Reliability and Validity of Attitude and Heading Reference System Motion Estimation in a Novel Mirror Therapy System
- 91 Downloads
In this study, we conducted an experiment for validating a motion estimation system used in novel mirror therapy. The proposed motion estimation system consists of two parts. The first part is motion estimation using attitude and heading reference system sensors. The system attaches a reference frame to a patient to provide flexibility to the patient’s movements. The second part is a compensation algorithm that uses principal component analysis (PCA). Ten subjects performed simple reaching tasks for the validation experiment. The results showed success rate of 89.67% under normal conditions. The PCA-based compensation algorithm increases the success rate from 89.67 to 92.89%. Accurate capturing of healthy arm motion will make effective robot-aided mirror therapy systems feasible.
KeywordsAttitude and heading reference system Inertia measurement unit Motion estimation Robot-aided mirror therapy Principal component analysis Robotic rehabilitation
This work was funded by the 2012 Seoul National University Brain Fusion Program (Grant Number: 800-20120444) and BK21 Plus Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (Grant Number: 22A20130011025).
- 1.Sarakoglou, I., Caldwell, D. G., Tsagarakis, N. G., & Kousidou, S. (2007). Exoskeleton-based exercisers for the disabilities of the upper arm and hand. INTECH Open Access Publisher.Google Scholar
- 12.Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Lehman, S. L., & Lum, P. S. (1993). A bimanual therapy robot: controller design and prototype experiments. Proc. IEEE the 15th Annual Internal. Conf. on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 938-939.Google Scholar
- 13.Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., Shor, P. C., Majmundar, M., & Van der Loos, M. (2002). Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(7), 952–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Burgar, C. G., Lum, P. S., Shor, P. C., & Van der Loos, H. M. (2000). Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6), 663–674.Google Scholar
- 15.WANG, W.-W., FU, L.-C. (2011). Mirror therapy with an exoskeleton upper-limb robot based on IMU measurement system. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), pp. 370–375.Google Scholar
- 23.Beom, J., Koh, S., Nam, H. S., Kim, W., Kim, Y., Seo, H. G., et al. (2016). Robotic mirror therapy system for functional recovery of hemiplegic arms. Journal of Visualized Experiments (JoVE), 114, e54521–e54521.Google Scholar