Abstract
The integration of information technology into various industries has a significant impact on our societal landscape. This study explores the impact of public service levels on human development, especially in the developing digital era. Using data collected from 31 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) in China between 2011 and 2019, the study finds that the improvement of public service levels promotes human development. Meanwhile, digitalization strengthens the positive impact of public services on human development. The paper confirms the positive effects of digital development, providing an empirical basis for promoting the integration of public services and digitalization. The government should strengthen the digital development of public services to provide new driving forces for achieving human development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Interpretation of the 14th Five-Year Plan for Development of the Digital Economy: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/jd/jd/202201/t20220121_1312588_ext.html.
It should be noted that because the data on online government service capacity only span 2015–2019, the number of years of data for this variable is less than that for the others.
It should be noted that the use of the lagged term for public service level reduces the number of observations in the analysis.
References
Ahmad M, Majeed A, Khan MA, Sohaib M, Shehzad K (2021) Digital financial inclusion and economic growth: provincial data analysis of China. China Econ J 14(3):291–310
Ally M, Samaka M (2013) Open education resources and mobile technology to narrow the learning divide. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 14(2):14–27
Álvarez NN (2020) Imagining development: the Chilean dictatorship and the case for political freedom as a factor in the human development index. J Human Dev Capab 21(2):121–136
Anand S, Ravallion M (1993) Human development in poor countries: on the role of private incomes and public services. J Econ Perspect 7(1):133–150
Bekkers VJJM, Zouridis S (1999) Electronic service delivery in public administration: some trends and issues. Int Rev Adm Sci 65(2):183–195
Chen S, Tan Z, He X, Zhang L (2023) The measurements and analysis of spatial-temporal variations of human development index based on planetary boundaries in China: evidence from provincial-level data. Land 12(3):691
Cheng Z, Smyth R (2015) Crime victimization, neighborhood safety and happiness in China. Econ Model 51:424–435
de Sousa RG, Paulo E, Marôco J (2017) Longitudinal factor analysis of public expenditure composition and human development in Brazil after the 1988 constitution. Soc Indic Res 134:1009–1026
Djankov S, Glaeser E, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2003) The new comparative economics. J Comp Econ 31(4):595–619
Frey BS, Luechinger S, Stutzer A (2009) The life satisfaction approach to valuing public goods: the case of terrorism. Public Choice 138(3):317–345
Gan L, Ren H, Xiang W, Wu K, Cai W (2021) Nonlinear influence of public services on urban housing prices: a case study of China. Land 10(10):1007
Guo F, Wang J, Wang F, Sun T, Zhang X (2020) Measuring China’s digital financial inclusion: index compilation and spatial characteristics. China Econ Quart 4:1401–1418
Gupta B, Dasgupta S, Gupta A (2008) Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: an empirical study. J Strateg Inf Syst 17(2):140–154
Im T, Cho W, Porumbescu G, Park J (2014) Internet, trust in government, and citizen compliance. J Public Adm Res Theor 24(3):741–763
Jordá V, Sarabia JM (2015) Well-being distribution in the globalization era: 30 years of convergence. Appl Res Qual Life 10(1):123–140
Karpathakis K, Libow G, Potts HWW, Dixon S, Greaves F, Murray E (2021) An evaluation service for digital public health interventions: user-centered design approach. J Med Internet Res 23(9):e28356
Levinson A (2012) Valuing public goods using happiness data: the case of air quality. J Public Econ 96(9–10):869–880
Li T, Zhao Y, Kong X (2022) Spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of basic public service levels in the Yangtze River Delta Region. China Land 11(9):1477
Liang M, Niu S, Li Z, Qiang W (2019) International comparison of human development index corrected by greenness and fairness indicators and policy implications for China. Soc Indic Res 142:1–24
Linders D (2012) From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov Inf Q 29(4):446–454
Liu C, Nie F, Ren D (2021) Temporal and spatial evolution of China’s human development index and its determinants: an extended study based on five new development concepts. Soc Indic Res 157:247–282
Liu C, Tu J, He Y (2023) Measurement of China’s human development index and analysis of its influencing factors from the perspective of new development concept. Soc Indic Res 167:213–268
Ma L, Christensen T, Zheng Y (2023) Government technological capacity and public-private partnerships regarding digital service delivery: evidence from Chinese cities. Int Rev Adm Sci 89(1):95–111
Miranda-Lescano R, Muinelo-Gallo L, Roca-Sagalés O (2023) Human development and decentralization: the importance of public health expenditure. Ann Public Coop Econ 94(1):191–219
Morris N (2003) Health, well-being and open space. Edinburgh College of Art and Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
Mundle S (1998) Financing human development: some lessons from advanced Asian countries. World Dev 26(4):659–672
Musgrave RA, Peacock AT (1958) Classics in the theory of public finance. Springer, Berlin
Qi Y, Liu C, Ding S (2020) Digital economic development, employment structure optimization and employment quality upgrading. Econ Perspect 11:17–35
Reddick CG, Zheng Y (2017) Determinants of citizens’ mobile apps future use in Chinese local governments: an analysis of survey data. Transform Gov People, Process Policy 11(2):213–235
Tang T, Ho ATK (2019) A path-dependence perspective on the adoption of Internet of Things: evidence from early adopters of smart and connected sensors in the United States. Gov Inf Q 6(2):321–332
Tangi L, Benedetti M, Gastaldi L, Noci G, Russo C (2021) Mandatory provisioning of digital public services as a feasible service delivery strategy: evidence from Italian local governments. Gov Inf Q 38(1):101543
Veenhoven R (2000) Well-being in the welfare state: level not higher, distribution not more equitable. J Comp Policy Anal Res Pract 2(1):91–125
Wang Q, Liu J, Zheng Y (2022) Evolutionary game analysis of community elderly care service regulation in the context of “Internet+.” Front Public Health 10:1093451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1093451
Witesman EM, Walters L, Christensen RK (2023) Creating a public service topology: mapping public service motivation, public service ethos, and public service values. Public Adm. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12939
Zhou X, Chen S, Chen L, Li L (2021) Social class identity, public service satisfaction, and happiness of residents: the mediating role of social trust. Front Psychol 12:659657
Funding
The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Ethics approval was not required for this research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
The 31 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) in the paper are: Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei Province, Shanxi Province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Liaoning Province, Jilin Province, Heilongjiang Province, Shanghai, Jiangsu Province, Zhejiang Province, Anhui Province, Fujian Province, Jiangxi Province, Shandong Province, Henan Province, Hubei Province, Hunan Province, Guangdong Province, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Hainan Province, Chongqing, Sichuan Province, Guizhou Province, Yunnan Province, Tibet Autonomous Region, Shaanxi Province, Gansu Province, Qinghai Province, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cai, Q. Public service level and human development in the context of digitalization. J. Soc. Econ. Dev. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-023-00293-6
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-023-00293-6