Advertisement

A comparative analysis of export growth in Turkey and China through macroeconomic and institutional factors

  • Emre Ünal
Article

Abstract

The Turkish economy became more stable in the period of 2003–2011 compared with the period of 1985–2003, because the economic crisis that emerged in the 2000–2001 period forced the country to undertake institutional changes. Thus, it could reduce the severe inflation and the volatility of the lira. The Turkish economy gained relative stability. However, this performance is not sufficient for Turkey to become a strong competitive power, compared with the Chinese economy. China linked its wage growth to the productivity growth of non-tradable goods by following export-led growth strategies in the 1990s that contributed to its trade surplus, but Turkey kept wage growth at above the productivity growth of export goods, which reduced its competitive power and deepened its trade deficit. Therefore, Turkey must decrease its wage growth to the productivity growth of non-tradable goods and reduce overvaluation of the lira. To accomplish these goals, Turkey must undertake new institutional changes in its wage–labor relations repress on its wage growth and must transform the floating exchange rate system into the managed exchange rate system by considering policies for its undervalued currency. In other words, Turkey must restrain extensive labor rights related to unionization and collective bargaining and must control the exchange rate to support export-led growth.

Keywords

Export-led growth Macroeconomic factors Purchasing power parity (PPP) Undervalued currency Overvalued currency Institutional factors 

JEL Classification

E2 F5 O4 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Prof. Dr. Hiroyuki Uni for his helpful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Aglietta M (1979) A theory of capitalist regulation: the US experience (trans: Fernbach D). Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrighi G (2009) Adam Smith in Beijing: lineages of the 21st century. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyer R (1990) The Regulation School: a critical introduction (trans: Charney C). Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyer R, Saillard Y (2002) A summary of regulation theory. In: Boyer R, Saillard Y (eds) Régulation theory: the state of the art (trans: Shread C). Routledge, London, pp. 36–44Google Scholar
  5. Boyer R, Hollingsworth JR (1997) The variety of institutional arrangements and their complementarity in modern economies. In: Boyer R, Hollingsworth JR (eds) Contemporary capitalism: the embeddedness of institutions. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassel G (1918) Abnormal deviations in international exchanges. Econ J 28(112):413–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deyo FC (2012) Reforming Asian labor systems: economic tensions and worker dissent. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  8. Dornbusch R (1985) Purchasing power parity. Working paper no. 1591. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/jfrankel/ITF-220/readings/Dornbush-PPP-NBERWP1591.pdf. Accessed 25 Dec 2015 
  9. Frankel J, Wei SJ (2007) Assessing China’s exchange rate regime. Paper was prepared for the 44th panel meeting of economic policy. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/papers/j.frankel_AssessingRMB4-6-07cbg.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2007
  10. Görmez Y, Yılmaz G (2007) The evolution of exchange rate regime choices in Turkey. Second Conference of the South-Eastern European Monetary History Network. http://www.oenb.at/dms/oenb/Publikationen/Volkswirtschaft/Workshops/2008/Workshop-No.-13/chapters/goermez_tcm16-80922.pdf. Accessed 25 Dec 2015
  11. Guo R (2010) An introduction to the Chinese economy: the driving forces, behind modern day China. Wiley, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey D (2011) The enigma of capitalism and the crises of capitalism. Profile Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. He D, Zhang W, Han G, Wu T (2012) Productivity growth of the non-tradable sectors in China, Hong Kong Monetary Authority. http://www.hkimr.org/uploads/conference_detail/19/con_paper_0_1075_wenlang-zhang.pdf. Accessed 25 Dec 2015
  14. Hicks J (1989) A market theory of money. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jessop B (2006) Fordism ad post-Fordism. In: Jessop B, Sum NL (eds) Beyond the regulation approach: putting capitalist economies in their place. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 58–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kenen PB (1996) Analyzing and managing exchange rate crises. Open Econ Rev 7:469–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee HC (2009) Industrial relation and collective bargaining in China. Working paper no. 7, Industrial and Employment Relations Department, ILOGoogle Scholar
  18. Li M (2008) The rise of China and the demise of the capitalist world-economy. Pluto Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Lutze TD (2011) Post-socialist capitalism in rural China. In: Lynch C, Marks RB, Pickowicz PG (eds) Radicalism, revolution, and reform in modern China: essay in honor of Maurice Meisner. Lexington Books, Lanham, pp 133–160Google Scholar
  20. McKinnon R (2005) Exchange rate or wage changes in international adjustments? Japan and China versus the United States. Discussion paper series 103. http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/workp/swp05007.pdf. Accessed 25 Dec 2015
  21. Mihaljek D, Klau M (2004) The Balassa-Samuelson effect in Central Europe: a disaggregated analysis. Comp Econ Stud 46:63–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Naughton B (2007) The Chinese economy: transition and growth. The MIT Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Pamuk Ş (2009) Economic change in twenty-century Turkey: is the glass more than half full? In: Kasaba R (ed) The Cambridge history of Turkey Volume 4: Turkey in modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 266–300Google Scholar
  24. Pasinetti LL (1993) Structural economic dynamics: a theory of the economic consequences of human learning. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shen J (2007) Labour disputes and their resolution in China. Chandos Publishing, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Uni H (2007) Export-biased productivity increase and exchange rate regime in East Asia and Europe. Kyoto Econ Rev 76(1):117–138Google Scholar
  27. Uni H (2012) Comparative analysis of conditions for monetary integration: Europe and Asia. In: Boyer R, Uemura H, Isogai A (eds) Diversity and transformations of Asian capitalism. Routledge, New York, pp 287–305Google Scholar
  28. Yan C (2012) Analysis of the linkage effect in Chinese export- led growth; according to the subdivisions of Asian international input–output tables. In: Boyer R, Uemura H, Isogai A (eds) Diversity and transformations of Asian capitalism. Routledge, New York, pp 165–182Google Scholar
  29. Yan C (2014) Structural changes in the labor market and social security system in China: from the viewpoint of flexicurity. Discussion paper no. E-14-005, Research Project Center, Kyoto UniversityGoogle Scholar
  30. Yeldan E, Ercan H (2011) Growth, employment policies and economic linkages: Turkey. Employment sector, Employment working paper 84, ILOGoogle Scholar
  31. Yi G (2013) Exchange rate arrangement: flexible and fixed exchange rate debate revisited. Paper presented at the rethinking macro policy II: first steps and early lessons conference hosted by the International Monetary Fund, Washington DC. https://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2013/macro2/pdf/gy.pdf. Accessed 25 Dec 2015

Copyright information

© Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EconomicsKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations