Effects of Fall Height and Impact Strategy on Energy Absorption Ratio Between Shoulder Joint and Elbow Joint
Falls onto an outstretched hand are the leading cause of upper extremity injury. However, little information is available regarding the effects of fall height and impact strategy on energy absorption ratio between shoulder joint and elbow joint. Twelve male subjects participated in the study. The subjects were asked to perform simulated falls from three different fall heights (5, 10 and 15) using three different conscious strategies, namely Conscious Elbow Dominant Strategy, Conscious Shoulder Dominant Strategy, and Conscious Intermediate Dominant Strategy, corresponding with three different theoretical strategies, namely Elbow Dominant Strategy, Intermediate Dominant Strategy and Shoulder Dominant Strategy for biomechanical analysis. For a fall height of 5 cm, the Elbow Dominant Strategy was found better than other impact strategies, resulting in an Optimal Energy Absorption Ratio of 1.60. For an increased fall height of 10 cm, the Intermediate Dominant Strategy was found better than other impact strategies, with an Optimal Energy Absorption Ratio of 1.99. Finally, for a fall height of 15 cm, the Shoulder Dominant Strategy was found better than other impact strategies, with an Optimal Energy Absorption Ratio of 2.40. The findings presented in this study provide a useful source of reference to clinicians, sports coaches and instructors in devising optimal fall strategies for minimizing the risk of upper extremity injuries in the event of forward falls onto the outstretched hand.
KeywordsFall height Impact strategy Energy absorption ratio Elbow joint Shoulder joint
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided to this study by the National Science Council of Taiwan.
- 2.Kiwerski, J. (1972). Peripheral nerve injuries associated with traumatic lesions of bones and joints of the upper extremity. Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny, 44(10), 1519–1524.Google Scholar
- 4.Simonet, W. T., Melton, L. J., 3rd, Cofield, R. H., & Ilstrup, D. M. (1984). Incidence of anterior shoulder dislocation in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 86, 186–191.Google Scholar
- 11.Palvanen, M., Kannus, P., Parkkari, J., Pitkajarvi, T., Pasanen, M., Vuori, I., et al. (2000). The injury mechanisms of osteoporotic upper extremity fractures among older adults: a controlled study of 287 consecutive patients and their 108 controls. Osteoporosis International, 11(10), 822–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Chou, P. H., Chen, S. K., Chou, Y. L., Su, F. C., Shi, Y. C., Huang, G. F., et al. (2002). Biomechanical analyses for the effects of elbow initial flexion angles on upper extremity during a fall. Biomedical Engineering: Applications, Basis and Communications, 14(1), 40–46.Google Scholar
- 20.Haug, E. J. (1989). Computer aided kinematics and dynamics of mechanical systems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- 23.Wu, G., van der Helm, F. C., Veeger, H. E., Makhsous, M., Van Roy, P., Anglin, C., et al. (2005). ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion–Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. Journal of Biomechanics, 38(5), 981–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Dempster, W. T. (1995). Space requirements of the seated operator, geometrical, kinematic, and mechanical aspects of the body with special reference to the limbs. Technical Report (55–159) (AD 87892). Wright Air Development Center, Air Research and Development Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.Google Scholar
- 26.Chou, P. H., Chou, Y. L., Lee, S. L., You, J. Y., Su, F. C., & Chen, H. S. (2001). Kinematical strategy to regain balance during a forward fall on a slippery floor. Biomedical Engineering: Applications, Basis and Communications, 13(1), 27–32.Google Scholar
- 27.Chaffin, D. B., Andersson, G., & Martin, B. J. (1999). Occupational biomechanics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 28.Huston, R. L., & Liu, Y. S. (1996). Optimal human posture-analysis of a waitperson holding a tray. The Ohio Journal of Science, 96(4–5), 93–96.Google Scholar