Flexible Learning Spaces: Inclusive by Design?

  • Leon BenadeEmail author


The idea that the New Zealand education system will cater to all students, regardless of ability, and support them in developing their full potential to the best of their abilities, is enshrined in the famous 1939 Beeby/Fraser statement. Equality of access policy discourse has shifted to emphasise equitable outcomes, focussed increasingly on preparing students for success in the globalised, 21st century knowledge economy. In this context, the design and development of innovative new school buildings and refurbishments of existing facilities have been promoted as a policy that will enable, even bring about, modern pedagogical practices that, in turn, will achieve the stated aim of preparing students for the 21st century global economy. Arguments against retaining traditional single-cell classrooms include their perpetuation of traditional, mainstream (‘one-size-fits-all’) approaches to teaching and learning, while new, radical building designs hold the promise of enabling the desired ‘new’ pedagogies. Flexible learning environments encourage and enable teachers to exchange ‘front-of-the-room’, single teacher presentational approaches for collaborative, dispersed and facilitative styles, often in teams, working with multiple students in shared, common learning spaces. The New Zealand Curriculum has ensured inclusion as an educational principle, and current Ministry of Education policy discourse reminds schools of their commitment to this principle, and specifically links building design and design processes to ensuring inclusivity. So it should be asked whether non-traditional, flexible learning spaces can be inclusive. This article places this question in the context of the historically evolving approach to inclusion in the New Zealand context, and with reference to the ‘spatial turn’ in recent New Zealand education policy. This turn to enhanced flexibility and innovation has implications for inclusivity, reflected in both Ministry of Education policy discourse and critiques suggesting the exclusionary effects of flexibility. It is argued with reference to Lefebvre that notions of inclusion and exclusion are inherent in social practices that are both superimposed upon material space as much as they are influenced by the design features of that space.


Innovative Learning Environments Flexible Learning Space ILE Inclusion Equity School design 



  1. Barback, J. (Feb 14, 2018). Inclusive education—where are we going wrong? Education Review. Retrieved 2 September 2018 from
  2. Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.). (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Benade, L. (2016). Is the classroom obsolete in the twenty-first century? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 796–807. Scholar
  4. Benade, L. (2017). Being a teacher in the 21st century: A critical New Zealand study. Singapore: Springer Nature. Scholar
  5. Benade, L. (2019, in press). Effective teaching in flexible learning spaces. In M. Hill & M. Thrupp (Eds.), The professional practice of teaching (6th ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  6. Bevan-Brown, J. (2015). Introduction. In J. Bevan-Brown, M. Berryman, H. Hickey, S. Macfarlane, K. Smiler, & T. Walker (Eds.), Working with Māori children with special educational needs (pp. 3–29). Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J. & Aranda, G. (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes Literature review, paper No. 22 June. State of Victoria (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development). Retrieved from
  8. Bolstad, R., & Gilbert, J., with McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning and teaching: A New Zealand perspective. Report prepared for the Ministry of Education. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research and Ministry of Education.
  9. Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (1996). Education, globalisation and economic development. Journal of Education Policy, 11(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butterworth, G., & Butterworth, S. (1998). Reforming education: The New Zealand experience 1984–1996. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter, V., & Jaramillo, N. (2014). Social justice in education. In A. St. George, S. Brown, & J. O’Neill (Eds.), Facing the big questions in teaching: Purpose, power and learning (2nd ed., pp. 65–72). Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  12. Caughley, J. (1928). The development of the curriculum. In I. Davey (Ed.), Fifty years of national education in New Zealand: 1878–1928 (pp. 36–45). Auckland, New Zealand: Whitcombe & Tombs Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Chapman, A., Randell-Moon, H., Campbell, M., & Drew, C. (2014). Students in space: Student practices in non-traditional classrooms. Global Studies of Childhood, 4(1), 39–48. Scholar
  14. Charteris, J., Smardon, D., & Nelson, E. (2017). Innovative learning environments and new materialism: A conjunctural analysis of pedagogic spaces. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 808–821. Scholar
  15. Charteris, J., Smardon, D., & Page, A. (2018). Spatialised practices in ILEs: Pedagogical transformations and learner agency. In L. Benade & M. Jackson (Eds.), Transforming education: Design & governance in global contexts (pp. 19–32). Singapore: Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Codd, J. (2005a). Is there a ‘Third Way’ for education policy? In J. Codd & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Education policy directions in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. xiii–xviii). Southbank, VIC, Australia: Thomson Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  17. Codd, J. (2005b). Politics and policy making in education. In P. Adams, K. Vossler, & C. Scrivens (Eds.), Teachers’ work in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 28–38). Southbank, Vic, Australia: Thomson Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  18. Codd, J. (2005c). Teachers as ‘managed professionals’ in the global education industry: The New Zealand experience. Educational Review, 57(2), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dumont, H., & Istance, D. (2010). Politics and policy making in education. In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 19–34). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing. Scholar
  20. Eder, J. (2018, May 2). ‘My child is not a guinea pig’: Parents want proof ‘experimental’ classrooms work. The Marlborough Express. Retrieved 2 Feb 2019 from
  21. Equality Challenge Unit. (2013). Equality and diversity for academics: Inclusive practice.
  22. Fisher, K. (2005). Research into identifying effective learning environments. Retrieved from
  23. Imms, W. (2016). New generation learning environments: How can we find out if what works is working? In W. Imms, B. Cleveland, & K. Fisher (Eds.), Evaluating learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge (pp. 21–34). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones, K. (2018, Jul 21). Are modern learning environments working in our schools? Nelson Mail. Retrieved 2 Feb 2018 from
  25. Kearney, A., & Bevan-Brown, J. (2014). Inclusive education: Addressing the challenge of equity in education. In A. St. George, S. Brown, & J. O’Neill (Eds.), Facing the big questions in teaching: Purpose, power and learning (pp. 97–103). Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  26. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. (D. Nicholson-Smith, trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Loveless, A., & Williamson, B. (2013). Learning identities in a digital age: Rethinking creativity, education and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKenzie, D. (1997). The cult of efficiency and miseducation: Issues of assessment in New Zealand schools. In M. Olssen & K. Morris Matthews (Eds.), Education policy in New Zealand: the 1990s and beyond (pp. 47–64). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  29. McLaren, J. & Page, W.H. (2012). Noise issues in inclusive learning environments. In Centre of excellence for research in inclusive education, (pp. 204–219). Auckland, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mealings, K., Buchholz, J., Demuth, K., & Dillon, H. (2015). Investigating the acoustics of a sample of open plan and enclosed Kindergarten classrooms in Australia. Applied Acoustics, 100(2015), 95–105. Scholar
  31. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media Limited. Available from
  32. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015). Flexible learning spaces in schools. Retrieved 2 September 2018 from exible-learning-spaces/.
  33. Ministry of Education. [MOE]. (2018). Inclusive education. Retrieved 2 September 2018 from
  34. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (nd). Talking terminology.Retrieved 2 September 2018 from
  35. Nair, P. (2011). The classroom is obsolete: It’s time for something new. Education Week. Retrieved 2 September 2018, from
  36. New Zealand Taskforce to Review Education Administration. (1988). Administering for excellence: effective administration in education. Wellington, New Zealand: The Taskforce.Google Scholar
  37. Olssen, M., & Morris Matthews, K. (1997). Introduction. In M. Olssen & K. Morris Matthews (Eds.), Education policy in New Zealand: the 1990s and beyond (pp. 7–46). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  38. O’Neill, A., Clark, J., & Openshaw, R. (2004). Mapping the field: An introduction to curriculum politics in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In A. O’Neill, J. Clark, & R. Openshaw (Eds.), Reshaping culture, knowledge and learning? Policy and content in the New Zealand Curriculum Framework (Vol. 1, pp. 25–46). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  39. Openshaw, R. (2009). Reforming New Zealand secondary education: The Picot Report and the road to radical reform New York. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Retrieved from
  41. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2013). Innovative Learning Environments. Retrieved 2 September 2018 from
  42. Page, A., & Davis, A. (2016). The alignment of Innovative Learning Environments and inclusive education: How effective is the new learning environment in meeting the needs of special education learners? New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 13(2), 81–98. Scholar
  43. Saavedra, A., & Opfer, D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires, 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Selvaraj, J. (2016). Inclusion in New Zealand secondary schools: Policy and practice. Doctoral thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from
  45. Simon, J. (2000). Education policy change: historical perspectives. In J. Marshall, E. Coxon, K. Jenkins, & A. Jones (Eds.), Politics, policy, pedagogy: education in Aotearoa/New Zealand (pp. 25–70). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sullivan, K. (2002). Editorial: Education policy and practice in contemporary Aotearoa-New Zealand. McGill Journal of Education, 37(1), 6–12.Google Scholar
  47. Tanner, C. K. (2009). Effects of school design on student outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 47, 376–394. Scholar
  48. Te Kete Ipurangi [TKI]. (nd) (a). Developing an inclusive classroom culture. Retrieved 2 September 2018 from
  49. Te Kete Ipurangi [TKI]. (nd) (b). Planning innovative learning environments. Retrieved 2 September 2018 from
  50. Wall, G. (2016). The impact of physical design on student outcomes. Report commissioned by the Ministry of Education.

Copyright information

© New Zealand Association for Research in Education 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Auckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations