Skip to main content
Log in

Long life rechargeable Li-O2 batteries enabled by enhanced charge transfer in nanocable-like Fe@N-doped carbon nanotube catalyst

用于长寿命锂-空气二次电池的铁-碳纳米管纳米电缆结构电化学催化剂及其电荷迁移增强机制

  • Published:
Science China Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rechargeable Li-O2 batteries have attracted considerable interests because of their exceptional energy density. However, the short lifetime still remained as one of the bottle-neck obstacles for the practical application of rechargeable Li-O2 batteries. The development of efficient cathode catalyst is highly desirable to reduce the energy barrier of Li-O2 reaction and electrode failure. In this work, we report a facile strategy for the fabrication of a high-performance cathode catalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries by the encapsulation of high content of active Fe nanorods into N-doped carbon nanotubes with high stability (denoted as Fe@NCNTs). First-principles calculations reveal that the synergistic charge transfer and redistribution between the interface of Fe nanorods, the CNT walls and the active N dopants greatly facilitate the chemisorption and subsequent dissociation of O2 molecules into the epoxy intermediates on the carbon surface, which benefits the uniform growth of nanosized discharge products on CNT surface and thus boosts the reversibility of Li-O2 reactions. As a result, the cathode with Fe@NCNT catalyst exhibits long cycling stability with high capacities (1000 mA h g−1 for 160 cycles and 600 mA h g−1 for 270 cycles). Based on the total mass of Fe@NCNTs + Li2O2, high gravimetric energy densities of 2120–2600 W h kg−1 can be achieved at the power densities of 50–795 W kg−1.

摘要

锂-空气二次电池是当前能量密度最高的二次电池体系之一, 高效阴极催化剂的创制构筑是构筑高性能锂-空气电池的关键技术之一. 本文基于简便易行的全固相热解反应, 设计构筑了一种具有纳米电缆结构的新型铁-碳纳米管电化学催化剂. 第一性原理计算表明碳纳米 管与其内部包覆的铁纳米棒之间的电荷迁移与协同分布效应可有效促进氧气在碳纳米管表面的化学吸附与转化. 得益于此, 基于其的锂- 空气电池在限制比容量为600 mA h g−1时, 循环寿命可达270次, 基于此催化剂与固态放电产物(Li2O2)总质量的电极比能量可达2120–2600 W h kg−1. 本研究为锂-空气二次电池用高性能阴极催化剂的开发提供了有效途径.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Girishkumar G, McCloskey B, Luntz AC, et al. Lithium-air battery: promise and challenges. J Phys Chem Lett, 2010, 1: 2193–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Black R, Adams B, Nazar LF.Non-aqueous and hybrid Li-O2 batteries. Adv Energ Mater, 2012, 2: 801–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jung HG, Hassoun J, Park JB, et al. An improved high-performance lithium–air battery. Nat Chem, 2012, 4: 579–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng F, Chen J. Metal–air batteries: from oxygen reduction electrochemistry to cathode catalysts. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41: 2172–2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park M, Sun H, Lee H, et al. Lithium-air batteries: survey on the current status and perspectives towards automotive applications from a battery industry standpoint. Adv Energ Mater, 2012, 2: 780–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kraytsberg A, Ein-Eli Y. Review on Li–air batteries—opportunities, limitations and perspective. J Power Sources, 2011, 196: 886–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng Z, Freunberger SA, Chen Y, et al. A reversible and higher-rate Li-O2 battery. Science, 2012, 337: 563–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Freunberger SA, Chen Y, Drewett NE, et al. The lithium-oxygen battery with ether-based electrolytes. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2011, 50: 8609–8613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McCloskey BD, Speidel A, Scheffler R, et al. Twin problems of interfacial carbonate formation in nonaqueous Li–O2 batteries. J Phys Chem Lett, 2012, 3: 997–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McCloskey BD, Scheffler R, Speidel A, et al. On the efficacy of electrocatalysis in nonaqueous Li–O2 batteries. J Am Chem Soc, 2011, 133: 18038–18041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Y, Freunberger SA, Peng Z, et al. Li–O2 battery with a dimethylformamide electrolyte. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134: 7952–7957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu YC, Shao-Horn Y. Probing the reaction kinetics of the charge reactions of nonaqueous Li–O2 batteries. J Phys Chem Lett, 2013, 4: 93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McCloskey BD, Bethune DS, Shelby RM, et al. Solvents’ critical role in nonaqueous lithium–oxygen battery electrochemistry. J Phys Chem Lett, 2011, 2: 1161–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abraham KM.A polymer electrolyte-based rechargeable lithium/oxygen battery. J Electrochem Soc, 1996, 143: 1–5

  15. Lu YC, Xu Z, Gasteiger HA, et al. Platinum-gold nanoparticles: a highly active bifunctional electrocatalyst for rechargeable lithium-air batteries. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132: 12170–12171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu YC, Gallant BM, Kwabi DG, et al. Lithium–oxygen batteries: bridgingmechanistic understanding and battery performance. Energ Environ Sci, 2013, 6: 750–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Black R, Lee JH, Adams B, et al. The role of catalysts and peroxide oxidation in lithium-oxygen batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013, 52: 392–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oh SH, Black R, Pomerantseva E, et al. Synthesis of a metallic mesoporous pyrochlore as a catalyst for lithium–O2 batteries. Nat Chem, 2012, 4: 1004–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hummelshøj JS, Luntz AC, Nørskov JK.Theoretical evidence for low kinetic overpotentials in Li-O2 electrochemistry. J Chem Phys, 2013, 138: 034703–034703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu S, Wang Z, Yu C, et al. Free-standing, hierarchically porous carbon nanotube film as a binder-free electrode for high-energy Li–O2 batteries. J Mater Chem A, 2013, 1: 12033–12037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao C, Yu C, Liu S, et al. 3D porous N-doped graphene frameworks made of interconnected nanocages for ultrahigh-rate and long-life Li-O2 batteries. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 6913–6920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitchell RR, Gallant BM, Thompson CV, et al. All-carbon- nanofiber electrodes for high-energy rechargeable Li–O2 batteries. Energ Environ Sci, 2011, 4: 2952–2958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu T, Xu JJ, Liu QC, et al. Ultrathin, lightweight, and wearable Li-O2 battery with high robustness and gravimetric/volumetric energy density. Small, 2017, 13: 1602952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu QC, Xu JJ, Xu D, et al. Flexible lithium–oxygen battery based on a recoverable cathode. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 7892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu JJ, Wang ZL, Xu D, et al. 3D ordered macroporous LaFeO3 as efficient electrocatalyst for Li–O2 batteries with enhanced rate capability and cyclic performance. Energ Environ Sci, 2014, 7: 2213–2219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yin YB, Xu JJ, Liu QC, et al. Macroporous interconnected hollow carbon nanofibers inspired by golden-toad eggs toward a binder-free, high-rate, and flexible electrode. AdvMater, 2016, 28: 7494–7500

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chang Z, Xu J, Liu Q, et al. Recent progress on stability enhancement for cathode in rechargeable non-aqueous lithium-oxygen battery. Adv Energ Mater, 2015, 5: 1500633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guo Z, Zhou D, Dong XL, et al. Ordered hierarchical mesoporous/ macroporous carbon: a high-performance catalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 5668–5672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang X, He P, Xia Y. Preparation of mesocellular carbon foam and its application for lithium/oxygen battery. Electrochem Commun, 2009, 11: 1127–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xiao J, Mei D, Li X, et al. Hierarchically porous graphene as a lithium–air battery electrode. Nano Lett, 2011, 11: 5071–5078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Oh SH, Nazar LF.Oxide catalysts for rechargeable high-capacity Li-O2 batteries. Adv Energ Mater, 2012, 2: 903–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu JJ, Xu D, Wang ZL, et al. Synthesis of perovskite-based porous La0.75Sr0.25MnO3 nanotubes as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for rechargeable lithium-oxygen batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013, 52: 3887–3890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kwak WJ, Lau KC, Shin CD, et al. A Mo2C/carbon nanotube composite cathode for lithium–oxygen batteries with high energy efficiency and long cycle life. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 4129–4137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li Q, Xu P, Gao W, et al. Graphene/graphene-tube nanocomposites templated from cage-containing metal-organic frameworks for oxygen reduction in Li-O2 batteries. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 1378–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shui J, Du F, Xue C, et al. Vertically aligned n-doped coral-like carbon fiber arrays as efficient air electrodes for high-performance nonaqueous Li–O2 batteries. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 3015–3022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang H, Yang Y, Liang Y, et al. Rechargeable Li–O2 batteries with a covalently coupled MnCo2O4–graphene hybrid as an oxygen cathode catalyst. Energ Environ Sci, 2012, 5: 7931–7935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jian Z, Liu P, Li F, et al. Core-shell-structuredCNT@RuO2 composite as a high-performance cathode catalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53: 442–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu JJ, Wang ZL, Xu D, et al. Tailoring deposition and morphology of discharge products towards high-rate and long-life lithium-oxygen batteries. Nat Commun, 2013, 4: 2438

    Google Scholar 

  39. Guo D, Shibuya R, Akiba C, et al. Active sites of nitrogen-doped carbon materials for oxygen reduction reaction clarified using model catalysts. Science, 2016, 351: 361–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hou Y, Huang T, Wen Z, et al. Metal-organic framework-derived nitrogen-doped core-shell-structured porous Fe/Fe3C@C nanoboxes supported on graphene sheets for efficient oxygen reduction reactions. Adv Energ Mater, 2014, 4: 1400337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jin H, Wang J, Su D, et al. In situ cobalt–cobalt oxide/N-doped carbon hybrids as superior bifunctional electrocatalysts for hydrogen and oxygen evolution. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137: 2688–2694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang J, Zhao Z, Xia Z, et al. A metal-free bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions. Nat Nanotech, 2015, 10: 444–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mitchell RR, Gallant BM, Shao-Horn Y, et al. Mechanisms of morphological evolution of Li2O2 particles during electrochemical growth. J Phys Chem Lett, 2013, 4: 1060–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gallant BM, Mitchell RR, Kwabi DG, et al. Chemical andmorphological changes of Li–O2 battery electrodes upon cycling. J Phys Chem C, 2012, 116: 20800–20805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Huang X, Yu H, Tan H, et al. Carbon nanotube-encapsulated noble metal nanoparticle hybrid as a cathode material for Li-oxygen batteries. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 6516–6523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gallant BM, Kwabi DG, Mitchell RR, et al. Influence of Li2O2 morphology on oxygen reduction and evolution kinetics in Li–O2 batteries. Energ Environ Sci, 2013, 6: 2518–2528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bruce PG, Freunberger SA, Hardwick LJ, et al. Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat Mater, 2011, 11: 19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zheng X, Deng J, Wang N, et al. Podlike N-doped carbon nanotubes encapsulating feni alloy nanoparticles: high-performance counter electrode materials for dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53: 7023–7027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang Y, Lun Z, Xia G, et al. Non-precious alloy encapsulated in nitrogen-doped graphene layers derived from MOFs as an active and durable hydrogen evolution reaction catalyst. Energ Environ Sci, 2015, 8: 3563–3571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wen Z, Ci S, Zhang F, et al. Nitrogen-enriched core-shell structured Fe/Fe3C-C nanorods as advanced electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Adv Mater, 2012, 24: 1399–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Deng D, Yu L, Chen X, et al. Iron encapsulated within pod-like carbon nanotubes for oxygen reduction reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013, 52: 371–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54: 11169–11186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kresse G, Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B, 1999, 59: 1758–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 77: 3865–3868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Vinogradov NA, Zakharov AA, Kocevski V, et al. Formation and structure of graphene waves on Fe(110). Phys Rev Lett, 2012, 109: 026101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Grimme S. Supramolecular binding thermodynamics by dispersion- corrected density functional theory. Chem Eur J, 2012, 18: 9955–9964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Henkelman G, Uberuaga BP, Jónsson H. A climbing image nudged elastic bandmethod for finding saddle points andminimumenergy paths. J Chem Phys, 2000, 113: 9901–9904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Oya A, Otani S. Catalytic graphitization of carbons by variousmetals. Carbon, 1979, 17: 131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Whittingham MS.Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chem Rev, 2004, 104: 4271–4302

  60. Freunberger SA, Chen Y, Peng Z, et al. Reactions in the rechargeable lithium–O2 battery with alkyl carbonate electrolytes. J Am Chem Soc, 2011, 133: 8040–8047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yilmaz E, Yogi C, Yamanaka K, et al. Promoting formation of noncrystalline Li2O2 in the Li–O2 battery with RuO2 nanoparticles. Nano Lett, 2013, 13: 4679–4684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhong L, Mitchell RR, Liu Y, et al. In situ transmission electronmicroscopy observations of electrochemical oxidation of Li2O2. Nano Lett, 2013, 13: 2209–2214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lu YC, Gasteiger HA, Parent MC, et al. The influence of catalysts on discharge and charge voltages of rechargeable Li–oxygen batteries. Electrochem Solid-State Lett, 2010, 13: A69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Deng J, Ren P, Deng D, et al. Enhanced electron penetration through an ultrathin graphene layer for highly efficient catalysis of the hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2015, 54: 2100–2104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, 51522203), Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (151047), the Recruitment Program of Global Youth Experts (2014) and Xinghai Scholarship of Dalian University of Technology. Wang Z and Zhou T also acknowledge the support by the Opening Project of State Key Lab of Polymer Materials Engineering, China (Sklpme2015-4-25).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Si Zhou  (周思), Zhiyu Wang  (王治宇) or Jieshan Qiu  (邱介山).

Additional information

Mengzhou Yu received her MSc degree from Dalian University of Technology (DUT) in 2016. Currently, she is a PhD candidate at the School of Chemical Engineering in DUT. Her research mainly focuses on the development of high-performance electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction/evolution reactions.

Si Zhou received her PhD degree from the School of Physics at Georgia Institute of Technology in 2014. She is currently an associate professor at DUT. Her research interests focus on computational design of advanced materials for electronics and energy storage and conversion devices.

Zhiyu Wang received his PhD degree fromthe School of Chemical Engineering at DUT in China. Currently he is a professor of the School of Chemical Engineering in DUT. His research focuses on the design and synthesis of functional hybrid nanomaterials for energy storage/conversion applications. Jieshan

Jieshan Qiu received his PhD degree from the School of Chemical Engineering at DUT in China. He was appointed to a Cheung-Kong Distinguished Professor in 2009. He is a professor of the School of Chemical Engineering and director of the Carbon Research Laboratory at DUT. His research focuses on the development of new methodologies for the synthesis of functional carbon materials, as well as their applications in catalysis, energy conversion/storage and environment protection.

Electronic supplementary material

40843_2017_9021_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Long life rechargeable Li-O2 batteries enabled by enhanced charge transfer in nanocable-like Fe@N-doped carbon nanotube catalyst

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, M., Zhou, S., Liu, Y. et al. Long life rechargeable Li-O2 batteries enabled by enhanced charge transfer in nanocable-like Fe@N-doped carbon nanotube catalyst. Sci. China Mater. 60, 415–426 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-017-9021-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-017-9021-6

Keywords

Navigation