Assessing Surgical Outcomes via Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis in Cleft Rhinoplasty
- 72 Downloads
Cleft rhinoplasty is a challenging procedure with variable success in different techniques. To improve surgical outcomes, an objective comparison of techniques is required. This study utilizes computational fluid dynamics (CFD) on pre- and post-operative nasal cavity finite element models to objectively assess the success of cleft rhinoplasty performed on a patient with congenital cleft nasal deformity. Airflow, pressure drop, velocity, and their associated post-operative changes were calculated with an emphasis on the obstructed area. This revealed increased symmetry between the left and right cavities in all parameters post-operatively suggesting good surgical outcome. Focusing on the obstruction site and analyzing the absolute parametric values, instead of observing obscure, subjective flow lines, allowed for an efficient and objective comparison between models. By extending this quantitative comparison via CFD for different cleft lip/palate (CL/P) cases, and observing the relative success of each procedure, a basis for guidelines for CL/P correction could be formed, which could dramatically improve surgical outcomes.
KeywordsCleft rhinoplasty Surgical outcomes Computational fluid dynamics Quantitative analysis
This project was not funded by any external source.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.Kaufman, Y., Buchanan, E. P., Wolfswinkel, E. M., Weathers, W. M., & Stal, S. (2012). Cleft nasal deformity and rhinoplasty. Seminars in Plastic Surgery, 26(4), 184–190.Google Scholar
- 8.Trotman, C. A., Phillips, C., Essick, G. K., Faraway, J. J., Barlow, S. M., Losken, H. W., et al. (2007). Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part I: Study design and surgeon ratings of lip disability and need for lip revision. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 44(6), 598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Zubair, M., Ahmad, K. A., Riazuddin, V. N., Abdullah, M. Z., Rushdan, I., Shuaib, I. L., et al. (2015). Numerical study on the effect of gender on the airflow characteristics inside the nasal cavity. International Journal of Advanced Thermofluid Research, 1(1), 2–16.Google Scholar
- 22.Kita, S., Oshima, M., Shimazaki, K., Iwai, T., Omura, S., & Ono, T. (2016). Computational fluid dynamic study of nasal respiratory function before and after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with bone trimming at the inferior edge of the pyriform aperture. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 74(11), 2241–2251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Bailie, N., Hanna, B., Watterson, J., & Gallagher, G. (2006). An overview of numerical modelling of nasal airflow. Rhinology, 44, 53–57.Google Scholar
- 29.Smith, K. (2008). CFD analysis of pressure and flow characteristics of the human nose. Worcester: Worcester Polytechnic Institute.Google Scholar
- 34.Leong, S. C., Chen, X. B., Lee, H. P., & Wang, D. Y. (2010). A review of the implications of computational fluid dynamic studies on nasal airflow and physiology. Rhinology, 48(2), 139–145.Google Scholar
- 35.Hemtiwakorn, K., Phoocharoen, N., Tungjitkusolmun, S., & Pintavirooj, C. (2009). Nasal airflow simulation in human using computational fluid dynamics. In: Paper presented at the 2nd Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON 2009), Phuket.Google Scholar