Skip to main content
Log in

π-Linkage effect of push-pull-structure organic small molecules for photovoltaic application

推拉结构有机小分子光伏材料中的π-桥键效应

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Science China Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much attention has been paid to the push-pullstructure organic small molecule (OSM) materials for photovoltaic (PV) application in the past decade, due to their facile reduction of energy band gap (E g ) and effective control of PV properties. π-bridge plays an important role in the push-pull-structure OSMs since an appropriate π-linkage is crucial for improving the PV performance of organic solar cells (OSCs). In this review, various π-bridge groups (thiophene, alkene, alkyne, arene and heterocycle) and the pertinent π-linkage effect will be systematically summarized. These results suggest that the in-depth study of the π-linkage effect is essential to deeply understanding the relationship between the molecular structure and property, thus improving PV performance.

摘要

在过去的十年中, 推拉结构的有机小分子光伏材料由于分子带隙及光伏性能等易于实现有效的调控, 在光伏领域中受到了广泛的关注, 适宜的桥键联接对于提升有机太阳能电池的光伏性能起到了重要的作用, 因此π-桥键在推拉结构的有机小分子设计中扮演着十分重要的角色. 本文重点综述了推拉机构有机小分子的不同π-桥键(包括噻吩, 烯烃, 炔烃, 芳烃和杂环及其相应的衍生物) 对于材料的光伏性能所产生的重要影响, 这些结果表明,深入的研究π-桥键效应对于深刻理解分子结构和材料性能之间的关系以及通过分子的结构优化来提高材料的光伏性能具有十分重要的意义.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chu S, Majumdar A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature, 2012, 488: 294–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chow J. Energy resources and global development. Science, 2003, 302: 1528–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Turner JA. A realizable renewable energy future. Science, 1999, 285: 687–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coughlin JE, Henson ZB, Welch GC, et al. Design and synthesis of molecular donors for solution-processed high-efficiency organic solar cells. Acc Chem Res, 2014, 47: 257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Worch JC, Chirdon DN, Maurer AB, et al. Synthetic tuning of electronic and photophysical properties of 2-aryl-1, 3-benzothiaphospholes. J Org Chem, 2013, 78: 7462–7469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Demeter D, Rousseau T, Leriche P, et al. Manipulation of the open-circuit voltage of organic solar cells by desymmetrization of the structure of acceptor-donor-acceptor molecules. Adv Funct Mater, 2011, 21: 4379–4387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peet J, Heeger AJ, Bazan GC. “Plastic” solar cells: self-assembly of bulk heterojunction nanomaterials by spontaneous phase separation. Acc Chem Res, 2009, 42: 1700–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Walker B, Kim C, Nguyen TQ. Small molecule solution-processed bulk heterojunction solar cells. Chem Mater, 2011, 23: 470–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rand BP, Genoe J, Heremans P, et al. Solar cells utilizing small molecular weight organic semiconductors. Prog Photovolt-Res Appl, 2007, 15: 659–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazzio KA, Luscombe CK. The future of organic photovoltaics. Chem Soc Rev, 2015, 44: 78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu X, Kyaw AKK, Peng B, et al. A plasmonically enhanced polymer solar cell with gold–silica core–shell nanorods. Org Electron, 2013, 14: 2360–2368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kyaw AKK, Wang DH, Gupta V, et al. Intensity dependence of current–voltage characteristics and recombination in high-efficiency solution-processed small-molecule solar cells. ACS Nano, 2013, 7: 4569–4577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu X, Kyaw AKK, Peng B, et al. Enhanced efficiency of solution-processed small-molecule solar cells upon incorporation of gold nanospheres and nanorods into organic layers. Chem Commun, 2014, 50: 4451–4454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang DH, Kyaw AKK, Pouliot JR, et al. Enhanced power conversion efficiency of low band-gap polymer solar cells by insertion of optimized binary processing additives. Adv Energy Mater, 2014, 4: 1300835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Z, Pei J, Li Y, et al. Synthesis and photovoltaic properties of solution processable small molecules containing 2-pyran-4-ylidenemalononitrile and oligothiophene moieties. J Phys Chem C, 2010, 114: 18270–18278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Z, Dong Q, Xu B, et al. Novel solution processable smallmolecule containing new electron-withdrawing group and oligothiophene for photovoltaic applications. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells, 2012, 98: 343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Z, Bian J, Wang Y, et al. Effect of alkyl chain length on the photovoltaic performance of oligothiophene-based smallmolecules. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells, 2014, 130: 336–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kan B, Li M, Zhang Q, et al. A series of simple oligomer-like small molecules based on oligothiophenes for solution-processed solar cells with high efficiency. J AmChem Soc, 2015, 137: 3886–3893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heremans P, Cheyns D, Rand BP. Strategies for increasing the efficiency of heterojunction organic solar cells: material selection and device architecture. Acc Chem Res, 2009, 42: 1740–1747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang QL, Li HX. Recent progress of bulk heterojunction solar cells based on small-molecular donors. Chin Sci Bull, 2013, 58: 2677–2685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen Y, Wan X, Long G. High performance photovoltaic applications using solution-processed small molecules. Acc Chem Res, 2013, 46: 2645–2655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dutta P, Yang W, Lee WH, et al. Novel naphtho[1, 2-b:5, 6-b']dithiophene core linear donor–π–acceptor conjugated small molecules with thiophene-bridged bithiazole acceptor: design, synthesis, and their application in bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. J Mater Chem, 2012, 22: 10840–10851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Velusamy M, Huang JH, Hsu YC, et al. Dibenzo [f, h]thieno[3, 4-b] quinoxaline-based small molecules for efficient bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Org Lett, 2009, 11: 4898–4901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhen H, Liu J, Hou L, et al. Synthesis and photovoltaic properties of star-shaped triphenylamine molecules with donor–acceptor unit as core. J Mater Sci-Mater Electron, 2014, 25: 3559–3565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Y, Wan X, Wang F, et al. Spin-coated small molecules for high performance solar cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2011, 1: 771–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Y, Wan X, Wang F, et al. High-performance solar cells using a solution-processed small molecule containing benzodithiophene unit. Adv Mater, 2011, 23: 5387–5391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shang H, Fan H, Shi Q, et al. Solution processable D-A-Dmolecules based on triphenylamine for efficient organic solar cells. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells, 2010, 94: 457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang J, Wu G, He C, et al. Triphenylamine-containing D–A–D molecules with (dicyanomethylene)pyran as an acceptor unit for bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells. J Mater Chem, 2011, 21: 3768–3774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shi Q, Cheng P, Li Y, et al. A solution processable D-A-D molecule based on thiazolothiazole for high performance organic solar cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2012, 2: 63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shen S, Jiang P, He C, et al. Solution-processable organic molecule photovoltaic materials with bithienyl-benzodithiophene central unit and indenedione end groups. Chem Mater, 2013, 25: 2274–2281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yin N, Wang L, Ma Y, et al. 4, 8-Bis(thienyl)-benzo[1, 2-b:4, 5-b']dithiophene based A-π-D-π-A typed conjugated small molecules with mono-thiophene as the p-bridge: Synthesis, properties and photovoltaic performance. Dyes Pigments, 2015, 120: 299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang JL, Yin QR, Miao JS, et al. Rational design of small molecular donor for solution-processed organic photovoltaics with 8. 1% efficiency and high fill factor via multiple fluorine substituents and thiophene bridge. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 3514–3523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mikroyannidis JA, Kabanakis AN, Kumar A, et al. Synthesis of a low-band-gap small molecule based on acenaphthoquinoxaline for efficient bulk heterojunction solar cells. Langmuir, 2010, 26: 12909–12916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim J, Cho N, Minko H, et al. Push-pull organic semiconductors comprising of bis-dimethylfluorenyl amino benzo[b]thiophene donor and various acceptors for solution processed small molecule organic solar cells. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells, 2012, 102: 159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bai H, Wang Y, Cheng P, et al. Acceptor–donor–acceptor small molecules based on indacenodithiophene for efficient organic solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 8426–8433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tamayo AB, Walker B, Nguyen TQ. A low band gap, solution processable oligothiophene with a diketopyrrolopyrrole core for use in organic solar cells. J Phys ChemC, 2008, 112: 11545–11551

    Google Scholar 

  37. Xia PF, Feng XJ, Lu J, et al. Donor-acceptor oligothiophenes as low optical gap chromophores for photovoltaic applications. Adv Mater, 2008, 20: 4810–4815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fitzner R, Reinold E, Mishra A, et al. Dicyanovinyl-substituted oligothiophenes: structure-property relationships and application in vacuum-processed small molecule organic solar cells. Adv Funct Mater, 2011, 21: 897–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xia PF, Feng XJ, Lu J, et al. Triarylamino and tricyanovinyl endcapped oligothiophenes with reduced optical gap for photovoltaic applications. J Phys ChemC, 2008, 112: 16714–16720

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang W, Tse SC, Lu J, et al. Solution processable donor–acceptor oligothiophenes for bulk-heterojunction solar cells. J Mater Chem, 2010, 20: 2182–2189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang J, Deng D, He C, et al. Solution-processable star-shaped molecules with triphenylamine core and dicyanovinyl endgroups for organic solar cells. Chem Mater, 2011, 23: 817–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin Y, Zhang ZG, Bai H, et al. A star-shaped oligothiophene endcapped with alkyl cyanoacetate groups for solution-processed organic solar cells. Chem Commun, 2012, 48: 9655–9657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cho N, Song K, Lee JK, et al. Facile synthesis of fluorine-substituted benzothiadiazole-based organic semiconductors and their use in solution-processed small-molecule organic solar cells. Chem Eur J, 2012, 18: 11433–11439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tang W, Huang D, He C, et al. Solution-processed small molecules based on indacenodithiophene for high performance thin-film transistors and organic solar cells. Org Electron, 2014, 15: 1155–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lin Y, Cheng P, Liu Y, et al. Small molecules based on bithiazole for solution-processed organic solar cells. Org Electron, 2012, 13: 673–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cheng P, Shi Q, Lin Y, et al. Evolved structure of thiazolothiazole based small molecules towards enhanced efficiency in organic solar cells. Org Electron, 2013, 14: 599–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou J, Wan X, Liu Y, et al. A planar small molecule with dithienosilole core for high efficiency solution-processed organic photovoltaic cells. Chem Mater, 2011, 23: 4666–4668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou J, Wan X, Liu Y, et al. Small molecules based on benzo[1, 2-b:4, 5-b']dithiophene unit for high-performance solution-processed organic solar cells. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134: 16345–16351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ni W, Li M, Wan X, et al. A high-performance photovoltaic small molecule developed by modifying the chemical structure and optimizing the morphology of the active layer. RSC Adv, 2014, 4: 31977–31980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kan B, Zhang Q, Liu F, et al. Small molecules based on alkyl/alkylthio-thieno [3, 2-b] thiophene-substituted benzo[1, 2-b:4, 5-b]dithiophene for solution-processed solar cells with high performance. Chem Mater, 2015, 27: 8414–8423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kan B, Zhang Q, Li M, et al. Solution-processed organic solar cells based on dialkylthiol-substituted benzodithiophene unit with efficiency near 10%. J AmChem Soc, 2014, 136: 15529–15532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Cui C, Guo X, Min J, et al. High-performance organic solar cells based on a small molecule with alkylthio-thienyl-conjugated side chains without extra treatments. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 7469–7475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Deng D, Yang Y, Zhang J, et al. Triphenylamine-containing linear D-A-D molecules with benzothiadiazole as acceptor unit for bulkheterojunction organic solar cells. Org Electron, 2011, 12: 614–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Deng D, Shen S, Zhang J, et al. Solution-processable star-shaped photovoltaic organic molecule with triphenylamine core and thieno[3, 2-b]thiophene–dicyanovinyl arms. Organic Electrons, 2012, 13: 2546–2552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lee JK, Lee S, Yun SJ. Effects of fused thiophene bridges in organic semiconductors for solution-processed small-molecule organic solar cells. Bull Korean Chem Soc, 2013, 34: 2148–2154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Lee JK, Kim J, Choi H, et al. Push–pull organic semiconductors with planar indenothiophene bridges for solution-processed small-molecule organic solar cells. Tetrahedron, 2014, 70: 6235–6240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wang JL, Xiao F, Yan J, et al. Toward high performance indacenodithiophene-based small-molecule organic solar cells: investigation of the effect of fused aromatic bridges on the device performance. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4: 2252–2262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. He C, He Q, Yang X, et al. Synthesis and photovoltaic properties of a solution-processable organic molecule containing triphenylamine and DCM moieties. J Phys ChemC, 2007, 111: 8661–8666

    Google Scholar 

  59. Zhou Y, Peng P, Han L, et al. Novel donor–acceptor molecules as donors for bulk heterojunction solar cells. Synt Metals, 2007, 157: 502–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yang Y, Zhang J, Zhou Y, et al. Solution-processable organic molecule with triphenylamine core and two benzothiadiazole-thiophene arms for photovoltaic application. J Phys Chem C, 2010, 114: 3701–3706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mikroyannidis JA, Kabanakis AN, Sharma SS, et al. Low band-gap phenylenevinylene and fluorenevinylene small molecules containing triphenylamine segments: synthesis and application in bulk heterojunction solar cells. Org Electron, 2011, 12: 774–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kylberg W, Sonar P, Heier J, et al. Synthesis, thin-film morphology, and comparative study of bulk and bilayer heterojunction organic photovoltaic devices using soluble diketopyrrolopyrrole molecules. Energy Environ Sci, 2011, 4: 3617–3624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Cho MJ, Seo J, Oh HS, et al. Tricyanofuran-based donor–acceptor type chromophores for bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells, 2012, 98: 71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zitzler-kunkel A, Lenze MR, Schnier T, et al. Comparative studies on optical, redox, and photovoltaic properties of a series of D-A-D and analogous D-A chromophores. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 4645–4653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sharma GD, Patel KR, Roy MS, et al. Characterization of two new (A–π)2–D–A type dyes with different central D unit and their application for dye sensitized solar cells. Org Electron, 2014, 15: 1780–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhao G, Wu G, He C, et al. Solution-processablemultiarmed organic molecules containing triphenylamine and DCM moieties: synthesis and photovoltaic properties. J Phys ChemC, 2009, 113: 2636–2642

    Google Scholar 

  67. He C, He Q, Yi Y, et al. Improving the efficiency of solution processable organic photovoltaic devices by a star-shaped molecular geometry. J Mater Chem, 2008, 18: 4085–4090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zeng S, Yin L, Jiang X, et al. D-A-D low band gap molecule containing triphenylamine and benzoxadiazole/benzothiadiazole units: synthesis and photophysical properties. Dyes Pigments, 2012, 95: 229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhang J, Yang Y, He C, et al. Solution-processable star-shaped photovoltaic organicmolecule with triphenylamine core and benzothiadiazole-thiophene arms. Macromolecules, 2009, 42: 7619–7622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Tang S, Zhang J. Rational design of organic asymmetric donors D1–A–D2 possessing broad absorption regions and suitable frontier molecular orbitals to match typical acceptors toward solar cells. J Phys Chem A, 2011, 115: 5184–5191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zeng S, Yin L, Ji C, et al. D–π–A–π–D type benzothiadiazole–triphenylamine based small molecules containing cyano on the p-bridge for solution-processed organic solar cells with high open-circuit voltage. Chem Commun, 2012, 48: 10627–10629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wang L, Yin L, Ji C, et al. High open-circuit voltage of the solution-processed organic solar cells based on benzothiadiazole–triphenylamine small molecules incorporating p-linkage. Organic Electrons, 2014, 15: 1138–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Ji C, Yin L, Wang L, et al. Linkage effects of linear D–π–A–π–D type diketopyrrolopyrrole-triphenylamine based solution-processable organic small molecule photovoltaic materials. J Mater Chem C, 2014, 2: 4019–4026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Valentini L, Bagnis D, Marrocchi A, et al. Novel anthracene-core molecule for the development of efficient pcbm-based solar cells. Chem Mater, 2008, 20: 32–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang H, Lim HS, Kim S, et al. Oliogothiophenes end-capped with arylacetylenes for organic thin film transistors. Synt Metals, 2009, 159: 2564–2570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Marrocchi A, Spalletti A, Ciorba S, et al. Synthesis and photophysical properties of conjugated anthracene-based compounds. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem, 2010, 211: 162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Seri M, Marrocchi A, Bagnis D, et al. Molecular-shape-controlled photovoltaic performance probed via soluble π-conjugated arylacetylenic semiconductors. Adv Mater, 2011, 23: 3827–3831

    Google Scholar 

  78. Valentini L, Marrocchi A, Seri M, et al. [2]. 2Paracyclophane-based molecular systems for the development of organic solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 2008, 516: 7193–7198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Silvestri F, Marrocchi A, Seri M, et al. Solution-processable low-molecular weight extended arylacetylenes: versatile π-type semiconductors for field-effect transistors and bulk heterojunction solar cells. J AmChem Soc, 2010, 132: 6108–6123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Flamini R, Tomasi I, Marrocchi A, et al. Synthesis and photobehaviour of donor-π-acceptor conjugated arylacetylenes. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem, 2011, 223: 140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Zhao X, Ma L, Zhang L, et al. An acetylene-containing perylene diimide copolymer for high mobility n-channel transistor in air. Macromolecules, 2013, 46: 2152–2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Braunecker WA, Oosterhout SD, Owczarczyk ZR, et al. Ethynylene-linked donor–acceptor alternating copolymers. Macromolecules, 2013, 46: 3367–3375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Flamini R, Marrocchi A, Spalletti A. Quantitative cascade energy transfer in semiconductor thin films. Photochem Photobiol Sci, 2014, 13: 1031–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Marrocchi A, Silvestri F, Seri M, et al. Conjugated anthracene derivatives as donor materials for bulk heterojunction solar cells: olefinic versus acetylenic spacers. Chem Commun, 2009, 1380–1382

    Google Scholar 

  85. Wu Z, Li A, Fan B, et al. Phenanthrene-functionalized 3, 6-dithiophen-2-yl-2, 5-dihydropyrrolo[3, 4–c]pyrrole-1, 4-diones as donor molecules for solution-processed organic photovoltaic cells. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells, 2011, 95: 2516–2523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Grisorio R, Allegretta G, Suranna GP, et al. Monodispersed vs. polydispersed systems for bulk heterojunction solar cells: the case of dithienopyrrole/anthracene based materials. J Mater Chem, 2012, 22: 19752–19760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Mun JW, Cho I, Lee D, et al. Acetylene-bridged D–A–D type small molecule comprising pyrene and diketopyrrolopyrrole for high efficiency organic solar cells. Org Electron, 2013, 14: 2341–2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Gao H, Li Y, Wang L, et al. High performance asymmetrical push–pull small molecules end-capped with cyanophenyl for solution-processed solar cells. Chem Commun, 2014, 50: 10251–10254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Gao K, Li L, Lai T, et al. Deep absorbing porphyrin small molecule for high-performance organic solar cells with very low energy losses. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137: 7282–7285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Li Z, Dong Q, Li Y, et al. Design and synthesis of solution processable small molecules towards high photovoltaic performance. J Mater Chem, 2011, 21: 2159–2168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Mikroyannidis JA, Stylianakis MM, Balraju P, et al. Novel π-phenylenevinylene compounds containing thiophene or anthracene moieties and cyano-vinylene bonds for photovoltaic applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2009, 1: 1711–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. So S, Choi H, Minko H, et al. Novel unsymmetrical push–pull squaraine chromophores for solution processed smallmolecule bulk heterojunction solar cells. Solar EnergyMater Solar Cells, 2012, 98: 224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Sharma GD, Mikroyannidis JA, Kurchania R, et al. Organic bulk heterojunction solar cells based on solution processable small molecules (A–π–A) featuring 2-(4-nitrophenyl) acrylonitrile acceptors and phthalimide-based p-linkers. J Mater Chem, 2012, 22: 13986–13995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Lin LY, Chen YH, Huang ZY, et al. A low-energy-gap organic dye for high-performance small-molecule organic solar cells. J Am Chem Soc, 2011, 133: 15822–15825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Chen YH, Lin LY, Lu CW, et al. Vacuum-deposited small-molecule organic solar cells with high power conversion efficiencies by judicious molecular design and device optimization. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134: 13616–13623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Chiu SW, Lin LY, Lin HW, et al. A donor–acceptor–acceptor molecule for vacuum-processed organic solar cells with a power conversion efficiency of 6.4%. Chem Commun, 2012, 48: 1857–1859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Wang D, Zhang X, Ding W, et al. Density functional theory design and characterization of D–A–A type electron donors with narrow band gap for small-molecule organic solar cells. Comp Theor Chem, 2014, 1029: 68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Liu Y, Yang YM, Chen CC, et al. Solution-processed smallmolecules using different electron linkers for high-performance solar cells. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 4657–4662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Chi LC, Chen HF, Hung WY, et al. Donor-acceptor small molecule with coplanar and rigid p-bridge for efficient organic solar cells. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells, 2013, 109: 33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Paek S, Lee JK, Ko J. Synthesis and photovoltaic characteristics of push–pull organic semiconductors containing an electron-rich dithienosilole bridge for solution-processed small-molecule organic solar cells. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells, 2014, 120: 209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Lin HW, Lin LY, Chen YH, et al. A new donor–acceptor molecule with uniaxial anisotropy for efficient vacuum-deposited organic solar cells. Chem Commun, 2011, 47: 7872–7874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Sharma GD, Zervaki GE, Angaridis PA, et al. Triazine-bridged porphyrin triad as electron donor for solution-processed bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. J Phys ChemC, 2014, 118: 5968–5977

    Google Scholar 

  103. Nazim M, Ameen S, Akhtar MS, et al. Furan-bridged thiazolo [5, 4-d]thiazole based D–π–A–π–D type linear chromophore for solution-processed bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells. RSC Adv, 2015, 5: 6286–6293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Liu W, Yao J, Zhan C. Performance enhancement of BODIPY dimerbased small-molecule solar cells using a visible-photon-capturing diketopyrrolopyrrole p-bridge. RSC Adv, 2015, 5: 74238–74241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Sharma GD, Zervaki GE, Angaridis PA, et al. Stepwise co-sensitization as a useful tool for enhancement of power conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells: the case of an unsymmetrical porphyrin dyad and a metal-free organic dye. Org Electron, 2014, 15: 1324–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Zervaki GE, Roy MS, Panda MK, et al. Efficient sensitization of dye-sensitized solar cells by novel triazine-bridged porphyrin–porphyrin dyads. Inorg Chem, 2013, 52: 9813–9825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Liu J, Wang K, Xu F, et al. Synthesis and photovoltaic performances of donor–π–acceptor dyes utilizing 1, 3, 5-triazine as p spacers. Tetrahedron Lett, 2011, 52: 6492–6496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Shu W, Valiyaveettil S. Intramolecular hydrogen bond assisted planarization and self-assembly of simple disc-shaped molecules in mesophases. Chem Commun, 2002, 1350–1351

    Google Scholar 

  109. Zou L, Liu Z, Yan X, et al. Star-shaped D-π-A molecules containing a 2, 4, 6-tri(thiophen-2-yl)-1, 3, 5-triazine unit: synthesis and two-photon absorption properties. Eur J Org Chem, 2009, 2009: 5587–5593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Leriche P, Piron F, Ripaud E, et al. Star-shaped triazine-thiophene conjugated systems. Tetrahedron Lett, 2009, 50: 5673–5676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Omer KM, Ku SY, Chen YC, et al. Electrochemical behavior and electrogenerated chemiluminescence of star-shaped D-A compounds with a 1, 3, 5-triazine core and substituted fluorene arms. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132: 10944–10952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Zhong H, Lai H, Fang Q. New conjugated triazine based molecular materials for application in optoelectronic devices: design, synthesis, and properties. J Phys ChemC, 2011, 115: 2423–2427

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanqin Li  (李艳芹).

Additional information

Rui Wu was born in Gansu, China. She earned his BSc degree (2013) in chemistry from Ludong University. She received herMSc degree (2016) in inorganic chemistry fromDalianUniversity of Technology. She joined Prof. Yanqin Li’s group as a postgraduate in 2013 and her research focuses on the design and synthesis of organic small molecule photovoltaic materials.

Lunxiang Yin received his PhD degree in 2005 from Humboldt University (Berlin, Germany). He was then a postdoctoral researcher from2005 to 2007 in the University of California (Davis, USA). He worked as a senior researcher in the National Nanotechnology Laboratory (Lecce, Italy) from 2007 to 2008. He has been an associate professor in Dalian University of Technology (Dalian, China) since 2008. His research focuses on organic synthesis and optoelectronic materials.

Yanqin Li received her Bachelor and PhD degrees from Jilin University in 1995 and 2000, respectively. From 2000 to 2002, she worked in Hongkong University as a research fellow. From 2002 to 2004, she was a postdoctoral fellow at Humboldt University in Berlin of Germany. From 2004 to 2008, she was a senior researcher in the National Nanotechnology Lab of Italy. She was a visiting scholar at the University of California in Berkeley (UC-Berkeley, USA) from 2006 to 2007. She has been a professor at the Department of Chemistry, Dalian University of Technology since 2008. Her current research interest mainly focuses on organic optoelectronic materials and devices.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, R., Yin, L. & Li, Y. π-Linkage effect of push-pull-structure organic small molecules for photovoltaic application. Sci. China Mater. 59, 371–388 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-016-5050-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-016-5050-7

Keywords

Navigation