Skip to main content
Log in

Schumpeter’s business cycle theory and the diversification argument

  • Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 12 January 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Schumpeter’s business cycle theory can be divided into three component parts: entrepreneurs produce innovations, innovations generate local plan failures, and local plan failures at times grow sufficiently large to generate global recessions. The third component of Schumpeter’s theory is susceptible to the diversification argument, i.e. small micro-changes tend to average out in a large economy thereby generating little macro-fluctuation. While Schumpeter was cognizant of this problem, he did not develop an explicit mechanism to nullify the averaging out of micro-changes. We argue that the network dynamics generated by Schumpeterian innovations is the missing link in his theory. More specifically, innovations change the production network by prodding firms to seek new suppliers of inputs and new buyers of output. These production network dynamics ensure that micro-changes are not independent of each other, rather micro-changes occur in response to each other, thereby nullifying the diversification argument. Production network dynamics are capable of transforming micro-flux into macro-turbulence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. In so far as thought can be thought to be contained with geographical or historical boundaries.

References

  • Acemoglu D, Carvalho VM, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2012) The network origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 80(5):1977–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2017) Microeconomic origins of macroeconomic tail risks. Am Econ Rev 107(1):54–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alan K (2016) Networks: a paradigm shift for economics? The Oxford handbook of the economics of networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 13–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Atalay E, Hortacsu A, Roberts J, Syverson C (2011) Network structure of production. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(13):5199–5202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axtell RL (2001) Zipf distribution of US firm sizes. Science 293(5536):1818–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axtell R, Guerrero O, López E (2019) Frictional unemployment on labor flow networks. J Econ Behav Organ 160:184–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrot J-N, Sauvagnat J (2016) Input specificity and the propagation of idiosyncratic shocks in production networks. Q J Econ 131(3):1543–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1996) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. J Bus Ventur 11(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho VM (2014) From micro to macro via production networks. J Econ Perspect 28(4):23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G, Fagiolo G, Roventini A (2010) Schumpeter meeting Keynes: a policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles. J Econ Dyn Control 34(9):1748–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallick B, Fleischman CA (2004) “Employer-to-employer flows in the US labor market: the complete picture of gross worker flows.” Finance and Economics Discussion Series No. 2004-34, Federal Reserve

  • Gabaix X (2011) The granular origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 79(3):733–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin RM (1991) Schumpeter, Keynes and the theory of economic evolution. J Evolut Econ 1(1):29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann H (2003) Schumpeter’s early contributions on crisis theory and business-cycle theory. Hist Econ Ideas 11(1):47–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1948) The meaning of competition. Individualism and economic order. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 92–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA, Johnsen S (1991) Coevolution to the edge of chaos: coupled fitness landscapes, poised states, and coevolutionary avalanches. J Theor Biol 149(4):467–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy A (1936) The great chain of being. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1977) Understanding business cycles. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 5:7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1997) Fractals and scaling in finance. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky H (1986) Stabilizing an unstable economy. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips BD, Kirchhoff BA (1989) Formation, growth and survival: small firm dynamics in the US economy. Small Bus Econ 1(1):65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheinkman JA, Woodford M (1994) Self-organized criticality and economic fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 84(2):417–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1927) The explanation of business cycle. Economica 21:286–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1928) The instability of capitalism. Econ J 38(151):361–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p 1983 (Reprinted by Transaction Publishers in)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1935) The analysis of economic change. Rev Econ Stat 17(4):2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1939) Business cycles: a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process, vol 1. McGraw-Hill, New York (Reprinted in 2005 by Bartleby’s Books (Chevy Chase, MD) and Martino Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1946) The decade of the twenties. Am Econ Rev 36(2):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (2010) Development by Joseph A Schumpeter. J Econ Lit 43:112–120 (translated by Markus C. Becker and Thorbjorn Knudsen)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle GL (1972) Epistemics and economics: a critique of economic doctrines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RE (2010) Mind, society, and human action: time and knowledge in a theory of social-economy. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RE (2020) Macroeconomics as systems theory: transcending the micro-macro dichotomy. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vipin P. Veetil.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veetil, V.P. Schumpeter’s business cycle theory and the diversification argument. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 18, 273–288 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-020-00190-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-020-00190-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation