Skip to main content
Log in

Automated Screening Methodology for Asthma Diagnosis that Ensembles Clinical and Spirometric Information

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Asthma, a chronic disease, involves various clinico-epidemiological factors. In view of this, its early detection followed by management is required for providing better healthcare support to patients. This paper proposes an efficient machine learning methodology for the computerized detection of asthma that ensembles clinico-epidemiological and spirometric information to help pulmonologists in diagnostic decision-making. A total of 42 features (30 clinico-epidemiological and 12 spirometric parameters) are considered for diagnosing asthma. Statistical evaluation is employed to identify potential features for characterizing asthma. A pattern classification scheme based on three neural network models (probabilistic, radial basis function, and multilayer perceptron neural networks) and the alternating decision (AD) tree technique are investigated. Finally, the performance of the designed diagnostic scheme is evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy. 17 features are found to be statistically significant for discriminating two groups (asthma vs. healthy). Of the trained neural network models, the multilayer perceptron model has the highest accuracy (96.55 % sensitivity, 97.18 % specificity, and 96.86 % overall classification accuracy) for the automated classification of asthma-based statistically significant features. Moreover, the AD tree has a higher asthma screening accuracy (97.73 % sensitivity, 99.53 % specificity, and 99 % overall classification accuracy) than that of the multilayer perceptron model. The AD tree converges to the highest accuracy based on only seven features, which were selected iteratively and automatically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. L. Association, “Asthma,”. http://www.lung.org/assets/documents/publications/lung-disease-data/solddc_2010.pdf“.

  2. Chae, Y. M., Ho, S. H., Hong, C. S., & Kim, C. W. (1996). Comparison of alternative knowledge model for the diagnosis of asthma. Expert Systems with Applications, 11, 423–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi, B. W., Yoo, K. H., Jeong, J. W., Yoon, H. J., Kim, S. H., Park, Y. M., et al. (2007). Easy diagnosis of asthma: computer-assisted, symptom-based diagnosis. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 22, 832–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zolnoori, M., Zarandi, M. H. F., Moin, M., Heidarnezhad, H., & Kazemnejad, A. (2012). Computer-aided intelligent system for diagnosing pediatric asthma. Journal of Medical Systems, 36, 809–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zarandi, M. F., Zolnoori, M., Moin, M., & Heidarnejad, H. (2010). A fuzzy rule-based expert system for diagnosing Asthma. Transaction E: Industrial Engineering, 17, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heris, T., Langarizadeh, M., Mahmoodvand, Z., & Zolnoori, M. (2013). Intelligent diagnosis of asthma using machine learning algorithms. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 5, 140–145.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, K., Chin, N., & Lim, T. (2000). Asthma in the elderly-a more severe disease. Singapore Medical Journal, 41, 579–581.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Semic-Jusufagic, A., & Custovic, A. (2007). Active smoking among asthmatic youth—How concerned we need to be. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burke, W., Fesinmeyer, M., Reed, K., Hampson, L., & Carlsten, C. (2003). Family history as a predictor of asthma risk. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24, 160–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gong, J. H. (1990). Wheezing and Asthma. In W. D. H. H. Kenneth & J. Willis (Eds.), Clinical Methods: The History. Physical and Laboratory Examinations, Boston: Butterworth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kydd, R. M. (2010). Socioeconomic, environmental and personal correlates of asthma in a community population of men and women, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-06192010-034006.

  12. Gjevre, J. A., Hurst, T. S., Taylor-Gjevre, R. M., & Cockcroft, D. W. (2006). The American Thoracic Society’s spirometric criteria alone is inadequate in asthma diagnosis. Canadian Respiratory Journal, 13, 433–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gun, A. M., Gupta, M. K., & Dasgupta, B. (2008). Fundamentals of statistics. Kolkata: The World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Das, D. K., Chakraborty, C., Mitra, B., Maiti, A. K., & Ray, A. K. (2013). Quantitative microscopy approach for shape-based erythrocytes characterization in anaemia. Journal of Microscopy, 249, 136–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiu, C. H. (2009). Application of Back-propagation Neural network to categorization of physical fitness levels taiwanese females. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 31, 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (1999). Pattern classification. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, S. L., Li, X., Zhang, S., Gui, J., & Huang, D. S. (2010). Tumor classification by combining PNN classifier ensemble with neighborhood rough set based gene reduction. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 40, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Freund, Y. (2002) Alternating tree-based classifiers and methods for learning them, Google Patents.

  19. Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Kirkby, R., Frank, E., & Hall, M. (2002). Multiclass alternating decision trees. In 13th European Conference on Machine Learning.

  20. Freund, Y., & Mason, L. (1999). The alternating decision tree learning algorithm. Proceedings in ICML, 99, 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chakraborty, C., Mitra, T., Mukherjee, A., & Ray, A. K. (2009). CAIDSA: Computer-aided intelligent diagnostic system for bronchial asthma. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4958–4966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Burge, P., Pantin, C., Newton, D., Gannon, P., Bright, P., Belcher, J., et al. (1999). Development of an expert system for the interpretation of serial peak expiratory flow measurements in the diagnosis of occupational asthma. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56, 758–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are extremely thankful to the Department of Science & Technology, Government of India, for providing financial support under the Fast Track Scheme for Young Scientists to carry out this research (Ref. No. IIT/SRIC/SMST/SAA/2010-2013/29).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandan Chakraborty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, D.K., Chakraborty, C. & Bhattacharya, P.S. Automated Screening Methodology for Asthma Diagnosis that Ensembles Clinical and Spirometric Information. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 36, 420–429 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0137-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0137-9

Keywords

Navigation