Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 788–794 | Cite as

Simple Method for Fabricating Slender Infusion-Recording Assembly in 30-Gauge Syringe Needle

  • Wen-Yi Wu
  • Wei-Chen Hung
  • Chen-Tung Yen
  • Ming-Yuan Min
  • Meng-Li Tsai
Original Article


A device with both infusion and recording components is commonly used to evaluate neuronal responses to neuropharmacological actions in situ. With increasing demand for such devices, many designs have been reported. However, the recording and injection channels are usually limited, and their combination often involves glue, resulting in rough and uneven surfaces. Here, we report the development of a simple method for fabricating a slender infusion tube assembled with recording microwires in a 30-gauge syringe needle. There are four major advantages of the proposed infusion-recording assembly over previously reported models: (1) the small diameter of the infusion cannula minimizes the total volume of the assembly; (2) no extra glue or attachment is needed on the outside so the surface of the assembly remains smooth; (3) the microwires are flexible to allocate and their tip location can be recognized; (4) a larger guide tube can be used (e.g., a 27-gauge needle) to contain more microwires or cannulae if needed. We used this assembly to simultaneously record neuronal activities in response to local deliveries of lidocaine, which caused immediate suppression of neuronal activities that recovered after 15 min. This study shows the manufacture of the infusion-recording device and the successful application of the easy-to-make, inexpensive, and reliable assembly for neuropharmacological studies.


Single-unit recording Electrophysiology Neuropharmacology Microinjection 



This work was funded by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 104-2923-B-197-001-MY3 and MOST 104-2313-B-197-003).


  1. 1.
    Marks, G. A., Speciale, S. G., & Roffwarg, H. P. (1988). A method for concurrent local intracranial drug infusion and electrophysiological recording. Physiology & Behavior, 43(2), 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kiyatkin, E. A., & Rebec, G. V. (2000). Dopamine-independent action of cocaine on striatal and accumbal neurons. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12(5), 1789–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kiyatkin, E. A., & Rebec, G. V. (1997). Iontophoresis of amphetamine in the neostriatum and nucleus accumbens of awake, unrestrained rats. Brain Research, 771(1), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Duuren, E., van der Plasse, G., van der Blom, R., Joosten, R. N., Mulder, A. B., Pennartz, C. M., et al. (2007). Pharmacological manipulation of neuronal ensemble activity by reverse microdialysis in freely moving rats: a comparative study of the effects of tetrodotoxin, lidocaine, and muscimol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 323(1), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brazhnik, E., Borgnis, R., Muller, R. U., & Fox, S. E. (2004). The effects on place cells of local scopolamine dialysis are mimicked by a mixture of two specific muscarinic antagonists. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(42), 9313–9323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haidarliu, S., Sosnik, R., & Ahissar, E. (1999). Simultaneous multi-site recordings and iontophoretic drug and dye applications along the trigeminal system of anesthetized rats. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 94(1), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Höcht, C., Opezzo, J. A. W., & Taira, C. A. (2007). Applicability of reverse microdialysis in pharmacological and toxicological studies. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 55(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2006.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamada, I., & DeLong, M. R. (1992). Excitotoxic acid lesions of the primate subthalamic nucleus result in transient dyskinesias of the contralateral limbs. Journal of Neurophysiology, 68(5), 1850–1858.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tokuno, H., Ikeuchi, Y., Nambu, A., Akazawa, T., Imanishi, M., Hamada, I., et al. (1998). A modified microsyringe for extracellular recording of neuronal activity. Neuroscience Research, 31(3), 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tokuno, H., Hatanaka, N., Chiken, S., & Ishizuka, N. (2002). An improved method with a long-shanked glass micropipette and ultrasonography for drug injection into deep brain structure of the monkey. Brain Research Protocols, 10(1), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsai, M. L., Chai, C. Y., & Yen, C. T. (1997). A simple method for the construction of a recording-injection microelectrode with glass-insulated microwire. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 72(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lai, J., Legault, M. A., Thomas, S., & Casanova, C. (2015). Simultaneous electrophysiological recording and micro-injections of inhibitory agents in the rodent brain. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 101, e52271.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kliem, M. A., & Wichmann, T. (2004). A method to record changes in local neuronal discharge in response to infusion of small drug quantities in awake monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 138(1–2), 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    du Hoffmann, J., Kim, J. J., & Nicola, S. M. (2011). An inexpensive drivable cannulated microelectrode array for simultaneous unit recording and drug infusion in the same brain nucleus of behaving rats. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106(2), 1054–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boehnke, S. E., & Rasmusson, D. D. (2001). Time course and effective spread of lidocaine and tetrodotoxin delivered via microdialysis: an electrophysiological study in cerebral cortex. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 105(2), 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin, J. H. (1991). Autoradiographic estimation of the extent of reversible inactivation produced by microinjection of lidocaine and muscimol in the rat. Neuroscience Letters, 127(2), 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tehovnik, E. J., & Sommer, M. A. (1997). Effective spread and timecourse of neural inactivation caused by lidocaine injection in monkey cerebral cortex. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 74(1), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martin, J. H., & Ghez, C. (1999). Pharmacological inactivation in the analysis of the central control of movement. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 86(2), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sandkuhler, J., & Gebhart, G. F. (1984). Relative contributions of the nucleus raphe magnus and adjacent medullary reticular formation to the inhibition by stimulation in the periaqueductal gray of a spinal nociceptive reflex in the pentobarbital-anesthetized rat. Brain Research, 305(1), 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krupa, D. J., Ghazanfar, A. A., & Nicolelis, M. A. (1999). Immediate thalamic sensory plasticity depends on corticothalamic feedback. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(14), 8200–8205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Taiwanese Society of Biomedical Engineering 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wen-Yi Wu
    • 1
  • Wei-Chen Hung
    • 1
  • Chen-Tung Yen
    • 1
  • Ming-Yuan Min
    • 1
  • Meng-Li Tsai
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Life SciencesNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Biomechatronic EngineeringNational Ilan UniversityIlanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations