Combination of XGBoost Analysis and Rule-Based Method for Intrapartum Cardiotocograph Classification

Abstract

Purpose

The two major components of a cardiotocograph (CTG) are uterine contraction (UC) and fetal heart rate (FHR) signals. CTG has been widely used to monitor fetal well-being in the past 50 years. The guideline provided by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) classifies CTG patterns into three categories (I, II, and III) in evaluating the status of a fetus. However, manual interpretation of CTG is time-consuming and is subjected to inter-personal bias.

Methods

In this study, we combined the rule-based method and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) analysis in classifying CTG patterns. Because of the persistent controversies about the Category II of NICHD, XGBoost analysis was used to classify it into IIa and IIb. A total of 68 pregnant women were enrolled in this study.

Results

Three categories (I, II, and III) were consistent in both manual interpretation by clinicians and our algorithm across all categories, and the average Kappa was about 0.72. The probability of fetal distress (FD) was 28.8% and 71.2% in the categories IIa and IIb, respectively.

Conclusion

These findings show the proposed method has the potential to provide a clinical assistant tool to monitor fetal well-being and has high potential to be an assistive and warning system to reduce the burden of medical staff.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Lean, S. C., Derricott, H., Jones, R. L., & Heazell, A. E. (2017). Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 12(10), e0186287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gretchen Livingston. (2018). Pew Research Center. Retrieved December 17, 2020 from https://reurl.cc/VE7Lk5.

  3. 3.

    Khalil, A., Syngelaki, A., Maiz, N., Zinevich, Y., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2013). Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: A cohort study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 42(6), 634–643.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Martin, C. B., Jr. (2008). Normal fetal physiology and behavior, and adaptive responses with hypoxemia. Seminars in Perinatology, 32, 239–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fowden, A. L., Coan, P. M., Angiolini, E., Burton, G. J., & Constancia, M. (2011). Imprinted genes and the epigenetic regulation of placental phenotype. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 106(1), 281–288.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Parker, S. E., & Werler, M. M. (2014). Epidemiology of ischemic placental disease: A focus on preterm gestations. Seminars in Perinatology, 38(3), 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Graham, E. M., Ruis, K. A., Hartman, A. L., Northington, F. J., & Fox, H. E. (2008). A systematic review of the role of intrapartum hypoxia-ischemia in the causation of neonatal encephalopathy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 199(6), 587–595.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ugwumadu, A. (2013). Understanding cardiotocographic patterns associated with intrapartum fetal hypoxia and neurologic injury. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 27(4), 509–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Alfirevic, Z., Gyte, G. M., Cuthbert, A., & Devane, D. (2017). Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2).

  10. 10.

    Macones, G. A., Hankins, G. D., Spong, C. Y., Hauth, J., & Moore, T. (2008). The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: Update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 37(5), 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Alyousif, S., Mohd, M. A., Bilal, B., Sheikh, M., & Algunaidi, M. (2016). Rule-based algorithm for intrapartum cardiotocograph pattern features extraction and classification. Health Science Journal, 10(6), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chen, C. Y., Yu, C., Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. W. (2014). Comparison of a novel computerized analysis program and visual interpretation of cardiotocography. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e112296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Penfield, C. A., Hong, C., Ibrahim, S. E. H., Kilpatrick, S. J., & Gregory, K. D. (2016). A system to stratify category II fetal heart rate tracings. American Journal of Perinatology, 33(07), 688–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Martí Gamboa, S., Pascual Mancho, J., Lapresta Moros, M., Rodríguez Lázaro, L., de Bonrostro Torralba, C., & Castán Mateo, S. (2017). Atypical decelerations: Do they matter? The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 30(2), 240–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    F Gary, C. (2014). Williams Obstetrics 24th Edition.

  16. 16.

    Wrobel, J., Roj, D., Jezewski, J., Horoba, K., Kupka, T., & Jezewski, M. (2015). Evaluation of the robustness of fetal heart rate variability measures to low signal quality. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 5(6), 1311–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Romano, M., Bifulco, P., Ponsiglione, A. M., Gargiulo, G. D., Amato, F., & Cesarelli, M. (2018). Evaluation of floatingline and foetal heart rate variability. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 39, 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    P. W. Wu. (2018). Application of rule-based analysis and sequence analysis in neural network classifier for wearable pregnancy monitoring device. Master thesis, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology.

  19. 19.

    Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 785–794).

  20. 20.

    Torlay, L., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Thomas, E., & Baciu, M. (2017). Machine learning–XGBoost analysis of language networks to classify patients with epilepsy. Brain Informatics, 4(3), 159–169.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ogunleye, A., & Wang, Q. G. (2019). XGBoost model for chronic kidney disease diagnosis. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 17(6), 2131–2140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Budholiya, K., Shrivastava, S. K., & Sharma, V. (2020). An optimized XGBoost based diagnostic system for effective prediction of heart disease. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.10.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sartwelle, T. P., Johnston, J. C., & Arda, B. (2015). Perpetuating myths, fables, and fairy tales: A half century of electronic fetal monitoring. The Surgery Journal, 1(1), e28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Santo, S., & Ayres-de-Campos, D. (2012). Human factors affecting the interpretation of fetal heart rate tracings: An update. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 24(2), 84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hruban, L., Spilka, J., Chudáček, V., Janků, P., Huptych, M., Burša, M., et al. (2015). Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 21(4), 694–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Eller, A. G., & Esplin, M. (2020). Management of the category II fetal heart rate tracing. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 63(3), 659–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Raghuraman, N., López, J. D., Carter, E. B., Stout, M. J., Macones, G. A., Tuuli, M. G., et al. (2020). The effect of intrapartum oxygen supplementation on category II fetal monitoring. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 223(6), 905-e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hamilton, E., Warrick, P., & O’Keeffe, D. (2012). Variable decelerations: Do size and shape matter? The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 25(6), 648–653.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Furukawa, A., Neilson, D., & Hamilton, E. (2019). Cumulative deceleration area: A simplified predictor of metabolic acidemia. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1678130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Marti Gamboa, S., Lapresta Moros, M., Pascual Mancho, J., Lapresta Moros, C., & Castan Mateo, S. (2017). Deceleration area and fetal acidemia. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 30(21), 2578–2584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gyllencreutz, E., Lu, K., Lindecrantz, K., Lindqvist, P. G., Nordstrom, L., Holzmann, M., et al. (2018). Validation of a computerized algorithm to quantify fetal heart rate deceleration area. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 97(9), 1137–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the assistance and co-operation of all the patients and medical staff involved in the clinical test.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under Grant MOST 107-2221-E-006 -240 -MY3 and MOST 108-2221-E-006 -231 -MY3.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-Chun Du.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical Approval

The experimental protocol was established, according to the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of National Cheng Kung University Hospital (IRB Number: A-ER-105-477).

Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from individual or guardian participants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuo, PL., Yen, L.B., Du, YC. et al. Combination of XGBoost Analysis and Rule-Based Method for Intrapartum Cardiotocograph Classification. J. Med. Biol. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-021-00642-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cardiotocograph (CTG)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
  • eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)
  • Fetal Distress (FD)