Acoustics Australia

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 33–39 | Cite as

The Acoustics of Vineyard Halls, is it so Great After all?

Original Paper
  • 186 Downloads

Abstract

Many contemporary concert halls are so called surround or vineyard design, in which audience members gather around the orchestra. However, not so many articles on the acoustics of such halls have been published. This article presents the acoustical differences of vineyard and shoebox designs. A recently opened vineyard-type hall, Helsinki Music Centre, is used as a case study, and we discuss its perceptual acoustic qualities and investigate the reasons for subjective observations with objective room-acoustic measurements. In particular, we focus on factors affecting the perception of music dynamics. Results from the objective parameters and spatiotemporal analysis show that the sound field is dominated by the direct sound and early energy in the median plane. These findings are in agreement with the perceptual effects, and resemble the acoustic conditions of another vineyard hall, Berlin Philharmonie. A comparison to a classical shoebox hall reveals fundamental differences in the structure of the sound field.

Keywords

Concert halls Acoustics Perception Architecture 

PACS

PACS 43.55.Fw PACS 43.55.Gx 

References

  1. 1.
    Pätynen, J., Tervo, S., Robinson, P.W., Lokki, T.: Concert halls with strong lateral reflections enhance musical dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Am. 111(12), 4409 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagata Acoustics, Helsinki Music Centre factsheet, cited 10 February 2015. URL: http://www.nagata.co.jp/e_sakuhin/factsheets/helsinki.pdf
  3. 3.
    Gade, A.C.: Auditorium projects in Denmark since year 2000; room acoustic research and experience materialized. In: Joint Baltic-Nordic Acoustics Meeting (BNAM 2012), Odense, Denmark (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clements, P.: Orchestral performance practice and the perception of acoustic quality in concert halls. In: International Symposium on Room Acoustics (ISRA 2013). International Symposium on Room Acoustics 2013, Toronto, Canada (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luce, D.: Dynamic spectrum changes of orchestral instruments. J. Audio Eng. Soc 23(7), 565 (1975)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Algazi, V.R., Duda, R.O., Thompson, D.M., Avendano, C.: The CIPIC HRTF database. In: IEEE Workshop on the Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA2001), pp. 99–102. New York (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sivonen, V.P., Ellermeier, W.: Directional loudness in an anechoic sound field, head-related transfer functions, and binaural summation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119(5), 2965 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore, B.C.J., Glasberg, B.R.: Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns. Hear. Res. 28, 209 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marshall, A.H., Barron, M.: Spatial responsiveness in concert halls and the origins of spatial impression. Appl. Acoust. 62(2), 91 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuhl, W.: Räumlichkeit als Komponente des Raumeindrucks. Acta Acust United Ac 40(3), 167 (1978)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keet, W.V.: The influence of early lateral reflections on the spatial impression. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Acoustics, vol. 3, pp. E53–E56. Tokyo, Japan (1968)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marshall, A.H.: A note on the importance of room cross-section in concert halls. J. Sound. Vib. 5(1), 100 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beranek, L.: Concert Halls and Opera Houses: Music, Acoustics, and Architecture. Springer, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lokki, T., Pätynen, J., Tervo, S., Siltanen, S., Savioja, L.: Engaging concert hall acoustics is made up of temporal envelope preserving reflections. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129(6), EL223 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO 3382–1:2009: Acoustics—Measurement of room acoustic parameters—I: Performance spaces. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pätynen, J., Tervo, S., Lokki, T.: Analysis of concert hall acoustics via visualizations of time-frequency and spatiotemporal responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.133(2), 842 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pätynen, J.: A virtual symphony orchestra for studies on concert hall acoustics. Ph.D. thesis, Aalto University School of Science. http://lib.tkk.fi/Diss/2011/isbn9789526042916/isbn9789526042916.pdf (2011)
  18. 18.
    Tervo, S., Pätynen, J., Kuusinen, A., Lokki, T.: Spatial decomposition method for room impulse responses. J. Audio. Eng. Soc. 61(1/2), 16 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barron, M., Lee, L.J.: Energy relations in concert auditoriums. I. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(2), 618 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pätynen, J., Lokki, T.: Directivities of symphony orchestra instruments. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 96(1), 138 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Acoustical Society 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceAalto UniversityAaltoFinland

Personalised recommendations