schools responding to an approaching ship. Fish. Bull. 80, 371–379 (1982)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Buckstaff, K.: Effects of watercraft noise on the acoustic behavior of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops Truncatus, in Sarasota Bay. Florida. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 20, 709–725 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Stensland, E., Berggren, P.: Behavioural changes in female Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins in response to boat-based tourism. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 332, 225–234 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Constantine, R., Brunton, D.H., Dennis, T.: Dolphin-watching tour boats change bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) behaviour. Biol. Conserv. 117, 299–307 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Guerra, M., Dawson, S.M., Brough, T.E., Rayment, W.J.: Effects of boats on the surface and acoustic behaviour of an endangered population of bottlenose dolphins. Endanger. Species Res. 24, 221–236 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Heiler, J., Elwen, S.H., Kriesell, H.J., Gridley, T.: Changes in bottlenose dolphin whistle parameters related to vessel presence, surface behaviour and group composition. Anim. Behav. 117, 167–177 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lemon, M., Lynch, T.P., Cato, D.H., Harcourt, R.G.: Response of travelling bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) to experimental approaches by a powerboat in Jervis Bay, New South Wales. Australia. Biol. Conserv. 127, 363–372 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Lusseau, D.: Effects of tour boats on the behavior of bottlenose dolphins: using Markov chains to model anthropogenic impacts. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1785–1793 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Lusseau, D.: The short-term behavioral reactions of bottlenose dolphins to interactions with boats in doubtful sound. New Zealand. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 22, 802–818 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Mattson, M.C., Thomas, J., St. Aubin, D.: Effects of boat activity on the behavior of bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in waters surrounding Hilton Head Island, South Carolina. Aquat. Mamm. 31, 133–140 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Nowacek, S.M., Wells, R.S., Solow, A.R.: Short-term effects of boat traffic on bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Sarasota Bay. Florida. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 17, 673–688 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Bazúa-Durán, C., Au, W.W.L.: Geographic variations in the whistles of spinner dolphins (Stenella longirostris) of the Main Hawai’ian Islands. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 3757–3769 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Morisaka, T., Shinohara, M., Nakahara, F., Akamatsu, T.: Geographic variations in the whistles among three Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin Tursiops aduncus populations in Japan. Fish. Sci. 71, 568–576 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rossi-santos, M.R., Podos, J.: Latitudinal variation in whistle structure of the estuarine dolphin Sotalia guianensis. Behaviour 143, 347–364 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Azzolin, M., Papale, E., Lammers, M.O., Gannier, A., Giacoma, C.: Geographic variation of whistles of the striped dolphin ({Stenella} coeruleoalba) within the Mediterranean {Sea}. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 694–705 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    May-Collado, L.J., Wartzok, D.: A comparison of Bottlenose Dolphin whistles in the Atlantic Ocean: factors promoting whistle variation. J. Mamm. 89, 1229–1240 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Azar, J.F., Bell, B.D.: Acoustic features within a forest bird community of native and introduced species in New Zealand. Emu 116, 22–31 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Both, C., Grant, T.: Biological invasions and the acoustic niche: the effect of bullfrog calls on the acoustic signals of white-banded tree frogs. Biol. Lett. 8, 714–716 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Pijanowski, B.C., Villanueva-Rivera, L.J., Dumyahn, S.L., Farina, A., Krause, B.L., Napoletano, B.M., Gage, S.H., Pieretti, N.: Soundscape ecology: the science of sound in the landscape. Bioscience 61, 203–216 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Sinsch, U., Lümkemann, K., Rosar, K., Dehling, J.M., Schwarz, C.: Acoustic niche partitioning in an anuran community inhabiting an afromontane wetland (Butare, Rwanda). Afr. Zool. 47, 60–73 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Tennessen, J.B., Parks, S.E., Tennessen, T.P., Langkilde, T.: Raising a racket: invasive species compete acoustically with native treefrogs. Anim. Behav. 114, 53–61 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Kyhn, L.A., Tougaard, J., Beedholm, K., Jensen, F.H., Ashe, E., Williams, R., Madsen, P.T.: Clicking in a Killer Whale Habitat: narrow-band, high-frequency biosonar clicks of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and Dall’s Porpoise (Phocoenoides dalli). PLoS ONE. 8 (2013)Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Miksis-Olds, J.L.: Comparison of soundscapes across the Bering Sea shelf, a biological perspective. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 4147 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Mossbridge, J., Thomas, J.: An “acoustic niche” for Antarctic killer whale and leopard seal sounds. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 15, 1351–1357 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Van Opzeeland, I., Van Parijs, S., Bornemann, H., Frickenhaus, S., Kindermann, L., Klinck, H., Plötz, J., Boebel, O.: Acoustic ecology of antarctic pinnipeds. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 414, 267–291 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Hernandez, E.N., Solangi, M., Kuczaj, S.: Time and frequency parameters of bottlenose dolphin whistles as predictors of surface behavior in the Mississippi Sound. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 3232–3238 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Díaz López, B.: Whistle characteristics in free-ranging bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Mediterranean Sea: influence of behaviour. Mamm. Biol. 76, 180–189 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Jones, G.J., Sayigh, L.S.: Geographic variation in rates of vocal production of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 18, 374–393 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Quick, N.J., Janik, V.M.: Whistle rates of wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): influences of group size and behaviour. J. Comp. Psychol. 122, 305–311 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Acevedo-Gutiérrez, A., Stienessen, S.C.: Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) increase number of whistles when feeding. Aquat. Mamm. 30, 357–362 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Shane, S.H., Wells, R.S., Würsig, B.: Ecology, behavior and social organization of the Bottlenose dolphin: a review. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2, 34–63 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Acoustical Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Marine Science and Technology (CMST)Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations