Skip to main content

Size Constraint to Limit Interference in DRL-Free Single-Ended Biopotential Measurements

Abstract

Purpose

In this work, it is shown that small, battery-powered wireless devices are so robust against electromagnetic interference that single-ended amplifiers can become a viable alternative for biopotential measurements, even without a Driven Right Leg (DRL) circuit.

Methods

A power line interference analysis is presented for this case showing that this simple circuitry solution is feasible, and presenting the constraints under which it is so: small-size devices with dimensions less than 40 mm × 20 mm.

Results

A functional prototype of a two-electrode wireless acquisition system was implemented using a single-ended amplifier. This allowed validating the power-line interference model with experimental results, including the acquisition of electromyographic (EMG) signals. The prototype, built with a size fulfilling the proposed guidelines, presented power-line interference voltages below 1.2 µVPP when working in an office environment.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that a single-ended biopotential amplifier can be used if a sufficiently large isolation impedance is achieved with small-size wireless devices. This approach allows measurements with only two electrodes, a very simple front-end design, and a reduced number of components.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. Guk, K., Han, G., Lim, J., Jeong, K., Kang, T., Lim, E.-K., & Jung, J. (2019). Evolution of wearable devices with real-time disease monitoring for personalized healthcare. Nanomaterials, 9(6), 813. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9060813

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cosoli, G., Spinsante, S., Scardulla, F., D’Acquisto, L., & Scalise, L. (2021). Wireless ECG and cardiac monitoring systems: State of the art, available commercial devices and useful electronic components. Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Winter, B. B., & Webster, J. G. (1983). Driven-right-leg circuit design. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-30(1), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1983.325168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Levkov, C. L. (1982). Amplification of biosignals by body potential driving. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 20, 248–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441364

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Levkov, C. L. (1988). Amplification of biosignals by body potential driving. Analysis of the circuit performance. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 26, 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442297

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prutchi, D., & Norris, M. (2005). Design and Development of Medical Electronic Instrumentation: A practical perspective of the design, construction, and test of medical devices. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haberman, M. A., & Spinelli, E. M. (2012). A multichannel EEG acquisition scheme based on single ended amplifiers and digital DRL. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 6(6), 614–618. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2012.2190733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biosemi. (2021). Biosemi BV: Amsterdam. Retrieved October 1, 2021, from https://biosemi.com/

  9. Thakor, N. V., & Webster, J. G. (1980). Ground-free ECG recording with two electrodes. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-27(12), 699–704. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1980.326595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Towe, B. C. (1981). Comments on “Ground-free ECG recording with two electrodes.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-28(12), 838–839. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1981.324687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Metting van Rijn, A. C., Peper, A., & Grimbergen, C. A. (1990). High-quality recording of bioelectric events—part 1: Interference reduction, theory and practice. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 28, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441961

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huhta, J. C., & Webster, J. G. (1973). 60-Hz interference in electrocardiography. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-20(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1973.324169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Metting van Rijn, A. C., Peper, A., & Grimbergen, C. A. (1991). The isolation mode rejection ratio in bioelectric amplifiers. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 38(11), 1154–1157. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.99079

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wood, D. E., Ewins, D. J., & Balachandran, W. (1995). Comparative analysis of power-line interference between two- or three-electrode biopotential amplifiers. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 33, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522948

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spinelli, E. M., & Mayosky, M. A. (2005). Two-electrode biopotential measurements: Power line interference analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 52(8), 1436–1442. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2005.851488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guermandi, M., Scarselli, E. F., & Guerrieri, R. (2016). A driving right leg circuit (DgRL) for improved common mode rejection in bio-potential acquisition systems. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 10(2), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2015.2446753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Babusiak, B., Borik, S., & Smondrk, M. (2020). Two-electrode ECG for ambulatory monitoring with minimal hardware complexity. Sensors, 20(8), 2386. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082386

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. MAX30003 datasheet. (2021). Maxim Integrated: San Jose. Retrieved October 1, 2021, from https://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/MAX30003.pdf

  19. Dobrev, D., & Daskalov, I. (2002). Two-electrode biopotential amplifier with current-driven inputs. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 40, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347705

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dobrev, D. (2004). Two-electrode low supply voltage electrocardiogram signal amplifier. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 42, 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344642

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Anisimov, A., Alekseev, B., Egorov, D. (2019). Development of portable cardiograph using novel front-end solutions. In: Proceeding of the 25th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT), IEEE, pp. 32–37. https://doi.org/10.23919/FRUCT48121.2019.8981497

  22. Rosell, J., Colominas, J., Riu, P., Pallas-Areny, R., & Webster, J. G. (1988). Skin impedance from 1 Hz to 1 MHz. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 35(8), 649–651. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.4599

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Haberman, M. A., Cassino, A., & Spinelli, E. M. (2011). Estimation of stray coupling capacitances in biopotential measurements. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 49, 1067–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0811-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Iossel, Y. Y., Kochanov, E. S., & Strunskii, M. G. (1981). Capacitance of flat plates. The calculation of electrical capacitance (pp. 119–122). Energoizdat.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Spinelli, E. M. (2014). High input impedance DC servo loop circuit. Electronics Letters, 50(24), 1808–1809. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2014.2262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Guerrero, F. N., Spinelli, E. M. (2015). Surface EMG multichannel measurements using active, dry branched electrodes. In: VI Latin American Congress on Biomedical Engineering CLAIB 2014, Paraná, Argentina 29, 30 & 31 October 2014. IFMBE Proceedings, vol. 49, Springer, Cham, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13117-7_1

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET, Argentina) under Grant PIP-0323; by the La Plata National University (UNLP, Argentina) under Grants I-254 and I-014; and by the National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion (ANPCyT, Argentina) under Grant PICT-2018-03747.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by VAC and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentín A. Catacora.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 114 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Catacora, V.A., Guerrero, F.N. & Spinelli, E.M. Size Constraint to Limit Interference in DRL-Free Single-Ended Biopotential Measurements. J. Med. Biol. Eng. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-022-00720-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-022-00720-9

Keywords

  • Biopotential amplifier
  • Electromagnetic interference
  • Single-ended system
  • Two-electrode measurement