A Clinical and Kinematical Evaluation of Trajectory Planning Software for Posterior Atlantoaxial Transarticular Screw Fixation Surgery
- 67 Downloads
Atlantoaxial instability is a progressive cervical spine condition that often requires surgical intervention. The posterior C1-2 transarticular fixation has been a great advancement for the management of atlantoaxial instability as it provides improved biomechanical stability. However, the surgical risks of serious neurovascular injury associated with this technique remain an obstacle for its wider adoption. The goal of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcome of C1-2 transarticular screw fixation utilizing a lab-designed trajectory planning software (TPS) system and to investigate the likely kinematical impact of deviated screw trajectory. The TPS system was applied to 19 patients (mean age: 61.1 years, range: 35–71 years; 14 males and 5 females) that underwent C1-2 transarticular fixation at our institution. A total of 32 transarticular screws were inserted. Pre-operative computed tomography images were used to render a three-dimensional bone tissue model as well as the corresponding multi-planar digitally reconstructed radiographs. The pre- and post-operative positions of C1 and C2 were also compared. Overall, only one malpositioned screw was identified and no major complications occurred for any of the patients. A comparison of the planned and actual screw insertion trajectories indicated that the vertical angle was the only parameter to have a statistically significant difference. Moderate negative correlation was found between the vertical entry point and the vertical angle, and moderate positive correlation was found between the horizontal entry point and the horizontal angle. The TPS system is a cost-effective clinical implementation that can potentially reduce the associated complication rates for C1-2 transarticular fixation. The system should be viewed as a useful assistive device as well as a potential training and auditing tool for institutions where more expensive navigational systems are not readily available.
KeywordsAtlantoaxial joint Computer-assisted surgery C1-2 transarticular screw fixation Posterior instrumentation Cervical spine
This study was supported by the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC 102-2622-b-002-003-CC2) and National Taiwan University, Taiwan (NTU 101R7101, 102R7101).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any personal or institutional financial interest in the drugs, materials, or devices described in this manuscript.
- 1.Sunahara, N., Matsunaga, S., Mori, T., Ijiri, K., & Sakou, T. (1997). Clinical course of conservatively managed rheumatoid arthritis patients with myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 22(22), 2603–2607; discussion 2608.Google Scholar
- 2.Matsunaga, S., Sakou, T., Onishi, T., Hayashi, K., Taketomi, E., Sunahara, N., et al. (2003). Prognosis of patients with upper cervical lesions caused by rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of occipitocervical fusion between C1 laminectomy and nonsurgical management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 28(14), 1581–1587; discussion 1587.Google Scholar
- 9.Jacobson, M. E., Khan, S. N., & An, H. S. (2012). C1-C2 posterior fixation: indications, technique, and results. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 43(1), 11–18, vii, doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2011.09.004.
- 14.Currier, B. L., Maus, T. P., Eck, J. C., Larson, D. R., & Yaszemski, M. J. (2008). Relationship of the internal carotid artery to the anterior aspect of the C1 vertebra: implications for C1-C2 transarticular and C1 lateral mass fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 33(6), 635–639. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318166e083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Weidner, A., Wahler, M., Chiu, S. T., & Ullrich, C. G. (2000). Modification of C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation by image-guided surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25(20), 2668–2673; discussion 2674.Google Scholar
- 20.Wright, N. M., & Lauryssen, C. (1998). Vertebral artery injury in C1-2 transarticular screw fixation: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Journal of Neurosurgery, 88(4), 634–640. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.4.0634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Yamazaki, M., Okawa, A., Furuya, T., Sakuma, T., Takahashi, H., Kato, K., et al. (2012). Anomalous vertebral arteries in the extra- and intraosseous regions of the craniovertebral junction visualized by 3-dimensional computed tomographic angiography: analysis of 100 consecutive surgical cases and review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 37(22), E1389–1397. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826a0c9f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Bolger, C., & Wigfield, C. (2000). Image-guided surgery: applications to the cervical and thoracic spine and a review of the first 120 procedures. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 92(2 Suppl), 175–180.Google Scholar
- 24.Kotani, Y., Abumiok, K., Ito, M., & Minami, A. (2003). Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. Journal of Neurosurgery, 99(3 Suppl), 257–263.Google Scholar