Acoustics Australia

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 87–93 | Cite as

Fitness Instructors and Noise Exposure: Spreading the Hearing Health Message

  • Valerie NieEmail author
  • Elizabeth Beach
Technical Note


This study investigated self-reported indicators of noise exposure, symptoms of hearing loss and awareness of hearing problems in 76 Australian fitness instructors working in the Newcastle area (NSW) 1997–1998 and Sydney in 2009–2011. Nineteen Newcastle instructors also submitted for audiometry. Instructors spent an average of 11.5 h/week in fitness classes, 30.3 % did other paid work involving noise exposure for all or most of the time and for an average of 25 h/week and 72.4 % attended music entertainment venues for an average of 4 h/week. The loudness categories and previously recorded noise levels were used to estimate Pascal-squared hours of noise exposure, and instructors were classified into low- and high-exposure groups. 64 % of instructors reported experiencing at least one of the symptoms of tinnitus, temporary hearing loss, dizziness, or the need to turn up the volume on the radio and there was a non-significant correlation between the occurrence of symptoms and noise exposure. More instructors reported no symptoms in the low- compared with the high-exposure group. Audiogram hearing thresholds were compared against the 10th percentile of gender- and age-matched normal subjects. 68.8 % of audiograms revealed an elevated threshold in at least one ear and 37.5 % showed an auditory notch at 6000 Hz. Overall the findings showed that more than half of fitness instructors had signs or symptoms of hearing loss and were potentially exposed to excess noise. It is important to communicate the risks of loud music in fitness classes and partner with media outlets to publicise research findings and raise awareness amongst those at risk.


Noise Noise-induced hearing loss Hearing Audiogram Fitness 


Compliance with ethical standards

Human Research Ethics Committee

The University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee granted approval for the 1997–1998 data collection, requiring informed consent by the Newcastle and Lake Macquarie fitness instructors prior to the completion of questionnaires or audiometry. The Australian Hearing Human Research Ethics Committee granted approval for the 2009–2011 Sydney data collection, also requiring informed consent prior to questionnaire completion.

Conflicts of Interest

There were no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest in data collection, analysis, or preparation of the manuscript. The University of Newcastle and Australian Hearing funded the study.


  1. 1.
    Drake-Lee, A.: Beyond music: auditory threshold shift in rock musicians after a heavy metal concert. J. R. Soc. Med. 85, 617–619 (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Phillips, S., Henrich, V., Mace, S.: Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in student musicians. Int. J. Audiol. 49(4), 309–316 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao, F., Manchaiah, V., French, D., Price, S.: Music exposure and hearing disorders: an overview. Int. J. Audiol. 49, 54–64 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmidt, J., Pedersen, E., Paarup, H., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Andersen, T., Poulsen, T., Baelum, J.: Hearing loss in relation to sound exposure of professional symphony orchestra musicians. Ear Hear. 35(4), 448–460 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halevi-Katz, D., Yaakobi, E., Putter-Katz, H.: Exposure to music and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) among professional pop/rock/jazz musicians. Noise Health 17(76), 158–164 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beach, E., Gilliver, M., Williams, W.: Leisure noise exposure: participation, trends, symptoms of hearing damage and perceptions of risk. Int. J. Audiol. 52(sup 1), S20–S25 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yaremchuk, K., Kaczor, J.: Noise levels in the health club setting. Ear Nose Throat J. 78, 54–57 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Torre III, P., Howell, J.: Noise levels during aerobics and the potential effects on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J. Commun. Disord. 41, 501–511 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beach, E.: Noise levels in fitness classes are still too high: evidence from 1997–1998 and 2009–2011. Arch Environ Occup Health 69(4), 223–230 (2014). doi: 10.1080/19338244.2013.771248
  10. 10.
    Safe Work Australia: Model Work Health and Safety Regulations 2011 Ch. 4 Hazardous Work: Part 4. 1 Noise (rev. 2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC). ABS Catalogue No.1292.0 (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 22.0. IBM Corp, Armonk (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deloitte Access Economics: The Australian Fitness Industry Workforce Report 2010–2020. Fitness Australia (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Standards Australia: AS/NZ 1269.1:2005 Occupational Noise Management—Measurement and Assessment of Noise Immission and Exposure. Standards Australia (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    International Standards Organisation: ISO 7029: Acoustics—Statistical Distribution of Hearing Thresholds as a Function of Age, 2nd edn. SAI Global (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beach, E., Williams, W., Gilliver, G.: Estimating young Australian adults’ risk of hearing damage from selected leisure activities. Ear Hear. 34(1), 75–82 (2013). doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318262ac6c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Satish, K.: Significance of 6 khz in noise induced hearing loss in Indian Air Force personnel. Indian J. Aerosp. Med. 52(2), 15–20 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beach, E.: Up the beat—not the volume! Australian Fitness Network. (2013). Accessed 10 September 2015

Copyright information

© Australian Acoustical Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Health & Medicine, School of Health SciencesThe University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  2. 2.National Acoustic LaboratoriesAustralian Hearing HubSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations