Abstract
Large-scale production of polyethylene in industry requires efficient elimination of the trace amount of acetylene impurity. Currently, zeolite adsorption or the conversion of acetylene to ethylene via selective semi-hydrogenation on Pd catalysts is the commonly used method. In this work, we investigate the reaction mechanisms of acetylene hydrogenation on defective graphene (DG) supported single-atom catalysts (SACs), M1/SV-G and M1/DV-G (M=Ni, Pd and Pt) using density functional theory (DFT), where SV-G and DV-G represent DG with single and double vacancies, respectively. It is shown that the metal single-atoms (SAs) as well as their different coordination numbers both affect the activity and selectivity of the hydrogenation process. M1/DV-G provides better H2 dissociation ability than M1/SV-G, which accounts for the poor acetylene hydrogenation activity of M1/SV-G. Based on the reaction barriers, Pt1/DV-G and Ni1/DV-G are better catalysts than other systems considered here, with Ni1/DV-G exhibiting high selectivity for the semi-hydrogenation product of acetylene. These results provide insights for the design of highly selective and noble-metal-free SACs for acetylene hydrogenation on carbon materials.
摘要
在工业上批量生产聚乙烯的过程中去除痕量乙炔杂质的常用方法是沸石吸附或钯基催化剂选择性半氢化乙炔生成乙烯. 本文通过密度泛函理论研究了乙炔在缺陷石墨烯负载的单原子催化剂M1/SV-G和M1/DV-G (其中M=Ni, Pd, Pt; SV-G, DV-G分别代表具有单碳缺陷和双碳缺陷的石墨烯)表面上加氢转化为乙烯的反应机理. 研究表明, 金属单原子及其配位环境均会影响加氢过程的活性和选择性. M1/DV-G催化剂比M1/SV-G具有更好的氢分子解离能力, 这是因为M1/DV-G具有较强的乙炔氢化能力. 基于计算得到的加氢能垒, Pt1/DV-G和Ni1/DV-G的催化活性明显优于其他催化剂, 其中Ni1/DV-G催化剂还具有高的乙炔半加氢选择性. 本研究结果为设计以碳材料为载体的、 具有高选择性的非贵金属单原子乙炔氢化催化剂提供了理论基础.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borodziński A, Bond GC. Selective hydrogenation of ethyne in ethene-rich streams on palladium catalysts. Part 1. Effect of changes to the catalyst during reaction. Catal Rev, 2006, 48: 91–144
Borodziński A, Bond GC. Selective hydrogenation of ethyne in ethane-rich streams on palladium catalysts. Part 2: Steady-state kinetics and effects of palladium particle size, carbon monoxide, and promoters. Catal Rev, 2008, 50: 379–469
Vilé G, Albani D, Almora-Barrios N, et al. Advances in the design of nanostructured catalysts for selective hydrogenation. ChemCatChem, 2016, 8: 21–33
Mueller WM, Blackledge JP, Libowitz GG. Metal Hydrides. New York, London: Academic Press, 1968
Armbrüster M, Behrens M, Cinquini F, et al. How to control the selectivity of palladium-based catalysts in hydrogenation reactions: The role of subsurface chemistry. ChemCatChem, 2012, 4: 1048–1063
Teschner D, Borsodi J, Wootsch A, et al. The roles of subsurface carbon and hydrogen in palladium-catalyzed alkyne hydrogenation. Science, 2008, 320: 86–89
Studt F, Abild-Pedersen F, Bligaard T, et al. On the role of surface modifications of palladium catalysts in the selective hydrogenation of acetylene. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2008, 47: 9299–9302
Yang B, Burch R, Hardacre C, et al. Influence of surface structures, subsurface carbon and hydrogen, and surface alloying on the activity and selectivity of acetylene hydrogenation on Pd surfaces: A density functional theory study. J Catal, 2013, 305: 264–276
Michaelides A, Hu P, Alavi A. Physical origin of the high reactivity of subsurface hydrogen in catalytic hydrogenation. J Chem Phys, 1999, 111: 1343–1345
Ledentu V, Dong W, Sautet P. Heterogeneous catalysis through subsurface sites. J Am Chem Soc, 2000, 122: 1796–1801
Haug KL, Bürgi T, Trautman TR, et al. Distinctive reactivities of surface-bound H and bulk H for the catalytic hydrogenation of acetylene. J Am Chem Soc, 1998, 120: 8885–8886
Tew MW, Miller JT, van Bokhoven JA. Particle size effect of hydride formation and surface hydrogen adsorption of nanosized palladium catalysts: L3 edge vs. K edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C, 2009, 113: 15140–15147
Sárkány A, Weiss AH, Guczi L. Structure sensitivity of acetylene-ethylene hydrogenation over Pd catalysts. J Catal, 1986, 98: 550–553
Aben P. Palladium areas in supported catalysts: Determination of palladium surface areas in supported catalysts by means of hydrogen chemisorption. J Catal, 1968, 10: 224–229
Qiao B, Wang A, Yang X, et al. Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt1/FeOx. Nat Chem, 2011, 3: 634–641
Yang XF, Wang A, Qiao B, et al. Single-atom catalysts: A new frontier in heterogeneous catalysis. Acc Chem Res, 2013, 46: 1740–1748
Liang S, Hao C, Shi Y. The power of single-atom catalysis. ChemCatChem, 2015, 7: 2559–2567
Liu J. Catalysis by supported single metal atoms. ACS Catal, 2017, 7: 34–59
Liang JX, Wang YG, Yang XF, et al. Recent advances in singleatom catalysis. Encyclop Inorga Bioinorg Chem, 2017, 1–11
Liu JC, Tang Y, Wang YG, et al. Theoretical understanding of the stability of single-atom catalysts. Natl Sci Rev, 2018, 5: 638–641
Wang A, Li J, Zhang T. Heterogeneous single-atom catalysis. Nat Rev Chem, 2018, 2: 65–81
Talib SH, Yu X, Yu Q, et al. Non-noble metal single-atom catalysts with phosphotungstic acid (PTA) support: A theoretical study of ethylene epoxidation. Sci China Mater, 2020, 63: 1003–1014
Harrath K, Yu X, Xiao H, et al. The key role of support surface hydrogenation in the CH4 to CH3OH selective oxidation by a ZrO2-supported single-atom catalyst. ACS Catal, 2019, 9: 8903–8909
Baskaran S, Xu CQ, Wang YG, et al. Catalytic mechanism and bonding analyses of Au-Pd single atom alloy (SAA): CO oxidation reaction. Sci China Mater, 2020, 63: 993–1002
Kyriakou G, Boucher MB, Jewell AD, et al. Isolated metal atom geometries as a strategy for selective heterogeneous hydrogenations. Science, 2012, 335: 1209–1212
Pei GX, Liu XY, Wang A, et al. Promotional effect of Pd single atoms on Au nanoparticles supported on silica for the selective hydrogenation of acetylene in excess ethylene. New J Chem, 2014, 38: 2043–2051
Pei GX, Liu XY, Wang A, et al. Ag alloyed Pd single-atom catalysts for efficient selective hydrogenation of acetylene to ethylene in excess ethylene. ACS Catal, 2015, 5: 3717–3725
Liu D. DFT study of selective hydrogenation of acetylene to ethylene on Pd doping Ag nanoclusters. Appl Surf Sci, 2016, 386: 125–137
Sheth PA, Neurock M, Smith CM. First-principles analysis of the effects of alloying Pd with Ag for the catalytic hydrogenation of acetylene-ethylene mixtures. J Phys Chem B, 2005, 109: 12449–12466
Zhou H, Yang X, Li L, et al. PdZn intermetallic nanostructure with Pd-Zn-Pd ensembles for highly active and chemoselective semihydrogenation of acetylene. ACS Catal, 2016, 6: 1054–1061
Feng Q, Zhao S, Wang Y, et al. Isolated single-atom Pd sites in intermetallic nanostructures: High catalytic selectivity for semihydrogenation of alkynes. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139: 7294–7301
Vilé G, Albani D, Nachtegaal M, et al. A stable single-site palladium catalyst for hydrogenations. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2015, 54: 11265–11269
Huang X, Xia Y, Cao Y, et al. Enhancing both selectivity and coking-resistance of a single-atom Pd1/C3N4 catalyst for acetylene hydrogenation. Nano Res, 2017, 10: 1302–1312
Wilde M, Fukutani K, Ludwig W, et al. Influence of carbon deposition on the hydrogen distribution in Pd nanoparticles and their reactivity in olefin hydrogenation. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2008, 47: 9289–9293
Tew MW, Janousch M, Huthwelker T, et al. The roles of carbide and hydride in oxide-supported palladium nanoparticles for alkyne hydrogenation. J Catal, 2011, 283: 45–54
Teschner D, Vass E, Havecker M, et al. Alkyne hydrogenation over Pd catalysts: A new paradigm. J Catal, 2006, 242: 26–37
Yan H, Cheng H, Yi H, et al. Single-atom Pd1/graphene catalyst achieved by atomic layer deposition: Remarkable performance in selective hydrogenation of 1,3-butadiene. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137: 10484–10487
Huang F, Deng Y, Chen Y, et al. Atomically dispersed Pd on nanodiamond/graphene hybrid for selective hydrogenation of acetylene. J Am Chem Soc, 2018, 140: 13142–13146
Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54: 11169–11186
Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci, 1996, 6: 15–50
Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 77: 3865–3868
Bader RFW. A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications. Chem Rev, 1991, 91: 893–928
Jónsson H, Mills G, Jacobsen KW. Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions. In: Berne BJ, Ciccotti G, Coker DF (EDs.). Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations. Singapore, New Jersey, London, Hong Kong: World Scientific, 1998. 385–404
Henkelman G, Uberuaga BP, Jónsson H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J Chem Phys, 2000, 113: 9901–9904
Henkelman G, Jónsson H. Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points. J Chem Phys, 2000, 113: 9978–9985
Sargolzaei M, Gudarzi F. Magnetic properties of single 3d transition metals adsorbed on graphene and benzene: A density functional theory study. J Appl Phys, 2011, 110: 064303
Krasheninnikov AV, Lehtinen PO, Foster AS, et al. Embedding transition-metal atoms in graphene: Structure, bonding, and magnetism. Phys Rev Lett, 2009, 102: 126807
Santos EJG, Ayuela A, Sánchez-Portal D. First-principles study of substitutional metal impurities in graphene: Structural, electronic and magnetic properties. New J Phys, 2010, 12: 053012
Tang Y, Yang Z, Dai X. Trapping of metal atoms in the defects on graphene. J Chem Phys, 2011, 135: 224704
Xie PY, Zhang GL, Lv YA, et al. Enhanced bonding between noble metal adatoms and graphene with point defects. Acta Phys-Chim Sin, 2012, 28: 331–337
Ning Z, Chen Z, Du X, et al. Structural stability, electronic and magnetic properties of Cu adsorption on defected graphene: A first principles study. J Supercond Nov Magn, 2013, 27: 115–120
Wang L, Luo Q, Zhang W, et al. Transition metal atom embedded graphene for capturing CO: A first-principles study. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39: 20190–20196
Yan H, Zhao X, Guo N, et al. Atomic engineering of high-density isolated Co atoms on graphene with proximal-atom controlled reaction selectivity. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 3197
Jia TT, Lu CH, Zhang YF, et al. A comparative study of CO catalytic oxidation on Pd-anchored graphene oxide and Pd-embedded vacancy graphene. J Nanopart Res, 2014, 16: 2206
Liu X, Sui Y, Duan T, et al. CO oxidation catalyzed by Ptembedded graphene: A first-principles investigation. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2014, 16: 23584–23593
Johll H, Kang HC, Tok ES. Density functional theory study of Fe, Co, and Ni adatoms and dimers adsorbed on graphene. Phys Rev B, 2009, 79: 245416
Back S, Lim J, Kim NY, et al. Single-atom catalysts for CO2 electroreduction with significant activity and selectivity improvements. Chem Sci, 2017, 8: 1090–1096
Xu H, Cheng D, Cao D, et al. A universal principle for a rational design of single-atom electrocatalysts. Nat Catal, 2018, 1: 339–348
Li XF, Li QK, Cheng J, et al. Conversion of dinitrogen to ammonia by FeN3-embedded graphene. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138: 8706–8709
Xi Y, Heyden A. Direct oxidation of methane to methanol enabled by electronic atomic monolayer-metal support interaction. ACS Catal, 2019, 9: 6073–6079
Yang B, Burch R, Hardacre C, et al. Origin of the increase of activity and selectivity of nickel doped by Au, Ag, and Cu for acetylene hydrogenation. ACS Catal, 2012, 2: 1027–1032
Medlin JW, Allendorf MD. Theoretical study of the adsorption of acetylene on the (111) surfaces of Pd, Pt, Ni, and Rh. J Phys Chem B, 2003, 107: 217–223
Zhang L, Ren Y, Liu W, et al. Single-atom catalyst: A rising star for green synthesis of fine chemicals. Natl Sci Rev, 2018, 5: 653–672
Xu CQ, Xing DH, Xiao H, et al. Manipulating stabilities and catalytic properties of trinuclear metal clusters through tuning the chemical bonding: H2 adsorption and activation. J Phys Chem C, 2017, 121: 10992–11001
Watson GW, Wells RPK, Willock DJ, et al. A comparison of the adsorption and diffusion of hydrogen on the {111} surfaces of Ni, Pd, and Pt from density functional theory calculations. J Phys Chem B, 2001, 105: 4889–4894
