Automated Segmentation and Analysis of Corpus Callosum in Autistic MR Brain Images Using Fuzzy-c-Means-Based Level Set Method

  • A. R. Jac FredoEmail author
  • G. Kavitha
  • S. Ramakrishnan
Original Article


In this work, the segmentation and analysis of the corpus callosum (CC) in autistic MR brain images is carried out using a fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based level set method. Initially, the images are skull-stripped using the geodesic active contour method. The CC is extracted from the skull-stripped images using the FCM-based level set method. FCM clustering forms the initial contour. The evolution of the curve is then regularized using a distance function in the level sets. The segmented CC is divided into five segments, whose areas are measured. The subjective results show that the proposed method is able to extract the CC from skull-stripped images. It is demonstrated that the level set with the FCM as the initial contour gives better results than those obtained with a manual initial contour. It is found that the autistic subjects have a reduced CC area compared to that of control subjects. The total CC area of autistic subjects gives a correlation of R = 0.39 with the verbal intelligence quotient (IQ) values. Further analysis shows that the anterior third region of the CC gives significant discrimination of the control and autistic subjects compared to the other segments. Its correlation (R) with verbal IQ is found to be 0.27 in autistic subjects. The feature area extracted from the CC and its segments are significant, hence the results may be clinically helpful in the mass screening of autistic subjects.


Autism Corpus callosum Fuzzy c-means Level set Intelligence quotient 



The first author, A. R. Jac Fredo, is receiving a fellowship from Maulana Azad National Fellowship for Minority students (F1-17.1/2011/MANF-CHR-TAM-1826) for his research work.


  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association. (2001). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prigge, M. B. D., Lange, N., Bigler, E. D., Merkleyg, T. L., Neeley, E. S., Abildskov, T. J., et al. (2013). Corpus callosum area in children and adults with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yue, L., Mrinal, M., & Ahmed, S. N. (2013). Fully automated segmentation of corpus callosum in midsagittal brain MRIs. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Annual International Conference on Engineering Medicine Biology Society, (pp. 5111–5114).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qing, H., Kevin, K., & Duan, Y. (2008). Abnormalities in MRI traits of corpus callosum in autism subtype. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Annual International Conference on Engineering Medicine Biology Society, (pp. 3900–3903).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haiyan, Z., Jiafeng, L., Zixin, Z., & Haiyun, L. (2011). An automated and simple method for brain MR image extraction. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 10, 1–12.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shi, F., Wang, L., Dai, Y., Gilmore, J. H., Lin, W., & Shen, D. (2012). LABEL: Pediatric brain extraction using learning-based meta-algorithm. Neuroimage, 62, 1975–1986.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aly, A. F., Rachid, F., Manuel, F. C., Alaa, E. A., Hossam, A. E., Ayman, E. (2007). Robust neuroimaging based classification techniques of autistic vs. typically developing brain. Deformable models. Topics in Biomedical Engineering, (pp. 535–566). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hua, X., Thompson, P. M., Leow, A. D., Madsen, S. K., Caplan, R., Alger, J. R., et al. (2011). Brain growth rate abnormalities visualized in adolescents with autism. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 425–436.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boger-Megiddo, I., Shaw, D. W., Friedman, S. D., Sparks, B. F., Artru, A. A., Giedd, J. N., et al. (2006). Corpus callosum morphometrics in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 733–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frazier, T. W., Keshavan, M. S., Minshew, N. J., & Hardan, A. Y. (2012). A two-year longitudinal MRI study of the corpus callosum in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 2312–2322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Craig, M. C., Zaman, S. H., Daly, E. M., Cutter, W. J., Robertson, D. M., Hallahan, B., et al. (2007). Women with autistic-spectrum disorder: magnetic resonance imaging study of brain anatomy. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 224–228.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Christine, E., Cedric, G., Yue, F., Patrick, J., Michael, V., Meng-Chuan, L., et al. (2013). Brain surface anatomy in adults with autism: the relationship between surface area, cortical thickness, and autistic symptoms. JAMA Psychiatry, 70, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McAlonan, G. M., Cheung, V., Cheung, C., Suckling, J., Lam, G. Y., Tai, K. S., et al. (2005). Mapping the brain in autism: a voxel-based MRI study of volumetric differences and intercorrelations in autism. Brain, 128, 268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Geurts, H. M., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Scholte, H. S. (2013). The relationship between grey-matter and ASD and ADHD traits in typical adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1630–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, J. M., Yoon, U., Nam, S. H., Jung-Hyun, K., In-Young, K., & Kim, S. I. (2003). Evaluation of automated and semi-automated skull-stripping algorithms using similarity index and segmentation error. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 33, 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gui, L., Lisowski, R., Faundez, T., Hüppi, P. S., Lazeyras, F., & Kocher, M. (2012). Morphology driven automatic segmentation of MR images of the neonatal brain. Medical Image Analysis, 16, 1565–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rongjie, L., Yonggang, S., Nancy, S., Arthur, W. T. (2011). Automated corpus callosum extraction via Laplace–Beltrami nodal parcellation and intrinsic geodesic curvature flows on surfaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, (pp. 2034–2040).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ayman, E. B., Ahmed, E., Manuel, F. C., Georgy, G., Andrew, E. S., Desha, J., & Sabrina, R. (2011). Accurate automated detection of autism related corpus callosum abnormalities. Journal of Medical Systems, 35, 929–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Timothy, J. H., Xiaojian, K., & David, L. W. (2012). Automated measurement of the human corpus callosum using MRI. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 6, 1–15.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clement, V., Benjamin, Y., Kshamta, B., Rachel, G. S., Guido, G., Heather, C. H., Martin, S. (2012). Automatic corpus callosum segmentation using a deformable active Fourier contour model. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Imaging: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging, (pp. 1–15).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Padma, A., & Sukanesh, R. (2013). Combined texture feature analysis of segmentation and classification of benign and malignant tumour CT slices. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 37, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bhadauria, H. S., Singh, A., & Dewal, M. L. (2013). An integrated method for haemorrhage segmentation from brain CT imaging. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 39, 1527–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Antonio, Y. H., Melissa, P., Nidhi, G., Rahul, B., Nadine, M. M., Serguei, F., et al. (2009). Corpus callosum volume in children with autism. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 174, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Di Martino, A., Yan, C. G., Li, Q., Denio, E., Castellanos, F. X., Alaerts, K., et al. (2014). The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism. Molecular Psychiatry, 19, 659–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhua, W., Kang, S. H., & Birosc, G. (2013). A geodesic-active-contour-based variational model for short-axis cardiac MR image segmentation. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 1, 124–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chunming, L., Chenyang, X., Changfeng, G., Martin, D. F. (2005). Level set evolution without re-initialization: A new variational formulation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, (pp. 430–436).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Taiwanese Society of Biomedical Engineering 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics EngineeringAnna UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Non-Invasive Imaging and Diagnostics Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering Group, Department of Applied MechanicsIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations