Skip to main content

The Effects of Diameter, Length and Insertion Method on the Stability of Orthodontic Miniscrew

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the maximum insertion torque value (ITV) of different dimensions of orthodontic miniscrews for primary stability, and further explored the effects of continuous rotation insertion and intermittent rotation insertion methods on the stability of orthodontic miniscrews.

Methods

Six different dimensions of orthodontic miniscrews, three lengths (6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 mm) and two diameters (1.4 and 1.6 mm), were inserted into the artificial bone specimens by using a torque testing machine, and continuous and intermittent rotation insertion methods were applied. There were a total of 12 groups, and each group was composed of five samples. The torque testing machine was used to record the maximum ITV and torque-time curve.

Results

The median maximum ITV of the orthodontic miniscrews in the 12 groups ranged between 11.5 and 23.7 N cm. In orthodontic miniscrews of 1.6 mm diameter, regardless of the insertion method, the ITV increased with length. For orthodontic miniscrews of 1.4 mm diameter, there was no statistical difference in the maximum ITV regardless of the inserted method as the differences in length were negligible (only 2.0 mm). Furthermore, there was no statistical difference in the maximum ITV required for the continuous rotation insertion and intermittent rotation insertion methods between inserting orthodontic miniscrews of similar dimensions.

Conclusion

The maximum ITV mostly increased with the increase in the diameter or length of the orthodontic miniscrew. There was no statistical difference in the maximum ITV required for continuous rotation and intermittent rotation insertion methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Data Availability

The data sets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Cons, N. C., Jenny, J., Kohout, F. J., & Jotikastira, D. (1989). Utility of the dental aesthetic index in industrialized and developing countries. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 49, 163–166.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Krishnan, V. (2007). Orthodontic pain: From causes to management—a review. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 29, 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, J.-H., Huang, H.-L., Liu, C.-F., Wu, J., Li, Y.-F., Tsai, M.-T., & Hsu, J.-T. (2016). Does orthodontic treatment affect the alveolar bone density? Medicine, 95, e3080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, C.-H., Chang, C.-S., Hsieh, C.-H., Tseng, Y.-C., Shen, Y.-S., Huang, I.-Y., Yang, C.-F., & Chen, C.-M. (2006). The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 64, 1209–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park, H.-S., Lee, S.-K., & Kwon, O.-W. (2005). Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. The Angle Orthodontist, 75, 602–609.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Papadopoulos, M., Papageorgiou, S., & Zogakis, I. (2011). Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants: A meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, 90, 969–976.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Papageorgiou, S. N., Zogakis, I. P., & Papadopoulos, M. A. (2012). Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 142, 577-595.e577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nienkemper, M., Handschel, J., & Drescher, D. (2014). Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading. International Journal of Oral Science, 6, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stanford, N. (2011). Mini-screws success rates sufficient for orthodontic treatment. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 12, 19–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leo, M., Cerroni, L., Pasquantonio, G., Condò, S., & Condò, R. (2016). Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in orthodontics: Review of the factors that influence the clinical success rate of the mini-implants. Clinica Terapeutica, 167, e70-77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reynders, R. A. M., Ronchi, L., Ladu, L., van Etten-Jamaludin, F., & Bipat, S. (2012). Insertion torque and success of orthodontic mini-implants: A systematic review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 142, 596-614.e595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilmes, B., Rademacher, C., Olthoff, G., & Drescher, D. (2006). Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 67, 162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Motoyoshi, M., Hirabayashi, M., Uemura, M., & Shimizu, N. (2006). Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 17, 109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suzuki, E. Y., & Suzuki, B. (2011). Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139, 669–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Watanabe, T., Miyazawa, K., Fujiwara, T., Kawaguchi, M., Tabuchi, M., & Goto, S. (2017). Insertion torque and Periotest values are important factors predicting outcome after orthodontic miniscrew placement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 152, 483–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim, S.-A., Cha, J.-Y., & Hwang, C.-J. (2008). Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length. The Angle Orthodontist, 78, 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Song, Y.-Y., Cha, J.-Y., & Hwang, C.-J. (2007). Mechanical characteristics of various orthodontic mini-screws in relation to artificial cortical bone thickness. The Angle Orthodontist, 77, 979–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chung, C. J., Jung, K.-Y., Choi, Y. J., & Kim, K.-H. (2014). Biomechanical characteristics and reinsertion guidelines for retrieved orthodontic miniscrews. The Angle Orthodontist, 84, 878–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Han, C.-M., Watanabe, K., Tsatalis, A. E., Lee, D., Zheng, F., Kyung, H.-M., Deguchi, T., & Kim, D.-G. (2019). Evaluations of miniscrew type-dependent mechanical stability. Clinical Biomechanics, 69, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kravitz, N. D., Kusnoto, B., Tsay, T. P., & Hohlt, W. F. (2007). The use of temporary anchorage devices for molar intrusion. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 138, 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuroda, S., & Tanaka, E. (2014). Risks and complications of miniscrew anchorage in clinical orthodontics. Japanese Dental Science Review, 50, 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reynders, R., Ronchi, L., & Bipat, S. (2009). Mini-implants in orthodontics: A systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hsu, J.-T., Huang, H.-L., Tu, M.-G., & Fuh, L.-J. (2010). Effect of bone quality on the artificial temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 109, e1–e5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hsu, J.-T., Huang, H.-L., Tsai, M.-T., Wu, A.-J., Tu, M.-G., & Fuh, L.-J. (2013). Effects of the 3D bone-to-implant contact and bone stiffness on the initial stability of a dental implant: Micro-CT and resonance frequency analyses. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 42, 276–280.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Whang, C., Bister, D., & Sherriff, M. (2011). An in vitro investigation of peak insertion torque values of six commercially available mini-implants. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 33, 660–666.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, Y.-K., Kim, Y.-J., Yun, P.-Y., & Kim, J.-W. (2009). Effects of the taper shape, dual-thread, and length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants. The Angle Orthodontist, 79, 908–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan (Grant Number: 10771709) and China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan (CMU110-MF-95).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jui-Ting Hsu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial or personal relationships with people or organizations that could be considered inappropriate for conducting this study.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, WP., Yu, JH., Wang, SH. et al. The Effects of Diameter, Length and Insertion Method on the Stability of Orthodontic Miniscrew. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 42, 508–515 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-022-00737-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-022-00737-0

Keywords

  • Orthodontic miniscrew
  • Stability
  • Insertion torque
  • Inserted method