Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Validation of a 3DOF Force Sensing Tool for In-Situ Surgical Robotics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although robotic surgery has proved its advantages over traditional surgery methods, the lack of force sensing in the robotic systems poses a challenge to further advancements in the field. Many studies introducing force estimation to robotic surgery are tested on benchtop models. This is not an accurate representation of the robotic surgery environment. In this paper, the focus is on the development and validation of a surgical robotic tool capable of 3 degrees of freedom (DOF) force sensing while being employed in-situ in its native environment.

Methods

The da Vinci surgical system was paired with the da Vinci research kit (dVRK) to create a surgical robotic research platform. A da Vinci classic mega needle driver tool was instrumented with fiber braggs gratings (FBGS) strain sensors to estimate force measurements. The installation and cable management of the optical fibers allowed for native tool use. The tool was calibrated using a surrogate tissue rigidly attached to a 6 DOF industrial grade load cell. Validation was performed on three different models: (1) surrogate tissue, (2) bovine tongue, and (3) porcine uterine horn.

Results

The sensor instrumented tool estimated forces with a root mean error of under 1 N on all 3 models while performing complex teleoperation tasks.

Conclusion

The design described demonstrated the ability to accurately measure force on tissue surrogates in an in-vitro setting. By providing a robotic-MIS surgical tool capable of force sensing and that allows native use of the surgical robotic system, further research into clinical applications of force measurements can be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

My manuscript has no associated data or data will not be deposited.

References

  1. Aggarwal, R. (2004). Robotics and surgery: A long-term relationship. International Journal of Surgery, 2(2), 106–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Armijo, S. P. E. B. P. R. (2018). Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeries’ conversion: A study of trends and costs. Surgical Endoscopy, 32, 2106–2113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Olavarria, K. B. S. S. O. A. (2020). Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: Multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. bmj. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2457

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Surgical, I. (2020). Da Vinci X/Xi instrument & accessory catalog. Intuitive Surgical Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reiley, C. E. (2008). Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 135(1), 196–202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Saracino, A. (2019). Haptic feedback in the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK): A user study based on grasping, palpation, and incision tasks. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 15(4), e1999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trejos, A. (2010). Force sensing and its application in minimally invasive surgery and therapy: A survey. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 224(7), 1435–1454.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liang, Q. (2018). Multi-component FBG-based force sensing systems by comparison with other sensing technologies: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 18(18), 7345–7357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ricchiuti, D. (2010). Diminished suture strength after robotic needle driver manipulation. Journal of Endourology, 24(9), 1509–1513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaushik, D. (2012). Effect of robotic manipulation on unidirectional barbed suture integrity: Evaluation of tensile strength and sliding force. Journal of Endourology, 26(6), 711–715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadi Hosseinabadi, A. H., & Salcudean, S. E. (2022). Force sensing in robot-assisted keyhole endoscopy: A systematic survey. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 41(2), 136–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Amirabdollahian, F. (2018). Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot mediated surgery: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 12, 11–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kazanzides, P. (2014). In An open-source research kit for the da Vinci® Surgical System, IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA).

  14. Shahzada, K. S. (2016). Sensorization of a surgical robotic instrument for force sensing. Optical Fibers and Sensors for Medical Diagnostics and Treatment Applications XVI, 9702, 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wallace, S. M. B. J. (1997). Randomized trial of different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery, 84(4), 455–458.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, U. (2017). S-surge: Novel portable surgical robot with multiaxis force-sensing capability for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 22(4), 1717–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, U. (2020). S-Surge: A Portable Surgical Robot Based on a Novel Mechanism With Force-Sensing Capability for Robotic Surgery. Handbook of Robotic and Image Guided Surgery (pp. 265–283). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded and supported by Ethicon inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. PB and SK: Hardware preparation and manipulation was done. MS, SC, and SK: Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by a collective effort. MS: The first draft of the manuscript was written. All authors read and approved of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mulham Soudan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This study did not require ethics approval.

Consent to Participate

No human subjects were involved in this study.

Consent to Publish

No human subjects were involved in this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soudan, M., King, S.L., Chung, S. et al. Development and Validation of a 3DOF Force Sensing Tool for In-Situ Surgical Robotics. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 43, 332–338 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-023-00800-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-023-00800-4

Keywords

Navigation