Tolbert MA, Beauchamp JL. Homolytic and heterolytic bond dissociation energies of the second row group 8, 9, and 10 diatomic transition-metal hydrides: Correlation with electronic structure. J Phys Chem, 1986, 90: 5015–5022
Pearson RG. The transition-metal-hydrogen bond. Chem Rev, 1985, 85: 41–49
Evans MG, Polanyi M. Inertia and driving force of chemical reactions. Trans Faraday Soc, 1938, 34: 11–24
Horiuti I, Polanyi M. Exchange reactions of hydrogen on metallic catalysts. Trans Faraday Soc, 1934, 30: 1164–1172
Shang C, Liu ZP. Origin and activity of gold nanoparticles as aerobic oxidation catalysts in aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc, 2011, 133: 9938–9947
Kozuch S, Shaik S. How to conceptualize catalytic cycles? The energetic span model. Acc Chem Res, 2010, 44: 101–110
Kozuch S, Shaik S. A combined kinetic-quantum mechanical model for assessment of catalytic cycles: Application to cross-coupling and heck reactions. J Am Chem Soc, 2006, 128: 3355–3365
Kozuch S. Steady state kinetics of any catalytic network: Graph theory, the energy span model, the analogy between catalysis and electrical circuits, and the meaning of “mechanism”. ACS Catal, 2015, 5: 5242–5255
Yang K, Yang B. Surface restructuring of Cu-based single-atom alloy catalysts under reaction conditions: The essential role of adsorbates. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2017, 19: 18010–18017
Ren S, Yu Q, Yu X, et al. Graphene-supported metal single-atom catalysts: A concise review. Sci China Mater, 2020, 63: 903–920
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21573286, 21173269, 21576288, U1662104, 21590792 and 91645203), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2015AA034603), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20130007110003), the Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (2462015YQ0304), and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Catalysis (2020B121201002). The calculations were performed using supercomputers at SUSTech Supercomputer Center and Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author contributions Li J conceived the project; Zhuo HY and Yu X performed the calculations; Zhuo HY and Xiao H wrote the paper; Yu XH, Yu Q, Xiao H, Zhang X and Li J revised the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Hong-Ying Zhuo is currently a PhD candidate in Prof. Xin Zhang’s group at China University of Petroleum-Beijing. She got her BSc degree in applied chemistry from Yantai University in 2011, and MSc degree in physical chemistry in 2015. Now, she is also a visiting student in Prof. Jun Li’s group, Tsinghua University (Beijing, China). Her current research interests focus on heterogeneous catalysis through theoretical methods.
Hai Xiao received his PhD degree from California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in 2015. He then continued to work at Caltech as a postdoctoral scholar and later a research scientist from 2015 to 2018. He is now an associate professor at Tsinghua University, and his research interest focuses on the fields of computational chemistry, catalysis and materials science.
Xin Zhang has received his PhD degree in 2006 from Tsinghua University. During 2007–2008, he joined Prof. Avelino Corma Canos’ group at the Instituto de Tecnología Química, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia in Spain (UPV-ITQ) as a postdoctoral fellow. In 2009, he started to work as a professor in the College of Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, China. His research focuses on the synthesis, characterization, and catalytic performance of catalysts with novel-structures.
Supporting information for
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhuo, HY., Yu, X., Yu, Q. et al. Selective hydrogenation of acetylene on graphene-supported non-noble metal single-atom catalysts. Sci. China Mater. 63, 1741–1749 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-020-1426-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-020-1426-0