Muscle Activation Levels During Upper Limb Exercise Performed Using Dumbbells and A Spring-Loaded Exoskeleton

Abstract

A spring-loaded exoskeleton design was recently developed for the upper limbs of physically challenged and healthy people, enabling them to move multiple joints of the upper limbs on different motion planes. A four-degree-of-freedom design allows the exoskeleton arms to perform shoulder abduction–adduction, flexion–extension, internal–external rotation, and elbow flexion–extension motions. The purpose of this study was to compare the muscle activation levels during upper limb resistance exercises that were performed using dumbbells and a spring-loaded exoskeleton. The upper limb resistance exercises were conducted under varying conditions, using 1- and 3-kg applied loads, and with 1- and 2-s motion speeds. Six healthy participants performed three movements: shoulder abduction–adduction, shoulder flexion–extension, and elbow flexion–extension. Dumbbells and a spring-loaded upper limb exoskeleton were used as resistance sources. Surface electromyography was applied to analyze participant muscle functions; surface electrodes were placed over the anterior deltoid, middle deltoid, posterior deltoid, pectoralis major, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, upper trapezius, and supraspinatus. All results were presented as normalized surface electromyography amplitudes. Our study findings suggest that muscle activation levels during the three designated upper limb resistance exercises have consistent patterns, and that the difference between using dumbbells and the spring-loaded exoskeleton was mostly nonsignificant; therefore, the spring-loaded exoskeleton is able to provide similar training effects to that of dumbbells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. 1.

    Kraemer, W. J., Adams, K., Cafarelli, E., Dudley, G. A., Dooly, C., Feigenbaum, M. S., et al. (2002). American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34(2), 364–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Faigenbaum, A. D., Kraemer, W. J., Blimkie, C. J., Jeffreys, I., Micheli, L. J., Nitka, M., et al. (2009). Youth resistance training: Updated position statement paper from the national strength and conditioning association. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 23, S60–S79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Williams, M. A., Haskell, W. L., Ades, P. A., Amsterdam, E. A., Bittner, V., Franklin, B. A., et al. (2007). Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update a scientific statement from the american heart association council on clinical cardiology and council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism. Circulation, 116(5), 572–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ries, A. L., Bauldoff, G. S., Carlin, B. W., Casaburi, R., Emery, C. F., Mahler, D. A., et al. (2007). Pulmonary rehabilitation executive summary: Joint american college of chest physicians/american association of cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. CHEST Journal, 131(5_suppl), 1S–3S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sigal, R. J., Kenny, G. P., Wasserman, D. H., Castaneda-Sceppa, C., & White, R. D. (2006). Physical activity/exercise and Type 2 diabetes A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care, 29(6), 1433–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Collins, S. H., Wiggin, M. B., & Sawicki, G. S. (2015). Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton. Nature, 522(7555), 212–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wu, T.-M., Wang, S.-Y., & Chen, D.-Z. (2011). Design of an exoskeleton for strengthening the upper limb muscle for overextension injury prevention. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 46(12), 1825–1839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wu, T.-M., & Chen, D.-Z. (2013). Dynamic analysis and preliminary evaluation of a spring-loaded upper limb exoskeleton for resistance training with overload prevention. Journal of Mechanics, 29(01), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Soderberg, G. L., & Knutson, L. M. (2000). A guide for use and interpretation of kinesiologic electromyographic data. Physical Therapy, 80(5), 485–498.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kamen, G., & Gabriel, D. (2010). Essentials of electromyography. Champaign: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cram, J. R., & Criswell, E. (2011). Cram’s introduction to surface electromyography. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Merletti, R., & Parker, P. A. (2004). Electromyography: Physiology, engineering, and non-invasive applications (Vol. 11). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Felici, F. (2006). Neuromuscular responses to exercise investigated through surface EMG. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 16(6), 578–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hintermeister, R. A., Lange, G. W., Schultheis, J. M., Bey, M. J., & Hawkins, R. J. (1998). Electromyographic activity and applied load during shoulder rehabilitation exercises using elastic resistance. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 26(2), 210–220.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Andersen, L. L., Andersen, C. H., Mortensen, O. S., Poulsen, O. M., Bjørnlund, I. B. T., & Zebis, M. K. (2010). Muscle activation and perceived loading during rehabilitation exercises: Comparison of dumbbells and elastic resistance. Physical Therapy, 90(4), 538–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Myers, J. B., Pasquale, M. R., Laudner, K. G., Sell, T. C., Bradley, J. P., & Lephart, S. M. (2005). On-the-field resistance-tubing exercises for throwers: An electromyographic analysis. Journal of Athletic Training, 40(1), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gabriel, D. A., Kamen, G., & Frost, G. (2006). Neural adaptations to resistive exercise. Sports Medicine, 36(2), 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Li, X., Holobar, A., Gazzoni, M., Merletti, R., Rymer, W. Z., & Zhou, P. (2015). Examination of poststroke alteration in motor unit firing behavior using high-density surface EMG decomposition. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 62(5), 1242–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Burgar, C. G., Lum, P. S., Shor, P. C., & Van der Loos, H. M. (2000). Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6), 663–674.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., & Shor, P. C. (2004). Evidence for improved muscle activation patterns after retraining of reaching movements with the MIME robotic system in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 12(2), 186–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hughes, A.-M., Freeman, C., Burridge, J., Chappell, P., Lewin, P., & Rogers, E. (2010). Shoulder and elbow muscle activity during fully supported trajectory tracking in people who have had a stroke. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20(3), 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wu, T.-M., & Chen, D.-Z. (2014). Biomechanical study of upper-limb exoskeleton for resistance training with three-dimensional motion analysis system. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 51(1), 111.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hamill, J., & Knutzen, K. M. (2006). Biomechanical basis of human movement. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kendall, F. P., McCreary, E. K., Provance, P. G., Rodgers, M. M., & Romani, W. A. (2005). Muscles: Testing and function with posture and pain. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    De Luca, C. J. (1997). The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. Journal of applied biomechanics, 13, 135–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lehman, G. J., & McGill, S. M. (1999). The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: A proof of principle. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 22(7), 444–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Knutson, L. M., Soderberg, G. L., Ballantyne, B. T., & Clarke, W. R. (1994). A study of various normalization procedures for within day electromyographic data. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 4(1), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ekstrom, R. A., Soderberg, G. L., & Donatelli, R. A. (2005). Normalization procedures using maximum voluntary isometric contractions for the serratus anterior and trapezius muscles during surface EMG analysis. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 15(4), 418–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wu, G. (2008). Muscle action pattern and knee extensor strength of older Tai Chi exercisers.

  30. 30.

    Muniz, A. M. d. S., Mell, R. G. T. d., Pereira, G. R., Leporace, G., & Nadal, J. (2013). Application of principal component analysis in myoelectric signal during running in patients with anterior knee pain. In Proceedings of XXIV Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics. Natal, Brazil.

  31. 31.

    Weeks, D. J., Chua, R., & Elliott, D. (2000). Perceptual-motor behavior in down syndrome. Champaign: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Payton, C., & Bartlett, R. (2007). Biomechanical evaluation of movement in sport and exercise: The British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences guide. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Beretta Piccoli, M., Rainoldi, A., Heitz, C., Wüthrich, M., Boccia, G., Tomasoni, E., et al. (2014). Innervation zone locations in 43 superficial muscles: Toward a standardization of electrode positioning. Muscle and Nerve, 49(3), 413–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dar-Zen Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Tzong-Ming Wu, Chih-Han Yang, and Dar-Zen Chen declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The judgement reference number is 9703007.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Statement of human rights

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Statement on the welfare of animals

This study did not contain any procedures involving animals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, TM., Yang, CH. & Chen, DZ. Muscle Activation Levels During Upper Limb Exercise Performed Using Dumbbells and A Spring-Loaded Exoskeleton. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 37, 345–356 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-017-0226-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Electromyography
  • Exoskeleton
  • Free weight exercise
  • Muscle activation
  • Upper limb